About wiring

[Skybird]

Preaching this since years, and for people even just occasionally reading a bit on neurological and brain science, nothing all that new at all.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-25198063

This will make reality-denying genderists and man-hating ultra-feminists and fascist political correctness fetishists once again fuming. I shall find the sound of popping heads most amusing. There is too much damage done already in legislation and education, coming from denial of essential differences between boy and girl. People do not get born as tabula rasas, and their being of "male" or "female" is not the result of cultural circumstances and education alone.

For the most, typical mentality and cognitive differences are - GENETIC. Considering the very heart of evolution theory, this is again no surprise at all.

[VipertheSniper]

I guess I'd have to read the study itself, but from the reports I've read, the cause for the different wiring wasn't established in the study.

How will the man hating reality defying genderist feminist fascists be having fuminghead popping when they often say that men can't multi task?
Your rant makes no sense, perhaps its your wiring
Anyway I thought all that blank slate stuff was from people like Aristotle Locke and Aquinas, not exactly noted feminist genderists are they?

[Skybird]

The point is it is not the first claiming that there is a material difference on the neurological level. And the other point is that even the established material differences get denied in their existence, to match wanted ideological purposes.

Just watch little children play, girls and boys. They play differently, from early childhood on. And they are interested in different things, from early childhood on. The different playing styles and playing interests correspond with the different roles men and women played over the past several tens of thousands of years. And political ideologists claim that this has not left traces in our genetic code, and can be ignored and denied or treated and manipulated from one century to the next!?



Speaking on the general trend. Single exceptions observed are not suitable to defy a statistically described trend. People who come with a single case description to counter a statistic they do not like, have not understood what a statistic is, and what it does, and what its aim is.

(not meaning you, Viper, but talking generally).

[Tchocky]

Originally Posted by Skybird

This will make reality-denying genderists and man-hating ultra-feminists and fascist political correctness fetishists once again fuming. I shall find the sound of popping heads most amusing.

Have you been hacked by a Skybird parody account?

Originally Posted by Tchocky

Have you been hacked by a Skybird parody account?

Surely a parody account would have included something about the EU and muslims

[VipertheSniper]

So your point is essentially: We can't achieve true equality between all genders in our lifetimes so we might as well not even try?

At least that's what I got out of your little rant.

[Aktungbby]

"Sex related neurological disorders and broad generalizations"...WOLFERTZ!!! take over here! How come when I have a headache, it 's not the same as when she has a headache?

[Aktungbby]

Originally Posted by VipertheSniper

At least that's what I got out of your little rant.

"He rants best who rants last!"

[Jimbuna]

Let's not go stirring the pot or fanning the fire if you please.

[Aktungbby]

I'll qwertiously moderate myself SIRE

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by VipertheSniper

So your point is essentially: We can't achieve true equality between all genders in our lifetimes so we might as well not even try?

At least that's what I got out of your little rant.

I never said that here or elsewhere, nor did I ever indicate that. But we have a tremendous and still growing abuse of boys and men in an education system and a social climate that under influence of feminifascism does not want that much equality before the law, but matriarchalic dominance over the male. Also it must be explained in how far this works hand in hand with left policies to destroy the institution family and replace it with state care, and the offending mothers and the minimising of the life achievement that a mother accomplishes, this again in order to erode the fundament of family life even more.

Some weeks ago I even linked an open letter by a Green (!) politician, a woman, who bitterly attacked her party for having pissed and mocked about mothers and families, calling this one of the key reasons why the Greens lost tremendously in last German elections.

Men and women tick differently. And genderists deny that and claim there are no genetic fundaments for differences but differences all are due to culture and education, and any boy or girl can be made to tick like a boy or girl as desired. And feminists say women tick much better and men are evil tickers. Pointing out the pointlessness and absurdity of this is what you should take from my "rant". Not more, not less.

[Wolferz]

So, the ladies have criss crossed wiring?

Must be why I've met so many who display dual personalities. Sweeter than Bee pollen one minute and raging killer bees the next.

[Tchocky]

Originally Posted by Skybird

I never said that here or elsewhere, nor did I ever indicate that. But we have a tremendous and still growing abuse of boys and men in an education system and a social climate that under influence of feminifascism does not want that much equality before the law, but matriarchalic dominance over the male. Also it must be explained in how far this works hand in hand with left policies to destroy the institution family and replace it with state care, and the offending mothers and the minimising of the life achievement that a mother accomplishes, this again in order to erode the fundament of family life even more.

Some weeks ago I even linked an open letter by a Green (!) politician, a woman, who bitterly attacked her party for having pissed and mocked about mothers and families, calling this one of the key reasons why the Greens lost tremendously in last German elections.

Men and women tick differently. And genderists deny that and claim there are no genetic fundaments for differences but differences all are due to culture and education, and any boy or girl can be made to tick like a boy or girl as desired. And feminists say women tick much better and men are evil tickers. Pointing out the pointlessness and absurdity of this is what you should take from my "rant". Not more, not less.

Stop it, you're killing me!

[VipertheSniper]

I guess I'm not listening to radical enough feminists as I've haven't heard a single word about establishing a matriarchy.
I'm also wondering what that tremendous abuse it is you talk about. If there's a push in schools or in general, the education system, to get boys and men to accept girls and women as their "masters", the radical feminists are doing a very poor job in pushing their agenda.


That ever recurring theme of erosion of family values, destroying of families, letting mothers not be mothers. What you see as an attack on families or mothers, I see as giving them a choice to do what suits them best. It's not like anybody is forcing them to give their child(ren) into day care. If the mother can live with her choice, who's to tell her she's wrong? That's also one thing feminism is fighting for, not shaming women for their choices.



Can't comment on that letter, as it didn't make the news here and I have not read when you posted it, maybe you could provide the link or the name of the politician?

Men and women tick differently. And genderists deny that and claim there are no genetic fundaments for differences but differences all are due to culture and education, and any boy or girl can be made to tick like a boy or girl as desired.

How about some citations? I mean what you wrote sounds patently absurd, I would like to know who, in all seriousness, makes such a claim, which could only be proven if you had free reign to try that out.

And feminists say women tick much better and men are evil tickers.

Feminists say..., yeah all of them or just the most radical? You know to be a feminist, or member of any other group that fights for a cause, you don't have to agree with all views of the most radical to call yourself one of them.