Anyone here invest in stocks?

Wildcat · 07-05-17, 11:15 PM

What's your method, what are your favorite stocks, and how did you learn the market?

I basically have 3 "mentors" - Benjamin Graham, Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch. I use a combination of value and value-growth investing.

My favorite stocks (no particular names) are companies that produce or handle primarily a single product or service that relates to a single or several related products, have few rivals and that have share prices below what the company value is worth.

I tend to watch undervalued companies closely to avoid getting sucked into value traps but buy in when losses start creeping closer to profits, or when profits start to go up after management changes. I buy with intent to hold for years at a time and check up on the stocks every few months at the quarterly reports and don't generally worry about sinking prices unless the reports start to show that the company's book value is significantly changing for the worse.

I trade on the US, Canada, HK and Japanese markets.

What about you guys?

Skybird · 07-06-17, 08:17 AM

I did, and for very good profit in the past, but I meanwhile have completely withdrawn my assets from the paper market and vulnerabilities of mobile/online banking businesses (the only realistic way, more or less, in Germany to pick single stocks instead of needing to buy complete fonds and packages where a bank want to sell you some bonbons packed in plenty of toxic waste.

Graham is a basis, yes, but I recommend also the biography about Guy Spear to learn a bit about the rotten morals in today's business and how to do these things maybe better without needing to sell your soul. I personally based on Austrian economics school, which of course is the basis and quite close to socalled value investing. John Mihaljevic also is a good name to read. But best is to learn to get a thorough understanding of the reasons so called Austrian economics are basing on.

I do not discuss for priciple reasons specific tasks, brands, companies, stocks in public.

However, a warning, that is why I have pulled out and went from "investing" to "securing". Any investment strategy is the condensate of empirical experiences from the past. Any advise formulated on grounds of such investment strategies bases on the preassumption that the environment and the conditions that define it and in which past experiences formed up and repeated themselves, is still intact. And this is what I doubt. Our raping of the profound fundament for a reasonable monetarian system, our idea of money, has led us to a situation where the trusting into rules of the pastr more and more is not reasonably justified, but takes the character of mere gambles, of kick and rush. We base on rules of advise there that were valid for the eocnomic world of the past decades, but that is not like that anymore, but troubling sick and tottering. Possible that if somewobdy buys sticks today, he gets away with it, and makes a good profit still. But also possible that despite the good reasons he had to buy these and noi other stocks, the monetarian distortions will all of a sudden erupt, and render the basis for the advise he trusted in as pointless. You canbot formulate trustworthy confgidence assessments there anymore - and that is what makes it so unpredictable nowadays. There is too much money in the system , by severla factors porbbaly, this money is only credit for which no securities exist, and the reuslt is that people with money desperately went into real assetts and "safe" investments that as a consequences became hopelessly overvalued.

This is no healthy situation. And thus I activated the emergency brake and pulled out. The show could run on for another 5 or 10 years. Or just 6 months, or may collapse already next week - I do not dare any predictions there anymore, took what I had, and transformed it into value formats of which I hope they will survive the coming cataclysm, and which are independent from paper money "value". I am responsible just for myself and have no own family, and assessed that I had enough "money" to hold out in the future and at higher age, and this is now what I try to protect.

If the criminal syndicates called states however change laws and play their enslaving criminal gangster games, this could then turn my decision into a mess. The worst gangster there is in the world, is the state.

The point is there are no more reasonable risk assessments and calculations possible anymore today, and there are no ore reaosnably safe oiptions left. They have turned the general system environment into such a messy mess that everything nowadays is a maximum risk for investors, savers, or whomever.

And this is what makes this all such a monumental, bloody crime. There are no safe otpions anymore, and no advise and rules form the past that can be trusted anymore. You need to accept gambling. And that is the opposite of investing.

Those index fonds and ETFs everybody speaks of, will become one of the major warheads impacting on the markets ooner or later, right because they are what they are. The inner dynamic and self-automatization these things include and cause on the stock market, does not get correctly understood and assessed. The more people buy these things, the more dangerous they become, and the more instabile the situation becomes.

