SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-13-10, 02:03 PM   #1
GoldenRivet
Subsim Aviator
 
GoldenRivet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,726
Downloads: 146
Uploads: 0


Default Virginia federal court rules Obamacare unconstitutional

Discuss
__________________
GoldenRivet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-10, 02:13 PM   #2
Freiwillige
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phx. Az
Posts: 1,458
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0
Default

Its not rocket science. The federal government has a job, this was not one of them.
Freiwillige is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-10, 02:33 PM   #3
FIREWALL
Eternal Patrol
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CATALINA IS. SO . CAL USA
Posts: 10,108
Downloads: 511
Uploads: 0
Default

This will be dumped onto the next Presidents plate.
__________________
RIP FIREWALL

I Play GWX. Silent Hunter Who ???
FIREWALL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-10, 02:34 PM   #4
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

It would seem that a Virginia Federal Court ruled 'Obamacare' unconstitutional.
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-10, 02:59 PM   #5
Bubblehead1980
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 7,099
Downloads: 605
Uploads: 44


Default

Great news.Perhaps one day we will get a real health care reform law in this country that respects citizen's rights.
Bubblehead1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-10, 04:55 PM   #6
Bilge_Rat
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: standing watch...
Posts: 3,855
Downloads: 344
Uploads: 0
Default

so far, you have had two federal judges who ruled it was constitutional and one federal judge who ruled it was unconstitutional, so this is headed to the Supreme Court one way or another. More importantly, Judge Hudson refused to block the rollout of the law.

There was an interesting article a few days ago on the head lawyer at Justice heading the Health care fight:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/10/he...d=1&ref=policy
__________________
Bilge_Rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-10, 04:58 PM   #7
GoldenRivet
Subsim Aviator
 
GoldenRivet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,726
Downloads: 146
Uploads: 0


Default

i dont think a lot of the law should be blocked.


just the mandate.



ditch the mandate dems, and it looks like we have a deal... but what we had from our government was an uncompromising bill, passed in the dead of night after a speed reading short course rocketed it through the legislative process.

regardless of the content of the bill... i dont see how ANY American could be comfortable with any of that.

keep in mind, there are still scores of outstanding lawsuits to be heard in numerous states... and it still has to go to the blow hards at the "supreme" court
__________________
GoldenRivet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-10, 06:28 PM   #8
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,360
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen View Post
It would seem that a Virginia Federal Court ruled 'Obamacare' unconstitutional.
Not really. Only one provision was judged to be unconstitutional.

It will go before the supreme court and will have a pretty good chance of being upheld (being unconstitutional).

This was an area that the Democrats went into when they shouldn't have.

We really don't want the precedent to be set that would allow the federal government to mandate the purchase of a commercial product/service.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-10, 07:33 PM   #9
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus View Post
Not really. Only one provision was judged to be unconstitutional.

It will go before the supreme court and will have a pretty good chance of being upheld (being unconstitutional).

This was an area that the Democrats went into when they shouldn't have.

We really don't want the precedent to be set that would allow the federal government to mandate the purchase of a commercial product/service.
Hey, I was given no link or information other than the title and an order to discuss, so I did my best with what I had available.
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-10, 07:46 PM   #10
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

Of course minus the mandate, there is nothing there except massive unintended consequences (which the bill was already full of).

The whole point of forcing people to buy is to increase the pool of payees that are unlikely to use care (young adults—a patient population that is very well served with nothing but inexpensive catastrophic care coverage for trauma).

No mandate, plus dumb things like no denial or even raised rates for preexisting conditions means bankruptcy for insurance. Insurance margins (health insurance, anyway, I think they do well on life insurance) are actually not high. Total insurance profit is 1-2% of total healthcare cost, and ~50% of the total is not "insured, so that makes insurance profit 2-4%. With no mandate, they don't have loads of healthy people forced to pay premiums, but they still have to insure very bad risks at the same rate as the healthy. That's like charging someone the exact same premium for a Smart Car as a Bugatti Veyron.

The mandate was always a really bad idea. It wasn't just dems in favor of mandates, BTW, even though they own this entire bill. Some R plans that never left committee also had mandates as I recall. It's terrible law, IMO. The government could by the same precedent require people to buy X pounds of veggies per week, for example. No difference at all.
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-10, 08:48 PM   #11
yubba
Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: in a neighborhood near you
Posts: 2,478
Downloads: 293
Uploads: 2
Default

All right, one for the good guys.
yubba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-10, 09:39 PM   #12
gimpy117
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 3,243
Downloads: 108
Uploads: 0
Default

Of course a court in VIRGINIA would rule it "unconstitutional" ironically it's basically the republicans bill with he whole mandate part
__________________
Member of the Subsim Zombie Army
gimpy117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-10, 09:42 PM   #13
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

It's a federal judge.

This bill has no "republican" parts at all, the dems own it, even if the reps had similar requirements in other bills. they had supermajority, it was 100% their choice what was in, and they took no input at all from the other side.

The government should GTF out of healthcare, frankly. yes, that means I think they should dump medicare and medicaid. The former is going to bankrupt the country unless dumped. Period.
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-10, 12:21 PM   #14
papa_smurf
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: High Peak, Derbyshire
Posts: 2,851
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
Default

Its so good to see American democracy in action
__________________

papa_smurf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-10, 01:29 PM   #15
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen View Post
Hey, I was given no link or information other than the title and an order to discuss, so I did my best with what I had available.
I noticed that, and thought you did quite well indeed.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.