![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 186
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I was wondering - when a ship is sunk, it's supposed to stay sunk, right?
I am currently running a career in Jan. '43, based at Brisbane. Back in October of '42, just before the Battle Of Santa Cruz, I intercepted a BIG TF and sank a Taiho Class CV. I was driving USS Sailfish at the time. Now, in Jan. I am in USS Haddock and stalking another honkin' big party of Gentlemen from the competing firm and there are TWO big green carriers, as well as two Shokaku Class CV's. Does the game occasionally forget that you sank a ship when you get a new sub? Or are the Japanese employing film special effects crews that cunningly simulate a sinking, exploding CV with harmless pyrotechnics?
__________________
If it's a fair fight, then you didn't plan it properly. ==================================== |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,288
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
As far as I know the game doesn't take individual ships off the IJN roster when you sink them. You can sink all the ships in a Japanese class like the Kongos or the Shokakus. Doesn't matter. There will be more clones of the same waiting in the wings to be regenerated even on the same patrol.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
No, it doesn't. So it's not really dynamic at all (campaign dynamism implies a host of things SH4 lacks, IMO).
tater |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 186
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Oh, so the roster is set then, for each time period? I guess it's easier to clone them ad lib.
Somewhat lame though, don't you think? It would be annoying to see Hiryu's in '44, for example.
__________________
If it's a fair fight, then you didn't plan it properly. ==================================== |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
Two things.
One, any Hiryu seen after June '42 can be assumed to be the very similar Unryu class. Really, this applies to most ship types except Yamato. There are usually similar ships, and regardless, SH4 is missing IJN ships, so some would always be functioning as "stand-ins" for other ships. Two, the stock campaign is awful, don't play it. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 186
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Ah, ok. I hadn't considered the "stand in" idea. Maybe they're more like "stunt doubles".
I don't play stock, only RSRDC. Does that make any difference?
__________________
If it's a fair fight, then you didn't plan it properly. ==================================== |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|