![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,507
Downloads: 145
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I've often wondered this. When my friend was giving me the tour of the sub he worked on (the San Juan (688i class)). When we were in the torpedo room, it looked like the tubes could be loaded pretty quickly (to my civilian, completely non naval eyes). It looked like it was just a case of openening the hatch, having the boys just shove the torpedo in there, and closing up the hatch.
Why does loading a tube take so long ? What process do they have to go through ? :hmm: Just curious.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Master of Defense
![]() Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,502
Downloads: 125
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Of course you have to hook up the cables for connecting the torpedo to the fire control system, and the wire for wire-guidance. After that you do checks to ensure everything is hooked-up correctly and the torpedo is healthy.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Under a thermal layer in chilly Olde England
Posts: 1,842
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I presume there would have to be some coordination with the people controlling the boat's ballast too, since an ADCAP weighs around three and half thousand pounds, so I imagine it would affect the boat's trim when it was shifted into the tube, thus doing it slower would allow the compensation in trim to be more carefully controlled (this is just a guess by the way, but it seems logical).
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,552
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United States, CA
Posts: 195
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Be careful with big weapons all In this cramped torpedo room Should one slip and fall "You killed us all!" The torpedo says "KABOOM!" ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Right behind you!
Posts: 643
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The weight of the fishmoving from in the rack to tube stowed isn't that big a deal as the distance moved forward isn't that far. Even 3ooo moved from bow to stern only effects trim under 5kts. It is accounted for and compensated by the COW. there is also the moving of water for flooding and draining the tubes. There are numerous weight effect evolutions every day. Each coordinated and compensated for. From pumping the **** tanks to making water.
The loading of weapoms into the tube also rquires hooking and unhooking starps and hydraulic rams the manipulate/secure the weapon not to mention needing to pivot the trays to allow for the slight outward angle of the tubes. A shapr weapons loading team can load one pretty fast though. But they always excersize a good dose of caution as is required by the procedures. Definately a lot less back breaking than loading them without the hydraulic "rabbits" though. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Loader
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 84
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Ordinance Document (OD) 44979 spells out the procedure. During the tube loading procedure the torpedoman must remove the exploder safety screw. That screw is what prevents the warhead from arming while the torpedo sits anywhere outside the tube (like on the rack or somewhere on the pier.) The idea was to prevent the torpedo from arming in a hot-run situation. It sticks out by about 1/2'' or so. Failure to remove the screw will result in a sheered screw virtually impossible to remove by any allowable means AND it turns a mult-million dollar weapon into a dud. I've read and heard stories about a torpedoman using an electric drill on the exploder to remove the carcas. Highly illegal according to the OD 44979 and potentially suicidal for the submarine to do so. Do you REALLY want to create excessive vibrations in the exploder of a warhead? Didn't think so. Once the torpedo has been tube loaded, the arming rod is kept in check by the inner walls of the tube. So, here too it is impossible for the exploder to arm while inside the tube. Then the fire control team will test the torpedo communication link by applying power and following an additional OD 44979 procedure. Analog MK-48 took longer while digital ADCAP was/is faster (fewer moving parts.) Top Torp |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|