SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-07, 04:31 PM   #1
TheOx
Watch
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
Default Premature Detonation and Other Mysteries

Q1:Ok, whats up with 75% of my torps detonating before the target. They're going off faster than me at the junior prom. :p

Q2: Is damage adjusted for ships in port? I put 5 torps into a tanker in port and it caught a little fire, but no sinking.

Q3: Does the magnetic influence actually work? I have put several torps under the keel a la SHIII with no joy. Only contact detonation.


on 100% Realism with RFB 1.28
TheOx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-07, 04:56 PM   #2
John Channing
Sea Lord
 
John Channing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Posts: 1,846
Downloads: 163
Uploads: 5
Default

1) This is historically correct. If you are using mag det. then premature detonations were the norm, especially in rough seas. By '43 they deactivated them (sorry to hear about that whole "prom" thing. Hope the tux was rented).

2) I think they just continue going on, although sinking can be verrrrrry slooooow (I had one tanker that took over an hour).

3) This seems to be a problem with the metric/imperial conversions and (fingers crossed) will be addressed in patch 1.03. Sometimes they work, but, in my experience, rarely. Just like it was in 41-43.

JCC

Last edited by John Channing; 06-17-07 at 06:35 PM.
John Channing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-07, 04:59 PM   #3
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Channing
(sorry to hear about that whole "prom" thing. Hope the tux was rented).
Hahaa. I just spit tea all over my monitor. I am fortunate that it is not rented either.
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-07, 05:48 PM   #4
THE_MASK
Ace of the deep .
 
THE_MASK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,226
Downloads: 901
Uploads: 73


Default

My wife says she hopes i can fix the premature detonation because its annoying .
THE_MASK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-07, 11:16 AM   #5
Julius Caesar
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sober
My wife says she hopes i can fix the premature detonation because its annoying .
lol!
Well, it's better from shooting duds!

Last edited by Julius Caesar; 06-18-07 at 02:44 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-07, 09:52 AM   #6
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Channing
1) This is historically correct. If you are using mag det. then premature detonations were the norm, especially in rough seas. By '43 they deactivated them (sorry to hear about that whole "prom" thing. Hope the tux was rented).

JCC
Yea but 75% ?! Me thinks a wee bit stretching of the truth here.

(We all know nothing happend at the prom )

Last edited by John Channing; 06-18-07 at 01:55 PM.
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-07, 01:55 PM   #7
John Channing
Sea Lord
 
John Channing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Posts: 1,846
Downloads: 163
Uploads: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Channing
1) This is historically correct. If you are using mag det. then premature detonations were the norm, especially in rough seas. By '43 they deactivated them (sorry to hear about that whole "prom" thing. Hope the tux was rented).

JCC
Yea but 75% ?! Me thinks a wee bit stretching of the truth here.

(We all know nothing happend at the prom )
Well I am currently just finishing up "Silent Victory" and while there were no actual stats kept, the feel you get from the patrol reports is that 75% would be on the light side.

(and speak for yourself. My prom night was memorable... for me, anyway!)

JCC
John Channing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-07, 04:08 AM   #8
PepsiCan
Planesman
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 189
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default There's another flaw

Hi

Actually, American torpedoes had multiple flaws. The detonators were buggy, but so was the gyroscope that regulated the depth at which the torpedo ran.

On average, until mid 1943 torpedoes ran about 10-15 feet too deep. That means that that in shallow water, based on the default depth setting in imperial, your torpedo is not running at 6 feet but at 16 - 21 feet. So, it may hit the bottom when fired in shallow water.

There is also a chance, given that the torpedos are running so deep, that they hit a torpedo net. Several users on the forum have reported that they got caught in them and couldn't escape.

Hope that helps.
__________________
===================
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ 2.1Ghz
1Gb RAM
MSI NVidia 6800 128MB
MSI motherboard
Realtek soundcard
Windows XP Pro SP2
===================

Last edited by PepsiCan; 06-20-07 at 09:09 AM.
PepsiCan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-07, 07:27 PM   #9
nomad_delta
Planesman
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 185
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiCan
Hi

Actually, American torpedoes had multiple flaws. The detonators were buggy, but so was the gyroscope that regulated the depth at which the torpedo ran.

On average, until mid 1943 torpedoes ran about 10-15 feet too deep. That means that that in shallow water, based on the default depth setting in imperial, your torpedo is not running at 6 feet but at 16 - 21 feet. So, it may hit the bottom when fired in shallow water.

