SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-06-10, 03:07 AM   #1
Moeceefus
中国水兵
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 278
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default Made in China

China's carrier killers. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100805/...carrier_killer
Moeceefus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-10, 04:07 AM   #2
papa_smurf
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: High Peak, Derbyshire
Posts: 2,851
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
Default

Could be an end to the USA's carrier dominance. We can help tho, all they have to do is purchase some Type 45's from us
__________________

papa_smurf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-10, 06:13 AM   #3
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Eh, didn't long range anti-ship missiles with enough accuracy to hit single ships exist for decades already?
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-10, 07:56 AM   #4
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

The Kitchen ASM comes to mind, as well as our friends the Stallion, Sunburn, and Shipwreck. All of which could pose a concern to a carrier group, particularly if swarm launched.

Still, Jack Ryan will be along in a bit to give us the low down on what makes the Dong Feng so special.

EDIT:

Wait...wait a minute...

The Dong Feng is a ballistic missile?
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-10, 08:04 AM   #5
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
The Dong Feng is a ballistic missile?
Well, that explains a lot.

Though I don't think it's as much as an ultimate CVBG-killing weapon as they make it out to be. It is completely dependent on satellites for guidance, and it's bound to be less reliable than usual ASMs at least at this point. There are also ways to shoot down a ballistic missile from a ship nowadays, so a CVBG is not completely defenceless against it.
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-10, 08:37 AM   #6
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Indeed, the AEGIS system can hit a Ballistic missile IIRC, so the CVBG has that covered, unless of course they employ the same techniques as the Soviets would have with their ASMs (what do we call the Dong Feng anyway...an ASBM?) and swarm launch them. AEGIS could take out four or five but one or two would still get through and from the angle of approach they would screw the flight deck if they hit, thus putting the carrier out of useful action.

Not an all powerful weapon, but still an interesting approach to the problem of circumnavigating CVBG defences.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-10, 07:54 AM   #7
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,360
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
AEGIS could take out four or five but one or two would still get through and from the angle of approach they would screw the flight deck if they hit, thus putting the carrier out of useful action.

Not an all powerful weapon, but still an interesting approach to the problem of circumnavigating CVBG defences.
Even if the ASBM is equipped with the smallest warhead, 100Kt will do more than screw up a flight deck.

Remember, what 15 Kt did to Hiroshima.

This is something to be concerned with. But like any other weapon system, it can be mitigated... given time, money, and focus.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-10, 08:47 AM   #8
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

I see Oberon triggered the TLAM Signal again...

Yes the DF is a Ballistic missile.

Raptor1 is on the right track, it has limitations.

But it is still a little better than conventional air or ship launched missiles. For example its range is fantastic. There are only a few weapons that can engage it- all the fighters and "normal" SAMs in the CSG have no ABM capability. Physical decoys can be carried in large numbers perhaps dozens. Finally its launchers are well hidden and out of range of attack.

Its disadvantages include that it must be radar guided. Its screaming though the atmosphere so its going to get real hot precluding use of an IR seeker. I disagree with Raptor1 on that it needs a Satellite for guidance, a radar emitter could be included in each warhead. OTH targeting is a requirement- shoot that down (Plane or Sat) and these missiles are useless.

EDIT: Yes DF is an ASBM
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-10, 03:31 PM   #9
HundertzehnGustav
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lux, betw. G, B and F
Posts: 1,898
Downloads: 66
Uploads: 0
Default

Scheiiiissseeee!!!!!
Alaaaarrmmm!!!

wheres them new US lazer Gunz?
__________________
In conclusion: SH3 is the shizzle, yo. -Frau Kaleun
Another negative about using your deck gun is that you are definately DETECTED, which has long term effects on your relationship with aircraft. -snestorm
HundertzehnGustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.