SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Modern-Era Subsims > Dangerous Waters
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-06, 03:56 PM   #1
Deadeye313
Bosun
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 61
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default 1.03 reaction thread

Well, it's time for a big reaction thread and since noone else has started one yet I'll go first.

I only played one level after getting the patch so far: the MH-60R demo. I have to say that the hydrophone dipping is back on my list of things to do. I love the speed that it drops and comes back, it makes dipping much less hazardous though you have to be careful not to run the hydrophone into the ground in littoral waters. Other than that, watch out you don't even move when within 10 miles of me.

I'll test out the P-3 and the rest of the MH-60 systems but if this is all they did, then I'm happy.
Deadeye313 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-06, 04:18 PM   #2
OneShot
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 956
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
Default

EDIT : Time for Bed ... looks like I can't read straight anymore
OneShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-06, 04:21 PM   #3
Zerogreat
Electrician's Mate
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Czech Republic, Prague, coordinates are sumthin like 50,10 North 14,25 East, not much accurate
Posts: 132
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

They did, i never had LwAmi installed, but with the new patch dipping sonar seems to stream and retrieve a lot faster
Zerogreat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-06, 04:27 PM   #4
Deadeye313
Bosun
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 61
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

it's so great. It only took like 10 minutes to play the whole demo. I went low, dipped, found him within 20 seconds of dipping and then dropped an active long the line of bearing, ping and drop. I think that was the quickest kill I ever made.

I can't wait to try it in multiplayer.
Deadeye313 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-06, 05:35 PM   #5
HydroShok
Watch
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

I was kinda hoping they would have fixed the "more than 2 missiles at a time" bug in the FFG . Wouldn't surprise me to see new players acciedentally using it online.
__________________
windows messenger tbar91 -at- hotmail -dot- com
|(Q 266 560 832
HydroShok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-06, 07:59 PM   #6
bubblehd647
Watch
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brandon, FL
Posts: 18
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default Ship handling issue 688I

As noted on the other thread, there seems to be a problem with ship handling by the AI when going from deep > shallow. In this screen shot, I've ordered 150ft from 365ft at 2/3 bell. The ship has a 18 deg. DOWN angle at 205'. I paused here to do the screen cap, but it was almost 25 degrees!

The back of my head would be bruised from the Diving Officer smacking me and I'd probably have to re-qualify Helm/Planes.

__________________
ET1/SS (SSN 647, SSN 676)
bubblehd647 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-06, 08:18 PM   #7
Pirate
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oeiras, PORTUGAL
Posts: 258
Downloads: 152
Uploads: 0
Default

Yeah!!! It happens to me too!!!

It's said , after all this time waiting for this final patch and still have this and other bugs so easily discovered...
__________________
Pirate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-06, 08:30 PM   #8
LuftWolf
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Free New York
Posts: 3,167
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
Default

Easily discovered yes, but easily fixed NO.

The physics engine and motion model is VERY complicated now. The results are great when everything works but some things have to be worked out, obviously.

It's not a matter of finding the problem and changing one thing by itself, in something like the submarine motion model for DW changing one aspect of behavior means changing any number of things in the code itself, and then you have to make sure that none of those changes make anything else different in an undesirable way.

Making it exactly the way it should be is a process that right now is closer to being the way it should be than not.
__________________
LW
LuftWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-06, 08:50 PM   #9
Pirate
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oeiras, PORTUGAL
Posts: 258
Downloads: 152
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LuftWolf
Making it exactly the way it should be is a process that right now is closer to being the way it should be than not.
Yes, I don't doubt about that!

Infact I think Dangerous Waters is a very ambitious project.
One that no one else ever dared to try before.

To have a sub, a surface and a 2 completely diferent flying simulations in one sole engine, with this level of detail, must be a very complex achievement.
And for trying this, I admire SCS for it's corage
__________________
Pirate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-06, 09:56 PM   #10
SeaQueen
Naval Royalty
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default Re: 1.03 reaction thread

I want to know where that nice looking cargo ship in the trailor is? It got me all hot and bothered for a nice piece of graphics, and I got disappointed. I hated the cargo ship from the first time I saw it.

It made me happy the the surface duct SSP isn't bizzare anymore, though. I wonder if it will vary seasonally. I need to play with this. :-)
SeaQueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-06, 10:10 PM   #11
bubblehd647
Watch
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brandon, FL
Posts: 18
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LuftWolf
Making it exactly the way it should be is a process that right now is closer to being the way it should be than not.
I wholeheartedly agree!
__________________
ET1/SS (SSN 647, SSN 676)
bubblehd647 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-06, 04:47 AM   #12
Scion
Sailor man
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 47
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default Re: Ship handling issue 688I

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubblehd647
As noted on the other thread, there seems to be a problem with ship handling by the AI when going from deep > shallow. In this screen shot, I've ordered 150ft from 365ft at 2/3 bell. The ship has a 18 deg. DOWN angle at 205'. I paused here to do the screen cap, but it was almost 25 degrees!

The back of my head would be bruised from the Diving Officer smacking me and I'd probably have to re-qualify Helm/Planes.

I havn't played they patched version (seen too much crap on the forums to bother), but judging by that screenshot, it would seem like the cause is that the stern planes have had their effects reversed.

It seems that because the stern planes are showing an up angle, the stern is being pushed up, as opposed to down, as should happen...
Scion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-06, 05:38 AM   #13
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

Which is what you want...

For climb Up angle on Bow Planes, Up angle on Stern planes.

It think the angle is taken from the horizontal and where the pivot is on the planes.

So Bow plane up angle like this \
Stern plane like this /


So if sub is like this <<<<<\===============/>>>>> Submarine will climb and stern should be lower than bow.
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-06, 06:39 AM   #14
Splobb
Swabbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 5
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Well its nice to get the latest patch at last. Unfortunatley they have neglected to fix the AI behaviour of the HELO when you are playing as FFG. That is, not being able to use its dipping sonar. I was really hoping this would be fixed as I feel it handicaps the platform somewhat and reaaly affects gameplay. Ah well...will have to wait for the next one I guess.
Splobb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-06, 06:46 AM   #15
Pirate
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oeiras, PORTUGAL
Posts: 258
Downloads: 152
Uploads: 0
Default

Sterns planes are correct.
The sub just decelerates and rises backwards!
__________________
Pirate is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.