![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Mate
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 60
Downloads: 18
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Currently it's 1940 and I have the type VIIC.
upgraded engine, batteries, sonar, and dual machine gun. I'm running a stock game except the commander mod. When can I get the U-Flack? only with VIIC? can anyone list the pros and cons of each boat? I know the type IX is bigger, and has slower dive time, but more fuel. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: York. Northern England.
Posts: 1,004
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
In calm water the type IX is a little slower than the VII, but not too much. In rough seas however it is much slower.
You get more external torpedos with the IX which is fine in the early war years, but later it becomes redundant because loading externals becomes impossible. It's worth thinking about switching back to the VII for the late war years because of that.
__________________
![]() Fate opposes me in vitality and morality, forced ever onward, burdened, always in shackles. So this very moment, without tarrying, pluck the quivering strings. Because fate punishes the one who plays, all lament with me. (http://hosted.filefront.com/KatherineRowan) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 392
Downloads: 47
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
GWX v3.0 Gold, Commander v3.2. WINDOWS 10, G3258 @ 3.8Ghz, 8GB RAM, GTX 960 2Gb. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: York. Northern England.
Posts: 1,004
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
With aircraft and radar loading externals is very risky. So far I have only survived to October 41 with the IXC in GWX 1.03.
__________________
![]() Fate opposes me in vitality and morality, forced ever onward, burdened, always in shackles. So this very moment, without tarrying, pluck the quivering strings. Because fate punishes the one who plays, all lament with me. (http://hosted.filefront.com/KatherineRowan) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 392
Downloads: 47
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
GWX v3.0 Gold, Commander v3.2. WINDOWS 10, G3258 @ 3.8Ghz, 8GB RAM, GTX 960 2Gb. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: mississippi
Posts: 190
Downloads: 51
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Jully 1944
In my 4th mission with an IXD2, had 19 missions in an IXB before that, i don't consider loading torps from the deck any more dangerous than charging 1's batteries. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Medic
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kentucky, USA
Posts: 160
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,050
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The IX subs are bigger, faster, go further and carry more eels and more flak early on but they're slower to dive, less maneuvarable when submerged, and larger so far easier to find by active sonar.
It's a tradeoff, for long patrols to exotic places, take the IX, you can still take on convoys and yes, even harbor raid with it but it's trickier for your basic "battle of the atlantic" or for you rabid raiders out there, I'd say the VIIc I personally like the IXb best, not too big, still goes a long way and has a lot of eels ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Eternal Patrol
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,398
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
just be completely out of contact when you start and dont be in a known traffic area. M |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|