I do not want to be young again in these years. The generation after the war had it much, much easier.

Investing on grounds of Austrian economics means that you run the risk of of bailling out too early, and going in too late. This is an implicit characteristic, yes. One has to weigh this against the incalculatable and unforseeable risks today's market environment necessarily present. You may loose a little, but increase your chances to not get hit by the big blow. State debts are higher than ever before, paper money is more useless than ever before, the crisis is worse than ever before. As you can conclude from all what I said here, I recommend maximum caution and a very defensive approach nowadays. Be careful. The makret environment is not as safe and stable anymore as past investment rules depend on in order to be trustworthy. In other words: the old virtues and tips and advice may not be as useful anymore as books make you think. Its very risky ground now. Thanks to paper money wars.

Jimbuna · 07-06-17, 08:29 AM

I invested for many years in the past with some some considerable success if I say so myself but in the latter years I looked to consolidate my gains and went for those who gave above average share dividends.

I'm now fast approaching sixty years of age so have switched all my investments into guaranteed fixed interest accounts, the returns are lower but the guarantee is of paramount importance and you also have here in the UK the 85k per institution guarantee underwritten by the FSCS (Financial Services Compensation Scheme).

Skybird · 07-06-17, 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimbuna

you also have here in the UK the 85k per institution guarantee underwritten by the FSCS (Financial Services Compensation Scheme).

If that is what in German would be called "Einlagensicherung", then keep on mind before you put all your trust into that that Merkel some years ago, when the symptoms of the crisis hit the fan after 2007/2008, told the Germans that all their private savings' safety were to be guaranteed by the state. It meanwhile got amditted that she lied, of course. The state cannot guarantee that in case there is a bank run, the safeties are enough only to pay out less than 2% of the savings on private banking accounts. In principle that is not different in any other country.

Money reforms and money devaluation not even considered.

Too many debts, too many interests services. The situation has degenerated beyond being hopeless. The world will not get out of this without a major shakeup. All credits go to the FIAT money system.

Jimbuna · 07-06-17, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skybird

If that is what in German would be called "Einlagensicherung", then keep on mind before you put all your trust into that that Merkel some years ago, when the symptoms of the crisis hit the fan after 2007/2008, told the Germans that all their private savings' safety were to be guaranteed by the state. It meanwhile got amditted that she lied, of course. The state cannot guarantee that in case there is a bank run, the safeties are enough only to pay out less than 2% of the savings on private banking accounts. In principle that is not different in any other country.

Money reforms and money devaluation not even considered.

Too many debts, too many interests services. The situation has degenerated beyond being hopeless. The world will not get out of this without a major shakeup. All credits go to the FIAT money system.

Information on the UK FSCS here Sky:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financ...nsation_Scheme

Skybird · 07-06-17, 10:42 AM

I see, and what I talked about in Germany and other countries, is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deposit_insurance The principle base question in both models is the same: to what degree can such a guarantee finance financial collapse of other institutions, or the system. Obviously the reach is limited in case of a bank run. Safeties like this help if just one bank falls, or one investment company. If the whole system is at risk, than Sayonara. And that is a very real danger. FIAT money. Its brain cancer, bone cancer, blood cancer and pancreas cancer all in one.

Aktungbby · 07-06-17, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimbuna

Information on the UK FSCS here Sky:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financ...nsation_Scheme

NONSENSE!

We know the truth Jimbuna

: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banks_in_Guernsey In this day and age, a little 'off shore' banking is utterly necessary to one's fiduciary desmene; away from the perils of the all-seeing all-grabby neo-socialist state!

As for me... alas none of my offspring travel about on ships to be my courier

! https://www.sovereignman.com/offshore-bank-account/ ...<My only hope before moving to Costa Rica!

