SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-22-08, 06:05 PM   #1
greyrider
Watch Officer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 334
Downloads: 237
Uploads: 0
Default benteen, come quick!





many were european, irish, swiss, french.
look into the eyes of the great chief sitting bull, what do you see?
i could feel it threw a century.







__________________
Her gun crew had guts, however, for from her canting bow came a half dozen well-aimed rounds. How they pointed and trained their gun on that tilting platform will long remain a wonder, and their dedication in keeping up the fire until they went under would be a matter of pride to any nation.

O'Kane, Richard. Clear the Bridge!: The War Patrols of the U.S.S. Tang
greyrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-08, 06:27 PM   #2
LukeFF
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 3,610
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 5
Default

Huh? What is this thread doing here?
__________________


ROW Sound Effects Contributor
RFB Team Leader
LukeFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-08, 04:13 PM   #3
Rockin Robbins
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DeLand, FL
Posts: 8,900
Downloads: 135
Uploads: 52


Default

Very interesting. Is there a sub named after Gen Custer or something? It's just very strange that a man whose main contribution was winning the Battle of Gettysburg should be known for dying in the desert. Bet he'd be mad!
Rockin Robbins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-08, 08:00 PM   #4
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockin Robbins
Very interesting. Is there a sub named after Gen Custer or something? It's just very strange that a man whose main contribution was winning the Battle of Gettysburg should be known for dying in the desert. Bet he'd be mad!
Would you happily serve on something named after someone who got massacred? I wouldn't be too thrilled about it.
__________________

bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-08, 09:02 PM   #5
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

There was a Liberty Ship named for him.

But I agree: what's the point of the thread?
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-08, 09:19 PM   #6
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,197
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockin Robbins
Very interesting. Is there a sub named after Gen Custer or something? It's just very strange that a man whose main contribution was winning the Battle of Gettysburg should be known for dying in the desert. Bet he'd be mad!
Winning the battle of Gettysburg, Custer? I'd bet Chamberlain, Hancock, Buford and a few others would have at that.

__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-08, 08:56 AM   #7
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockin Robbins
Very interesting. Is there a sub named after Gen Custer or something? It's just very strange that a man whose main contribution was winning the Battle of Gettysburg should be known for dying in the desert. Bet he'd be mad!
Winning the battle of Gettysburg, Custer? I'd bet Chamberlain, Hancock, Buford and a few others would have at that.

I'm sure you're right, but J.E.B. Stuart would have agreed with RR. Yeah, he did it by throwing unit after unit into the fight, and losing over and over until he finally won, but Custer beat Stuart, and that made a huge difference in the final outcome.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-08, 10:55 AM   #8
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,197
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve
Quote:
Originally Posted by August
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockin Robbins
Very interesting. Is there a sub named after Gen Custer or something? It's just very strange that a man whose main contribution was winning the Battle of Gettysburg should be known for dying in the desert. Bet he'd be mad!
Winning the battle of Gettysburg, Custer? I'd bet Chamberlain, Hancock, Buford and a few others would have at that.

I'm sure you're right, but J.E.B. Stuart would have agreed with RR. Yeah, he did it by throwing unit after unit into the fight, and losing over and over until he finally won, but Custer beat Stuart, and that made a huge difference in the final outcome.
IIRC (meaning i should probably check my references before posting this) the Custer/Stuart engagement was a rear guard action fought to give the bulk of the rebel army time to escape to the south. I could be wrong but I thought the battle was pretty much lost for the Confederates on the 2nd day when they failed to turn the Union flank at Little Round Top and the final nail in their coffin on the third day after Pickets Charge.
__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-08, 06:14 PM   #9
darius359au
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

The Custer/Stuart fight was a sideshow , it happened after the battles was over and the Confederacy was retreating - Stuart had been raiding to the north for most of the fight and arrived at Lee's headquarters late in the evening on the second day.Custer spent the 3 days doing cavalry piquet at the rear as protection against Stuart (no-one knew where beauty was , he was supposed to be scouting for Lee to find the Union army , but as usual he went rampaging off around the countryside leaving Lee blind.).Stuart ended up covering the retreat during the night and day of the 3rd/4th of july.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-08, 06:28 AM   #10
nikimcbee
Fleet Admiral
 
nikimcbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Patroling the Slot.
Posts: 17,952
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darius359au
The Custer/Stuart fight was a sideshow , it happened after the battles was over and the Confederacy was retreating - Stuart had been raiding to the north for most of the fight and arrived at Lee's headquarters late in the evening on the second day.Custer spent the 3 days doing cavalry piquet at the rear as protection against Stuart (no-one knew where beauty was , he was supposed to be scouting for Lee to find the Union army , but as usual he went rampaging off around the countryside leaving Lee blind.).Stuart ended up covering the retreat during the night and day of the 3rd/4th of july.
Here's the real people that ass-whooped Custer: Stuart's horse artillery!
http://www.amazon.com/Galloping-Thun.../dp/0811707075




I don't remember where it was at, but Stuart's Horse arty came across Custer's command camp and chased them for 15 miles.
__________________
nikimcbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-08, 06:49 AM   #11
nikimcbee
Fleet Admiral
 
nikimcbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Patroling the Slot.
Posts: 17,952
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve
Quote:
Originally Posted by August
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockin Robbins
Very interesting. Is there a sub named after Gen Custer or something? It's just very strange that a man whose main contribution was winning the Battle of Gettysburg should be known for dying in the desert. Bet he'd be mad!
Winning the battle of Gettysburg, Custer? I'd bet Chamberlain, Hancock, Buford and a few others would have at that.

I'm sure you're right, but J.E.B. Stuart would have agreed with RR. Yeah, he did it by throwing unit after unit into the fight, and losing over and over until he finally won, but Custer beat Stuart, and that made a huge difference in the final outcome.
IIRC (meaning i should probably check my references before posting this) the Custer/Stuart engagement was a rear guard action fought to give the bulk of the rebel army time to escape to the south. I could be wrong but I thought the battle was pretty much lost for the Confederates on the 2nd day when they failed to turn the Union flank at Little Round Top and the final nail in their coffin on the third day after Pickets Charge.
I don't think after 3 days of heavy fighting, the Union Army was going to fight anybody.



After action report:
http://www.civilwarhome.com/custer.htm
__________________
nikimcbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.