SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Modern-Era Subsims > Dangerous Waters
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-09, 07:50 PM   #1
SeaQueen
Naval Royalty
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default DW Pro

Hi Guys!

I went to the Surface Warfare Association's expo today to check out all the cool gizmos the Navy wants to buy. They had everything from gas turbine engines to radars, to SM-3 missiles on display. They also had Dangerous Waters (the professional version) on display at the Sonalyst's booth. It was pretty cool. I got to talk to the guys to work with it, and they told me about some of the cool things they've done with it, including interfacing it to other wargames like MAGTF XXI. I also voiced some of my ongoing gripes with the civilian version, but it was still neat.

I also got to turn donuts in the ocean using the Navy's LCS simulator that they had on display. 50kts baby! VROOOOOOOM!!!! It was much more fun than the DDG simulator, where you'd give it some juice and eventually it'd move.
SeaQueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-09, 08:30 PM   #2
LoBlo
Subsim Diehard
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas!
Posts: 971
Downloads: 78
Uploads: 3
Default

<------ *is jealous*
__________________
"Seek not to offend or annoy... only to speak the truth"-a wise man
LoBlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-09, 08:17 PM   #3
SeaQueen
Naval Royalty
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBlo
<------ *is jealous*
In fairness it wasn't THAT cool. The place was very old-fart-in-a-suit heavy. I'm all about a nice suit and some cute pumps, but I thought it was a little bit uptight. Maybe that was just my impression. Actually, the first thing I noticed about the Sonalysts people wasn't that it was the Sonalyst's booth, but rather that they were office casual.

I totally geeked out with the General Electric guy when I asked about why the thermal efficiency of their turbines increased with their horsepower...
SeaQueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-09, 12:06 AM   #4
jmr
Commander
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 462
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
Default

Any info from the Sonalyst people about whether or not they're going to do anything further in the civilian market? DW2 or something along those lines?
jmr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-09, 04:45 AM   #5
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

So what else did they say about DW Pro and about your gripes with DW lite?
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-09, 09:43 AM   #6
SeaQueen
Naval Royalty
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XabbaRus
So what else did they say about DW Pro
DW Pro was neat. They used HLR to link it to all kinds of simulations, those designed specifically for the military and civilian ones. They said you could connect it to everything from Fleet Command to MS Flight Simulator. The other thing I liked about it was that they had a database editor for the Pro version. In my mind, that's the one thing I really wish DW had, because the existing database is really pretty limited. I mean... you can't even put out a full US Expeditionary Strike Group. There's only one type of Arleigh Burke... etc. If they put it out with the database editor, so that the community could add what they didn't have in there, it'd make the game have a longer run time, I think. He said they'd put out a ballistic missile defense version with the AEGIS console in it recently, and I thought that was pretty cool.

Quote:
and about your gripes with DW lite?
Basically I just talked about how I didn't think the sonar model was very accurate and they said something like, "Yeah.. we don't even want to go NEAR anything the Navy MIGHT think is classified." They said theoretically they could make it better, and had done it better for the classified versions, although I'm a little skeptical, knowing the state of the art. I talked to one of their managers, not one of their development team, so of course he's going to tell me they can do everything I ask for, just give us money.
SeaQueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-09, 09:36 AM   #7
SeaQueen
Naval Royalty
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmr
Any info from the Sonalyst people about whether or not they're going to do anything further in the civilian market? DW2 or something along those lines?
Nope. Although, actually my impression was that there was actually a little more freedom to develop in the civilian market than the military market because they understand it a little better. They know about how much money the game will bring in and for how long and plan around that. With the military version of DW (all 18 of them) the attitude is "no contract, no development." That makes sense, because that's how it is in my company too. That's the war business in general.
SeaQueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.