![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/08/wa...hp&oref=slogin
Personally, I think the Bush Adminstration did the right thing. Leaders in a terrorist organization are not usually critical, and relations with Pakistan are definitely more important.
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface. http://www.hackworth.com/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 2,537
Downloads: 129
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Of course the story on Pakistan and terrorism as far as its relavent to this topic goes all the way back to the Soviet Occupation of Afghanistan when Pakistan was given permission and funds to support insurgencies there. It lead to the Taliban and of course any of the side treks associated with that regime. It doesn't matter which president was in power, it always seems that America's former allies turn into enemies or threats of some kind.
But I will say... if the Bushies made the right call on this its a first for them in the region. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|