Panetta says U.S. is 'within reach' of defeating Al Qaeda

[Gerald]

The new defense chief says intelligence uncovered in the Bin Laden raid showed that 10 years of U.S. operations against the terror network had left it with fewer than two dozen key operatives. Panetta is visiting Afghanistan for the first time as defense secretary.

Then-CIA Director Leon Panetta with President Obama in May. Panetta's assessment of Al Qaeda comes in the wake of Obama's decision to withdraw 30,000 troops from Afghanistan over the next year.

KABUL, Afghanistan—
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta declared Saturday that the United States is "within reach" of "strategically defeating" Al Qaeda as a terrorist threat, but that doing so would require killing or capturing the group's 10 to 20 remaining leaders.

Arriving in Afghanistan for the first time since taking office earlier this month, Panetta said that intelligence uncovered in the raid that killed Osama bin Laden in May showed that 10 years of U.S. operations against Al Qaeda had left it with fewer than two dozen key operatives, most of whom are in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and North Africa.

"If we can be successful at going after them, I think we can really undermine their ability to do any kind of planning to be able to conduct any kinds of attack on this country," Panetta told reporters on his way to Afghanistan aboard a U.S. Air Force jet. "That's why I think" that defeat of Al Qaeda is "within reach," he added.

Panetta's comments were the most detailed recent assessment of Al Qaeda's strength by a senior U.S. official, and it comes in the wake of President Barack Obama's decision to withdraw 30,000 troops from Afghanistan over the next year and a half, a move that he said was possible in part because of the damage inflicted on Al Qaeda and its allies in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Panetta, a former California congressman who headed the CIA before being chosen by Obama to replace Robert M. Gates at the Pentagon, provided no estimate for how long it might take to defeat Al Qaeda, and he acknowledged that it would take "more work." He was speaking to reporters for the first time since taking over the Pentagon.

Panetta said during his confirmation hearings last month that Al Qaeda had been severely damaged, but he has not claimed before that it was nearing defeat. The CIA and the military's Joint Special Operations Command have kept lists of senior terrorist leaders for years, adding new names as individuals on the list were killed or captured. It was unclear whether Panetta was indicating that the U.S. now believes it is nearing the end of the known terror leaders.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,5988043.story


Note: July 9, 2011, 5:20 a.m.

[MH]

Defeat is a far stretched concept here.
Having them under control is more like it but it means that US has to keep doing whatever is doing for unknown period of time into the future.
If its just a spin for withdrawal from Afghanistan that different story

[Gerald]

Maybe .. but much of this fit together .. and this need not be farfetched, I would say that it is his vision .. and stuff like that is always needed.

[mookiemookie]

Its this idea that there's a finite number of terrorists and all we have to do is kill them all and we win that's so maddening. The whole "War on Terror" is lunacy. You can't fight a war on an idea...there's no way to kill an idea. It's a war without end. It was designed from the very start as a power grab..."oh well we need to do that because we're in a war, you see!"

[FIREWALL]

Terrorists are like MOLD. You never can kill all the Spores and it grows back.

[MH]

Originally Posted by mookiemookie

Its this idea that there's a finite number of terrorists and all we have to do is kill them all and we win that's so maddening. The whole "War on Terror" is lunacy. You can't fight a war on an idea...there's no way to kill an idea. It's a war without end. It was designed from the very start as a power grab..."oh well we need to do that because we're in a war, you see!"

Agree on the first part.
Disagree on the second:
War on terror is real and its purpose is to defend your country against terrorist attacks.
The effective strategy is another thing-intelligence,troops in Afghanistan or not....etc.

[Gerald]

It is right that these are like sponges, and grows and grows, but you have to look forward to, mine more and not let the weeds grow, because then the authorities have lost controls to, so steps can be done to reduce the spread.

[Feuer Frei!]

Of course it's too hard to put a time line on this.
Him delivering a speech in his new job, nothing surprising there.
A vision is needed to have a goal.
All i can say is: good luck. May the vision be realised and the world will be a safer place to live in.

[gimpy117]

within reach? somehow my thoughts drift back to a carrier deck with a banner in 2003.

[TLAM Strike]

Originally Posted by FIREWALL

Terrorists are like MOLD. You never can kill all the Spores and it grows back.

and it spreads with the wind too. Leaked documents show that Hamas is now operating in Arizona of all places.

[Onkel Neal]

Let's see... no war on terror, Al Queda... shrinks? Weakens? Gives up? No, that doesn't sound right.

The last 10 years of operations has killed and imprisoned a large segment of the first stringers. True, you cannot wipe it out completely but not fighting back is not much of an option.

[Gerald]

Authorities, and international organizations, has a wide cooperation on terror and other global threats, and the U.S. is part of the piece, including the CIA, NSA, and other operating units.

[Platapus]

Seems like this war on terrorism has always been "just another six months" type of war... and may always remain so.

[Dowly]

Originally Posted by Platapus

Seems like this war on terrorism has always been "just another six months" type of war... and may always remain so.

Indeed.

[Gerald]

If it is "only" six months ... so breathe sure many, but this is more so, around the clock, and basically anywhere on the Globe.