There is also a chance, given that the torpedos are running so deep, that they hit a torpedo need. Several users on the forum have reported that they got caught in them and couldn't escape.

Hope that helps.
Has anyone actually confirmed that the torpedos running 10-15 feet too deep until mid-1943 is actually modeled in the game? I don't doubt that that was true, historically, but I'm not sure whether the game actually models this accurately.

nomad_delta
nomad_delta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-07, 02:27 PM   #10
CCIP
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Canada
Posts: 8,700
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 2


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Channing
the feel you get from the patrol reports is that 75% would be on the light side.


I'm the one who originally did work on this mod, and that's exactly the figures I was getting. 75% is a fairly light median given how badly the torps were screwed up until '43...
__________________

There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers.
-Don Van Vliet
(aka Captain Beefheart)
CCIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-07, 01:59 PM   #11
Soundman
Commodore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 617
Downloads: 60
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Channing
1) This is historically correct. If you are using mag det. then premature detonations were the norm, especially in rough seas. By '43 they deactivated them (sorry to hear about that whole "prom" thing. Hope the tux was rented).

JCC
Yea but 75% ?! Me thinks a wee bit stretching of the truth here.

(We all know nothing happend at the prom )
I was in a bad storm the other day and the seas were very rough and visibility was so bad that even when using external views from as close as the camera would allow, it was very difficult to ID the ship I was hunting. After getting a solution by way of sonar, (using visual was impossible) I fired four fish. Three out of four prematurely detonated. I though it was a fluke, so I tried it again with the same result. I tried again, only changed depth, and this time there were no preemie's (how's that for a term ) I wish I could say if I went deeper or more shallow, but I can't recall. Apparently, rough weather is a factor here. BTW..The third time all four fish hit. I was so proud of myself, as this was my first attempt targeting only by sonar while remaing submerged. THAT was a blast!
Soundman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-07, 04:56 PM   #12
Redwine
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Martin de los Andes, Neuquen, , Argentina.
Posts: 1,962
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOx
Q1:Ok, whats up with 75% of my torps detonating before the target. They're going off faster than me at the junior prom. :p
It happens often inn heavy seas, even when you have "dud torpedoes" option unchecked.
There are many parameters to adjust into the files related to the torpedo reliability, you can play tweaking them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOx
Q2: Is damage adjusted for ships in port? I put 5 torps into a tanker in port and it caught a little fire, but no sinking.
Was you in campaign ? Into campaign there are some ships ... flolky called "unsinkable ships"... they are not filled with cargo, ammo, fuel and they are not empty neither...

I was not able to discover what are they...

If you buld a siongle mission, with the mission editor, all cargo options reacts well to the adjusted settings, but in campaign seems to be an "extra" option... those ships are very hard to sink...

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOx
Q3: Does the magnetic influence actually work? I have put several torps under the keel a la SHIII with no joy. Only contact detonation.
By default the detonation range for magnetic pistols are 2 meters, if the torp was out of this range, it is correct to not explode.
But you are right, there are many more settings related to the pistol and torp reliability, in SH IV magnetics seems to be not so good as in example into SH III.

Redwine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-07, 05:53 PM   #13
ReallyDedPoet
Canadian Wolf
 
ReallyDedPoet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada. The one and only, East Coast
Posts: 10,890
Downloads: 946
Uploads: 5


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOx
Q1:Ok, whats up with 75% of my torps detonating before the target. They're going off faster than me at the junior prom. :p
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
__________________

Back in the Day



ReallyDedPoet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-07, 05:55 PM   #14
Powerthighs
Beach Leaf
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 287
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
Default

Regarding magnetic detonators, see this post:

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...2&postcount=42

It appears they don't work at all. When they do detonate, it seems to be due to contact hits only.
Powerthighs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-07, 07:11 PM   #15
juedes7dt
Swabbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

I think one of the problems with sinking ships in port is that it is very shallow. I noticed the same thing when I was attacking ships in port. I would look under the water with the external cam and the bow or stern would be sitting on the sea floor, yet the majority of the boat would still be above water. You have to actually blow them up to get the kill in my experience. Which, unfortunately, can take quite a few fish. I would try aiming for the weak spots in a ship to lessen the number of fish required.
juedes7dt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.