No wonder my 'Colon' aches: https://www.mataf.net/en/currency/converter-USD-CRC?m1=100

Aktungbby · 07-06-17, 09:20 AM

^YEAH that! I learned at my dad's knee and he also was into commodities. I still use his broker. Three years ago I rolled a bunch of Oil, Coca cola, Heinz, GM, tobacco, and other long time held family stuff into long, middle, and short-term very reliable mutual funds as an 'in-kind transfer' to avoid taxes. Essentially 'fire and keep-a-light-eye' into the hands of my wife's own 'deferred comp' retirement investment counselor. He was for aggressive acquisition but I nixed in favor of extremely conservative 5-7% growth with no headaches ....please. In my sixties, as Jimbuna points out, is a key decision maker. The objective is actually not for me but for heirs to the estate

at this point. I 've done in-house security in day-trading rooms in brokerages and wasn't impressed with the life style. I read the Wall Street Journal every day(info thus always a day late

) and, as the OP indicates, follow the lead of mentor Warren Buffet who is heavy in B of A, Wells Fargo, airlines, and oil at present. His Berkshire Hathaway stock:

Quote:

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate holding company headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska, United States. The company wholly owns GEICO, BNSF Railway, Lubrizol, Fruit of the Loom, Helzberg Diamonds, FlightSafety International, Pampered Chef, and NetJets, and also owns 26.7% of the Kraft Heinz Company, and significant minority holdings in American Express (17.0%), The Coca-Cola Company (9.4%), Wells Fargo (9.9%), IBM (6.9%) and Apple (2.5%).[2] Since 2016, the company has acquired large holdings in the major US airline carriers and is currently the largest shareholder in United Airlines and Delta Air Lines and a top 3 shareholder in Southwest Airlines and American Airlines. Berkshire Hathaway has averaged an annual growth in book value of 19.0% to its shareholders since 1965 (compared to 9.7% from the S&P 500 with dividends included.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Buffett

Very tempting rate of return: but at more than $240 K per single share, way too much to tie up in a single place portfolio-wise for oldie me. Better just to watch and consider; the more so as Mr. Buffett is 86 years old and I consider that his passing will have an deleterious effect on his stock's otherwise superb value....

My primary financial goals: don't starve, keep the house up, and keep up my

contribution!

07-05-17, 11:15 PM	#1
Wildcat Engineer Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 215 Downloads: 69 Uploads: 0	Anyone here invest in stocks? What's your method, what are your favorite stocks, and how did you learn the market? I basically have 3 "mentors" - Benjamin Graham, Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch. I use a combination of value and value-growth investing. My favorite stocks (no particular names) are companies that produce or handle primarily a single product or service that relates to a single or several related products, have few rivals and that have share prices below what the company value is worth. I tend to watch undervalued companies closely to avoid getting sucked into value traps but buy in when losses start creeping closer to profits, or when profits start to go up after management changes. I buy with intent to hold for years at a time and check up on the stocks every few months at the quarterly reports and don't generally worry about sinking prices unless the reports start to show that the company's book value is significantly changing for the worse. I trade on the US, Canada, HK and Japanese markets. What about you guys?

