SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-11, 09:26 AM   #1
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,602
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default High ranking German general admits military failure in Afghanistan

Not really new for the healthy mind, but still:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/...790539,00.html


Ten Years in Afghanistan

German General Says NATO Mission Has 'Failed'

A top German general who was instrumental in planning the Bundeswehr's mission in Afghanistan has said that the intervention has failed and the Taliban will regain power within months of withdrawal. Ten years after the invasion, he is far from alone with his critique.
It was 10 years ago that the United States, together with its NATO allies, marched into Afghanistan to put an end to Taliban rule and begin the hunt for al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden. A decade later, the terrorist leader is dead. But, says Harald Kujat, former general inspector of the German military, the mission has been a failure.
"The mission fulfilled the political aim of showing solidarity with the United States," Kujat told the German daily Mitteldeutsche Zeitung. "But if you measure progress against the goal of stabilizing a country and a region, then the mission has failed."
Kujat said that it was ignored for too long that "the opponent was fighting a military battle and we needed to do the same." In reference to claims from German political leaders, among others, he said "the argument that it was a stabilization mission was maintained for too long." The result, he said, is that soldiers were not given what they needed in order to effectively fight the enemy.
Kujat is hardly the first to criticize the Afghanistan war. But his words carry weight in Germany. He was a leading planner of the German mission to Afghanistan and served as general inspector of the German military -- the Bundeswehr's highest-ranking soldier -- from 2000 to 2002. Part of his job included advising both the German government and the Defense Ministry on military matters.
Timeline for Withdrawal
The former Bundeswehr leader also took aim at Germany's plan to complete withdrawal of all of its 5,000 combat troops from Afghanistan by 2014, a timeline that was reiterated on Friday by Germany's special representative for Afghanistan, Michael Steiner.
"If we withdraw from Afghanistan in 2014," said Kujat, "then the Taliban will take over power again within just a few months."
Steiner declined to name a date for the beginning of Germany's withdrawal from Afghanistan, but the government of Chancellor Angela Merkel has said it aims at beginning the pullout by the end of 2011, conditions permitting. Steiner said that a plan would be presented by the end of the year.
The withdrawal of NATO forces from Afghanistan was a major topic at a meeting of NATO defense ministers in Brussels on Thursday. NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen of Denmark said that, even after 2014, the alliance would focus heavily on training the Afghan military.
Kujat isn't the only heavyweight critic of the Afghanistan mission to have spoken out in recent days. Speaking in Washington at an event organized by the think tank Council on Foreign Relations, Stanley McChrystal, who led the Afghanistan troop increase ordered by President Barack Obama in 2009, said that the US had a "frighteningly simplistic" view of Afghanistan when the war began. He also said that the US and NATO were only "50 percent of the way" toward achieving the goals they had set for themselves.
Pressuring Pakistan
"We didn't know enough and we still don't know enough," McChrystal said. "Most of us, me included, had a very superficial understanding of the situation and history, and we had a frighteningly simplistic view of recent history, the last 50 years."
Obama on Thursday, increased pressure on neighboring Pakistan, saying that the Islamabad regime's connections with "unsavory characters" had put the country's relationship with the US at risk. Washington has long been urging Pakistan to cease supporting Islamist militant attacks inside Afghanistan, an effort which has been redoubled in the wake of the US killing of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan this spring.
Pakistan fired back on Friday. Salim Saifullah, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee in Pakistan's Senate, told Reuters that "this is not helping either the US, Afghanistan or Pakistan. There will be pressure on the (Pakistani) government to get out of this war (on Islamist militancy)."
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-11, 10:04 AM   #2
JU_88
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 3,803
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
Default

Meh I thought everyone pretty much knew that already - since 2002 even.

Last edited by JU_88; 10-07-11 at 10:35 AM.
JU_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-11, 10:22 AM   #3
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Failure will not be tolerated; send him to the Eastern Front!




__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-11, 10:54 AM   #4
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,461
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Take the troops out of Afghanistan and invade Pakistan...oh yeah I can see that happening
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-11, 12:50 PM   #5
Penguin
Ocean Warrior
 
Penguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Rheinische Republik
Posts: 3,322
Downloads: 92
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike View Post
Failure will not be tolerated; send him to the Eastern Front!


Americans who fail get an even harsher punishment:
Penguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-11, 01:03 PM   #6
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,360
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Since we never really had a clearly defined mission for AF, I guess we couldn't fail could we?

Did we spend a lot of money we didn't have? Check
Did we use this borrowed money to fund the Military Industrial Complex and indirectly politicians? Check
Did we kill a bunch of people we either did not like or care about? Check
Did we secure the TAP pipeline route? Check
Did we take a bunch of reservists and guard and put them on the federal payroll? Check
Did we continue to foster an environment of fear and distrust thereby distracting our citizens from our domestic problems? Check

So where is this failure?
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-11, 01:09 PM   #7
MothBalls
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,012
Downloads: 20
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus View Post
Since we never really had a clearly defined mission for AF, I guess we couldn't fail could we?

Did we spend a lot of money we didn't have? Check
Did we use this borrowed money to fund the Military Industrial Complex and indirectly politicians? Check
Did we kill a bunch of people we either did not like or care about? Check
Did we secure the TAP pipeline route? Check
Did we take a bunch of reservists and guard and put them on the federal payroll? Check
Did we continue to foster an environment of fear and distrust thereby distracting our citizens from our domestic problems? Check

So where is this failure?
Failed to hide the truths you stated above and failed make ourselves look like heroes that saved the world while doing it.
MothBalls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-11, 01:17 PM   #8
Alex
Dominant Wolf
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,143
Downloads: 30
Uploads: 0
Default

Hahaha.
__________________
Alex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-11, 01:25 PM   #9
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,602
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike View Post
Failure will not be tolerated; send him to the Eastern Front!




It already is the front east of us. The next even more Eastern front would be Pakistan, which is our friendly, trustworthy ally, so we do not need a friont there, but more love and understanding.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-11, 01:29 PM   #10
krashkart
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,292
Downloads: 100
Uploads: 0


Default

^^ lol Pakistan is really loving the US these days, aren't they?

I've always had this notion that the only way to win is to maintain a significant presence there while the country builds a new foundation. Apparently, nobody on the planning end of things had the presence of mind to think that far ahead before committing forces to the region. It's pointless to try to rebuild an anarchic state in ten or fifteen years without planning for another ten or fifteen years (or more).



Also, some thoughts from Stanley McChrystal on where things went wrong:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/1..._n_999282.html
__________________
sent from my fingertips using a cheap keyboard
krashkart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-11, 03:52 PM   #11
JU_88
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 3,803
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird View Post
It already is the front east of us. The next even more Eastern front would be Pakistan, which is our friendly, trustworthy ally, so we do not need a friont there, but more love and understanding.
Yes Pakistan have Nukes, so we have to be extra nice to them.
We dont really like to pick on countries that can punch back
JU_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-11, 04:07 PM   #12
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,461
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JU_88 View Post
Yes Pakistan have Nukes, so we have to be extra nice to them.
We dont really like to pick on countries that can punch back
Precisely!!
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-11, 05:00 AM   #13
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,602
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Ten years of Taliban-hunt

from: Der Tagesspiegel
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.