![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right in the middle of it...
Posts: 94
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Is there a blind area behind a sub, even if it has a TA? I came across the game manual of "688 Attack Sub" (anyone remembers it?) according to which a sub with TA had a blind area approx. 45degs wide, in its baffles.
Recalling the "crazy ivan" maneuver of red october i wonder what exactly is the fact in RL. Personally I can't imagine the situation where USS Dallas went all stop and worried about "...bumping on the enemy sub" because they were that close...! The russian crew should all get reassigned to kitchen duties. So, what is fact and what is fiction? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
The reason for a TA is so a submarine can see behind it if you look at the kilo theres a black patch about 45 degrees behind where it is totaly blind, back in the cold war days russian submarines didnt have towed arrays so in order to get around and see if there was any one following was to do a crazy ivan.
The idea was if the enamy submarine was moving they would be close enough to detect the americans grew wise to it so SOP ment to stop and shut everything not nessasery down to avoid detection. Whats more a crazy ivan is where a submarine will double back at high speed to see if your there immagine the 48,000 tonne typhoon doing that and slamming into a 688 at full pelt (30 knots) the 688 would be smashed to bits and sunk easily the phoon would have fair damage but could remain afloat due to thier hull design and 19 water tight compartments, but thats the reason.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right in the middle of it...
Posts: 94
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Didn't the typhoons have TAs back then? That could explain it.
![]() All the same though... It should take a heck of a good crew to bring your sub so close to the enemy undetected (pinpointing its location that well in 3D) ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 185
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
What an entertaining thread.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
Typhoons only aquired the towed array in the mid to late 80's by then the only other subs trailing towed arrays fully were the vic III's sierras and akulas so im told.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,144
Downloads: 54
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Nemo
__________________
"I'm afraid there is no disguising the fact that King's obsession with the Pacific and the Battle of Washington cost us dear in the Battle of the Atlantic". Sir John Slessor GCB, DSO, MC, DL AOC-in-C Coastal Command RAF ___________________________________________ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,458
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
:rotfl: |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|