SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Modern-Era Subsims > Dangerous Waters
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-07-07, 06:52 PM   #1
Blacklight
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,507
Downloads: 145
Uploads: 0
Default Real Life Torpedo loading

I've often wondered this. When my friend was giving me the tour of the sub he worked on (the San Juan (688i class)). When we were in the torpedo room, it looked like the tubes could be loaded pretty quickly (to my civilian, completely non naval eyes). It looked like it was just a case of openening the hatch, having the boys just shove the torpedo in there, and closing up the hatch.
Why does loading a tube take so long ? What process do they have to go through ? :hmm:
Just curious.
__________________
Be my friend or be a mushroom cloud.
"I am coming at you. You will explode in a couple of minutes !"
Blacklight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-07, 10:10 PM   #2
Bill Nichols
Master of Defense
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,502
Downloads: 125
Uploads: 0
Default

Of course you have to hook up the cables for connecting the torpedo to the fire control system, and the wire for wire-guidance. After that you do checks to ensure everything is hooked-up correctly and the torpedo is healthy.
__________________
My Dangerous Waters website:
Bill Nichols is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-07, 10:18 PM   #3
Chock
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Under a thermal layer in chilly Olde England
Posts: 1,842
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

I presume there would have to be some coordination with the people controlling the boat's ballast too, since an ADCAP weighs around three and half thousand pounds, so I imagine it would affect the boat's trim when it was shifted into the tube, thus doing it slower would allow the compensation in trim to be more carefully controlled (this is just a guess by the way, but it seems logical).

Chock
__________________
Chock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-07, 12:23 AM   #4
Sea Demon
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,552
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chock
I presume there would have to be some coordination with the people controlling the boat's ballast too, since an ADCAP weighs around three and half thousand pounds, so I imagine it would affect the boat's trim when it was shifted into the tube, thus doing it slower would allow the compensation in trim to be more carefully controlled (this is just a guess by the way, but it seems logical).

Chock
I hadn't thought of that. And it does bring up an interesting question. But if that is the case, then what happens to trim once the weapon is launched and you're suddenly lighter up front? :hmm:
Sea Demon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-07, 12:51 AM   #5
Sonoboy
Planesman
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United States, CA
Posts: 195
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Demon
I hadn't thought of that. And it does bring up an interesting question. But if that is the case, then what happens to trim once the weapon is launched and you're suddenly lighter up front? :hmm:
Don't be near periscope depth?


Be careful with big weapons all
In this cramped torpedo room
Should one slip and fall "You killed us all!"
The torpedo says "KABOOM!"
:rotfl:
Sonoboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-07, 01:40 AM   #6
Rip
Commodore
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Right behind you!
Posts: 643
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 0
Default

The weight of the fishmoving from in the rack to tube stowed isn't that big a deal as the distance moved forward isn't that far. Even 3ooo moved from bow to stern only effects trim under 5kts. It is accounted for and compensated by the COW. there is also the moving of water for flooding and draining the tubes. There are numerous weight effect evolutions every day. Each coordinated and compensated for. From pumping the **** tanks to making water.

The loading of weapoms into the tube also rquires hooking and unhooking starps and hydraulic rams the manipulate/secure the weapon not to mention needing to pivot the trays to allow for the slight outward angle of the tubes. A shapr weapons loading team can load one pretty fast though. But they always excersize a good dose of caution as is required by the procedures.

Definately a lot less back breaking than loading them without the hydraulic "rabbits" though.
Rip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-08, 01:44 AM   #7
TopTorp '92
Loader
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 84
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacklight
Why does loading a tube take so long ? What process do they have to go through ? :hmm:
Just curious.
We did loads/reloads in 8 min or less. It takes long depending on the number of team members present. Experience plays the decisive role.

Ordinance Document (OD) 44979 spells out the procedure.

During the tube loading procedure the torpedoman must remove the exploder safety screw. That screw is what prevents the warhead from arming while the torpedo sits anywhere outside the tube (like on the rack or somewhere on the pier.) The idea was to prevent the torpedo from arming in a hot-run situation. It sticks out by about 1/2'' or so. Failure to remove the screw will result in a sheered screw virtually impossible to remove by any allowable means AND it turns a mult-million dollar weapon into a dud. I've read and heard stories about a torpedoman using an electric drill on the exploder to remove the carcas. Highly illegal according to the OD 44979 and potentially suicidal for the submarine to do so. Do you REALLY want to create excessive vibrations in the exploder of a warhead? Didn't think so.

Once the torpedo has been tube loaded, the arming rod is kept in check by the inner walls of the tube. So, here too it is impossible for the exploder to arm while inside the tube.

Then the fire control team will test the torpedo communication link by applying power and following an additional OD 44979 procedure. Analog MK-48 took longer while digital ADCAP was/is faster (fewer moving parts.)

Top Torp
TopTorp '92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.