![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
![]()
There's convergence zone modeled in DW as I noted in the mission editor.
So in theory it would be possible to get indirect contact through the convergence zone right? How far down? 1st convergence zone only? 2nd? Third? It's a simple question please don't answer with an unnecessarily overcomplicated answers. In other words...keep it simple. ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]()
It's just an area about 1-1.5nm wide at 30nm intervals where transmission loss is sharply reduced. For sure it goes out to three, I wouldn't rule out a 4th if you can get a loud enough source. Depth doesn't seem to matter at all.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
![]()
Wow so it's possible to get a contact at 90nm. Though the window is pretty short so it's not possible to track a target at convergence zone. Is this correct?. Thanks.
Got a couple questions. Simple doesn't necessarily mean brief. Just do not go into that doctoral paper discussion. ![]() Is indirect detection possible below thermal layer/deep depth in convergence zone? Is direct detection range better when cruising below thermal layer for detecting a below thermal contact(same layer) compared with cruising above thermal and detecting a contact above thermal(same layer)? Btw what is a surface duct. How is it different from convergence zone in terms of detection especially indirect detection. You see I hardly know anything about the sonar environment. So help this poor fellow will you. never too late to learn something. ![]() My questions are both for the game and in RL. Many many thanks before.
__________________
Last edited by Castout; 09-24-08 at 10:43 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
In a CV SSP, there is only a slight difference between direct detection ranges above and below the layer. IIRC, ranges are a bit longer below the layer; but, I made that observation before the studies were done by others showing a correlations between depth and detection range, and there is enough of a margin of error there to cast doubt on my observations. Quote:
A SD SSP has a positive gradient above the layer (the surface duct) and a negative gradient below. You'll get long detection ranges above and short detection ranges below. A CZ SSP has a surface duct above the layer and a sound channel below, in addition to having convergence zones modeled every 30nm. Detection ranges are long both in the duct and in the sound channel. As for real life, DW is fairly close in the surface duct environment; a surface duct really is a zone of positive gradient above the layer where the sound bends away from the layer and refracts along the surface. A real life CZ has very little resemblance to a DW CZ or DW CZ SSP. CZ's don't necessarily form at 30nm intervals and don't occur at all depths simultaneously, but at specific bands in 3-dimensional space (usually--or perhaps always?--near the surface). The SSP also isn't possible without a hell of a lot of excess depth, but a shallow bottom does not prevent the SSP from forming in DW.
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
![]()
Wow thank you for your explanation bear with me as I have to confirm some of the answer to make sure I don't get it wrong.
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,458
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Check this thread:
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=117814 I'm not sure if I tested it but I think you wont get CZ contact from under the layer. It should be possible and zones of focused sound should go deep. But it's quite complicated, and what more it depends on frequency a lot. As for DW, I simply suggest you try it. My guess is they won't go under the layer.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|