![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
SUBSIM Newsman
|
Firms Contracting With U.S. Government Flout Iran Sanctions Law,
Watchdog Says.Two multinational corporations that have earned millions of dollars in U.S. government contracts are conducting business with Iran in violation of the recently signed sanctions law, according to an Iran watchdog group that has provided its research to FoxNews.com.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...est=latestnews
__________________
Nothing in life is to be feard,it is only to be understood. Marie Curie ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Storming the beaches!
Posts: 4,254
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
<applause>
![]() ![]() I have nothing but respect for Maersk and Komatsu, and I hope they find many a way around this idiotic sanction. For some reason, there are people who really believe that sanctions will somehow prevent an extremist rogue state from developing weapons or the wherewithal to use them. Y'know, because it's worked so many times before ![]() I've said it before and I'll say it again; Trading with a nation is one of the surest ways to make it completely non-threatening. Even a die-hard.... insane Islamic theocracy like Iran cannot stand for long against the quality of life that free trade brings. Free trade creates wealth. Wealth creates independence, education, secularism, generosity, etc. etc. In short, common people who have access to a good quality of life and an reasonable ability to advance themselves will not bother with idiotic extremist ideology, and they will not support a theocratic power structure. They'll become Islamic laxtremists. Rather than isolating and shunning Iran, thus giving her cause to hate us with more fervor, we should be undermining her ridiculous bass-ackwards values with knowledge and cool gizmos, and she will give us oil and other products in exchange. Before you know it, she'll resemble the Special Economic Zones of Communist China; ideological in name only, and dedicated to overthrowing state-imposed stupidity. She'll also be behind more developed nations in terms of economic power. Can you say "monopsony"? ![]() ![]() What we should really be looking at is who stands to gain from an anti-Iran agenda. I'll take a wild guess and suppose that it isn't domestic industries or politicians who need votes; y'know, those self-serving A-wipes we all know and love.
__________________
![]() I stole this sig from Task Force ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Have sanctions EVER worked? Has any sovereign nation ever changed solely due to sanctions? Even the commonly touted South Africa example is not exactly conclusive. The instances where sanctions have failed seem to be more numerous than instances where they have been successful. It used to be said that democracies don't declare war on each other. I like to think that capitalistic economies don't declare war on each other. One thing the United States needs to avoid is placing any country in a position where they have "nothing to lose".
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
Of COURSE they work! Just look at Cuba!
Wait, what....? ![]() Back when the original Gulf War took place I had a co-worker who espoused the opinion that, while he agreed that sooner or later we would have to attack Iraq to liberate Kuwait, he wished that we had given the sanctions more time. Rather than ask him to show any occasion where sanctions had ever worked, I asked him one question: "How long?" "How long what?" "It's easy to see if the sanctions worked. Not so easy to see if they're not working. So how long do you think we should wait until we do use force? Another year? Ten? Never?" He didn't really have an answer for that.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Between test depth and periscope depth
Posts: 3,021
Downloads: 175
Uploads: 16
|
![]()
Beat me to it!
![]() Any nation that uses nuclear weapons in battle will have it's penis smacked by the entire would faster then greased lightning.
__________________
USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G) Comms Div 2003-2006 Qualified 19 November 03 Yes I was really on a submarine. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
I agree. When ever a country like North Korea successfully tests a nuclear device (not saying that North Korea has yet), The President of the United States needs to meet with them (or communicate with them) the following
Welcome to the Nuclear Club. Now that you possess nuclear weapons, you are a potential threat to the United States and our allies. Mind you that I am not saying that you are a threat, only with due to your nuclear weapons, you are a potential threat. That being said, I am informing you that I have re-targeted sufficient numbers of our nuclear weapons to destroy your country completely. If you use a nuclear weapon in an offensive manner, we will destroy your entire country. Welcome to the Nuclear Club. With great weapons, comes great responsibilities.... and great consequences.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Storming the beaches!
Posts: 4,254
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Then we sit back and watch the fireworks.
__________________
![]() I stole this sig from Task Force ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|