07-06-17, 08:17 AM	#2
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 42,621 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	I did, and for very good profit in the past, but I meanwhile have completely withdrawn my assets from the paper market and vulnerabilities of mobile/online banking businesses (the only realistic way, more or less, in Germany to pick single stocks instead of needing to buy complete fonds and packages where a bank want to sell you some bonbons packed in plenty of toxic waste. Graham is a basis, yes, but I recommend also the biography about Guy Spear to learn a bit about the rotten morals in today's business and how to do these things maybe better without needing to sell your soul. I personally based on Austrian economics school, which of course is the basis and quite close to socalled value investing. John Mihaljevic also is a good name to read. But best is to learn to get a thorough understanding of the reasons so called Austrian economics are basing on. I do not discuss for priciple reasons specific tasks, brands, companies, stocks in public. However, a warning, that is why I have pulled out and went from "investing" to "securing". Any investment strategy is the condensate of empirical experiences from the past. Any advise formulated on grounds of such investment strategies bases on the preassumption that the environment and the conditions that define it and in which past experiences formed up and repeated themselves, is still intact. And this is what I doubt. Our raping of the profound fundament for a reasonable monetarian system, our idea of money, has led us to a situation where the trusting into rules of the pastr more and more is not reasonably justified, but takes the character of mere gambles, of kick and rush. We base on rules of advise there that were valid for the eocnomic world of the past decades, but that is not like that anymore, but troubling sick and tottering. Possible that if somewobdy buys sticks today, he gets away with it, and makes a good profit still. But also possible that despite the good reasons he had to buy these and noi other stocks, the monetarian distortions will all of a sudden erupt, and render the basis for the advise he trusted in as pointless. You canbot formulate trustworthy confgidence assessments there anymore - and that is what makes it so unpredictable nowadays. There is too much money in the system , by severla factors porbbaly, this money is only credit for which no securities exist, and the reuslt is that people with money desperately went into real assetts and "safe" investments that as a consequences became hopelessly overvalued. This is no healthy situation. And thus I activated the emergency brake and pulled out. The show could run on for another 5 or 10 years. Or just 6 months, or may collapse already next week - I do not dare any predictions there anymore, took what I had, and transformed it into value formats of which I hope they will survive the coming cataclysm, and which are independent from paper money "value". I am responsible just for myself and have no own family, and assessed that I had enough "money" to hold out in the future and at higher age, and this is now what I try to protect. If the criminal syndicates called states however change laws and play their enslaving criminal gangster games, this could then turn my decision into a mess. The worst gangster there is in the world, is the state. The point is there are no more reasonable risk assessments and calculations possible anymore today, and there are no ore reaosnably safe oiptions left. They have turned the general system environment into such a messy mess that everything nowadays is a maximum risk for investors, savers, or whomever. And this is what makes this all such a monumental, bloody crime. There are no safe otpions anymore, and no advise and rules form the past that can be trusted anymore. You need to accept gambling. And that is the opposite of investing. Those index fonds and ETFs everybody speaks of, will become one of the major warheads impacting on the markets ooner or later, right because they are what they are. The inner dynamic and self-automatization these things include and cause on the stock market, does not get correctly understood and assessed. The more people buy these things, the more dangerous they become, and the more instabile the situation becomes. I do not want to be young again in these years. The generation after the war had it much, much easier. Investing on grounds of Austrian economics means that you run the risk of of bailling out too early, and going in too late. This is an implicit characteristic, yes. One has to weigh this against the incalculatable and unforseeable risks today's market environment necessarily present. You may loose a little, but increase your chances to not get hit by the big blow. State debts are higher than ever before, paper money is more useless than ever before, the crisis is worse than ever before. As you can conclude from all what I said here, I recommend maximum caution and a very defensive approach nowadays. Be careful. The makret environment is not as safe and stable anymore as past investment rules depend on in order to be trustworthy. In other words: the old virtues and tips and advice may not be as useful anymore as books make you think. Its very risky ground now. Thanks to paper money wars. __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert. Last edited by Skybird; 07-06-17 at 08:31 AM.

07-06-17, 08:29 AM	#3
Jimbuna Chief of the Boat Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: 250 metres below the surface Posts: 190,525 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 13	I invested for many years in the past with some some considerable success if I say so myself but in the latter years I looked to consolidate my gains and went for those who gave above average share dividends. I'm now fast approaching sixty years of age so have switched all my investments into guaranteed fixed interest accounts, the returns are lower but the guarantee is of paramount importance and you also have here in the UK the 85k per institution guarantee underwritten by the FSCS (Financial Services Compensation Scheme). __________________ Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something. Oh my God, not again!!

07-06-17, 10:42 AM	#6
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 42,621 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	I see, and what I talked about in Germany and other countries, is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deposit_insurance The principle base question in both models is the same: to what degree can such a guarantee finance financial collapse of other institutions, or the system. Obviously the reach is limited in case of a bank run. Safeties like this help if just one bank falls, or one investment company. If the whole system is at risk, than Sayonara. And that is a very real danger. FIAT money. Its brain cancer, bone cancer, blood cancer and pancreas cancer all in one. __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert.