Nanny State Connecticut-Crimes against Homeless a Hate Crime?

[Feuer Frei!]

So someone squats on your property and what do you say? "Get off my land" seems to give the impression that you are a felonious hate criminal. Or so it would appear at first glance:

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Connecticut lawmakers are proposing to add intimidation or harassment of homeless people to the category of hate crimes.
The state House of Representatives passed the bill Thursday by a 112-32 vote. It now moves to the Senate.

One can think it won't pass in the Senate.
Creating privileges to further cement the voting bloc.
There is an agenda and a bias here it would seem.


SOURCE

[Sailor Steve]

It might come to that, but for now it says harrassing or attacking homeless people, as in singling them out for your hate. I don't see it saying anything about telling them to stay off your private property. I think that would come under trespassing laws, and calling the police is always the better choice in that situation anyway.

It will be interesting to see where this goes, but I think you, and most of the posters on that sight, might be jumping the gun a little.

[the_tyrant]

So if I harass some segments of society (homeless, religious minorities) it counts as hate crime, but if I harass everybody else its just normal harassment?

Especially considering that you would probably be punished more harshly if they convict you of hate crime

So someone squats on your property and what do you say? "Get off my land" seems to give the impression that you are a felonious hate criminal. Or so it would appear at first glance:

Since saying "get off my land" isn't a crime if the person has no legal right to be there then saying it to a homeless person also isn't a crime.

So if I harass some segments of society (homeless, religious minorities) it counts as hate crime, but if I harass everybody else its just normal harassment?

If someone attacks someone for being chinese because they hate chinese people it is a hate crime, if they attack someone with no negative mitigating factor then it isn't.

[August]

Originally Posted by the_tyrant

So if I harass some segments of society (homeless, religious minorities) it counts as hate crime, but if I harass everybody else its just normal harassment?

Kinda flies in the face of the concept of equal protection under the law don't it?

[garren]

Originally Posted by August

Kinda flies in the face of the concept of equal protection under the law don't it?

That already happened with VAWA don't you remember? Women are superior beings than men in the eyes of the government and need extra protection from violence despite men being the victims of violence 10x more often than women. Pandering politics is what it's all about today.

Kinda flies in the face of the concept of equal protection under the law don't it?

Not in the slightest.

[Feuer Frei!]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

then saying it to a homeless person also isn't a crime.

Yet.

Yet.

Paranoid much?
Its a vast conspiracy I tell ya.

A crime is a crime, different factors present in the commisioning of a crime give different weight in terms of sentencing. Some give a harsher penalty for the crime, some give a more lenient penalty for the same crime.
That is all this is, nothing more nothing less.

Which means the complaints made here about it read like they belong on the Daily Mail letters of outrage page.

[Feuer Frei!]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Paranoid much?

Far from it.

Its a vast conspiracy I tell ya.

Conspiracy? The vote is before the Senate. No conspiracy.

A crime is a crime, different factors present in the commisioning of a crime give different weight in terms of sentencing. Some give a harsher penalty for the crime, some give a more lenient penalty for the same crime.
That is all this is, nothing more nothing less.

Sure. And that will all come out after the Senate vote.

Which means the complaints made here about it read like they belong on the Daily Mail letters of outrage page.

I can only gather that you are referring to 'complaints' here in this thread.
That's a bit harsh to liken subsim members that have posted in this thread to the daily fail posters who give insightful and invaluable commentary, all the while upholding the utmost maturity and civility.

[Penguin]

Originally Posted by garren

That already happened with VAWA don't you remember? Women are superior beings than men in the eyes of the government and need extra protection from violence despite men being the victims of violence 10x more often than women. Pandering politics is what it's all about today.

So what part of Section 40002 is so hard to understand?
"Nothing in this title shall be construed to prohibit male victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking from receiving benefits
and services under this title."
(source: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-1...9hr3402enr.pdf)

[Wolferz]

They'e just after the scum who promote bum fights.

[AVGWarhawk]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Since saying "get off my land" isn't a crime if the person has no legal right to be there then saying it to a homeless person also isn't a crime.

This wraps it up in a nutshell.

[MH]

So how do you tell homeless women to get off the lawn and not lose the house?

[mookiemookie]

Originally Posted by the_tyrant

So if I harass some segments of society (homeless, religious minorities) it counts as hate crime, but if I harass everybody else its just normal harassment?

Especially considering that you would probably be punished more harshly if they convict you of hate crime

Depends on why you were doing the harassing. Were you harassing the person because they were homeless? Where you harassing the person because they were Jewish? What is the motivating factor behind the crime?

Hate crimes are about the intent behind the crime, not because of the pure chance that someone happens to be a different color or religion than yourself.