![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,169
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Depth-charged to Kingdom Come
Posts: 927
Downloads: 28
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
She's a beauty alright!
![]() But the C-130 Hercules can haul more goods! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,874
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I remember walking around a mockup of the RAF's Future Large Aircraft at Farnborough 1994. This plane's been a long time coming.
Rifleman - the A400m can haul 37 tonnes, the C-130 33. Not much of a difference, mind.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Depth-charged to Kingdom Come
Posts: 927
Downloads: 28
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Oops!
![]() Just looked at Wikipedia and looked at the A400M's Maximum Payload and compared it with the C-130H's Maximum Takeoff Weight and confused the two! Sorry! ![]() But to remind you of some troubles at Airbus, they entered a bid with the Canadians but they failed and the Canadians instead bought C-130J's and C-17s. ![]() I antagonize with Airbus so much because of the 2-year delays and the incessant showing of reruns featuring the A380 in Discovery Channel Asia! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Banana Republic of Germany
Posts: 6,170
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
IIRC Boeing has some problems with delays too, don't they?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
Eight blades per engine.
Interesting design, hope it serves the various militaries well
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bolton, UK
Posts: 1,236
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Does anyone have any info about the thinking behind that? I'm assuming its for efficiency reasons.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|