![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#2731 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere else now
Posts: 1,740
Downloads: 825
Uploads: 4
|
![]()
WOW!! what a great pic
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2732 | ||
Seaman
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 37
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#2733 |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 617
Downloads: 60
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The 152 patch link appears to be broken. It is taking me to the Filefront home page.
__________________
![]() RVAH-9 RA-5C Vigilante at NAS Sanford, Fl 1966 The coolest plane few have heard of! |
![]() |
![]() |
#2734 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 3,610
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 5
|
![]() Quote:
![]() We just barely started testing Real Environment a couple of days ago. It will take some work and adjustment to the sensors to make the mod fully function how it's supposed to. Frame rate hit so far seems to be negligible, at least for myself (running an ATI 4870, 4 GB RAM, Core I7 940). Oh yeah, and to answer my trivia question above: yes, we hacked off the jackstaff and the cable that was running to it. You'll see some similar modifications to the Salmon, Sargo, and S Class boats as well.
__________________
![]() ROW Sound Effects Contributor RFB Team Leader |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2735 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 3,610
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 5
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() ROW Sound Effects Contributor RFB Team Leader |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2736 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 5,421
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
LukeFF I love your RFB man nice job and it looks really great with W_Clears enviromental mod gald to see that you are considering adding it next time around. I really love the ship damage system to me that makes your supermod stand out and shine. I noticed that there is an ice cream machine it the damage control list does it effect morale if it gets destroyed?
![]() P.S. mot sure why some say that RFB is a hit on frame rate not an issue for and I dont have a top of the line machine.(though I do have a quad core cpu) |
![]() |
![]() |
#2737 |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 617
Downloads: 60
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
WOW!... I was just reading a few threads back on this debate between RR and Oleg, sometimes AVG.. You know, everyone makes good points IMO. Of course we must respect all of our beloved modders time and effort, but in a perfect world I can see where Oleg is coming from. From the perspective that gameplay and eyecandy are two different animals, why not offer a "gameplay only" RFB (or TMO) and another version with both gameplay and the visual mods included. The problem seems to lie in the time and effort a modder has available and avoiding the confusion we all have, figuring out what mod is compatible with one another.
However... I can see an even more perfect world...and the person who could pull this off would be a (pardon my expression) a "Mod God" so to speak, in this community. Let me expound... I'm sure many of us "Sim Fanatics" here have also dabbled a bit with flightsims and played Falcon 4.0, a true, great simulation. Well, how many can remember when "Superpack 3" came about and then we had the "BMS F4 Configuration Editor". This was a fantastic addition allowing the flexibility to open this utility up and there you could see all of the different mods available. All you needed to do was put a check mark next to the modification of your choice and start the game and BAM ... you played it the way you wanted. Now I realize this is not Falcon 4.0 and things may be a bit more complicated with this simulation, but with the talent I have witnessed inside this forum, I find it hard to believe something along these lines can't be accomplished and think this could be the answer to all our SH4 prayers. Yes, it would be a major undertaking, but if this could be done it would allieviate the problems of what mod works with what mod, how much eye candy do you want, and in general, how do YOU wish to play the game AND allow you to do it. Yes, maybe I'm dreaming, but it's a nice one ! ![]() I honestly believe something along these lines desperately needs to happen. We have some really great mods out there and even the best of them get critisism for some small detail. It would seem obvious that what the subsim community really desires, is the flexibility to mold the game into each individuals own vision of reality, not neccessarily what the modders may invision in their world.
__________________
![]() RVAH-9 RA-5C Vigilante at NAS Sanford, Fl 1966 The coolest plane few have heard of! Last edited by Soundman; 02-23-09 at 10:53 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2738 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
Soundman, the problem is that this stuff all interacts. The environment mods change the way the sensors work. That changes, well, everything. Given that the AI changes based on AI skill level are hard-coded, such a change could possibly (not likely, but just for the sake of argument) require all the skill levels in the campaign to be tweaked.
The ONLY way to test this... is playing it. Every single enviro patch... fubars everything else. The only way for the enviro-guys to be compatible is to make their mod strictly RFB compatible... it's a can of worms, sadly. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2739 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Notify command we have entered the Grass Sea
Posts: 2,822
Downloads: 813
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I have the current RFB mod and patch and the current, correct RSRDC mod and patch. I now have DECK guns...finally. I have a Digital_Trucker custom boat -- a Gar. At sea the boat's emblem, boat's number and kills are pasted on the boat. However, in port at the beginning of a mission my boat's (USS GAR) name and number is not recognized, nor is my handle. What is up with this? Can it be an RFB mod problem?
I have wasted several days figuring out I had no deck guns because the links in RFB to RSRDC were to out of date RSRDC files. Apparently, RFB has eliminated those links. In any event, I would like to know if there is any way to fix the problems I am experiencing in port at commencement of a mission? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2740 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Notify command we have entered the Grass Sea
Posts: 2,822
Downloads: 813
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I have a deck gun and an anti aircraft gun. The anti aircraft gun is manned by a couple of men. However, the slots for the men to fill are behind the ship's dials. It is hard/impossible to fill the slots and I have one gunner who I can extract to his original positon inside the boat. What is the story/remedy? My screen, which is 14 - 15 inches is set to 1280 x 920 resolution?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2741 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Somewhere over there
Posts: 834
Downloads: 46
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I have decided to leave TMO and try RFB+RSDC, but this plan was stopped by the inability to acquire the patch. Filefront just directs me to their main page.
Thought you should know. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2742 | ||
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Suomi, sauna, puukko, perkele
Posts: 2,346
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#2743 | |||
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Notify command we have entered the Grass Sea
Posts: 2,822
Downloads: 813
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#2744 | |||
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Notify command we have entered the Grass Sea
Posts: 2,822
Downloads: 813
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#2745 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Suomi, sauna, puukko, perkele
Posts: 2,346
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
It's kind of impossible that someone removed the links a few days ago if the post has been edited in January, that's what I was trying to say.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|