SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-28-07, 08:53 AM   #1
Nerazzurri
Sonar Guy
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 392
Downloads: 47
Uploads: 0
Default GPU comparison

Could somebody please help me with a link for a site that can compare two gpu cards of the same model but of different interface? I need to compare PCI (not express) vs. AGP of one particular model.
__________________
GWX v3.0 Gold, Commander v3.2.
WINDOWS 10, G3258 @ 3.8Ghz, 8GB RAM, GTX 960 2Gb.
Nerazzurri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-07, 10:57 AM   #2
Konovalov
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: High Wycombe, Bucks, UK
Posts: 2,811
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
Default

The only site I can think of that can do direct comparison benchmarks for a large database of video cards is Tom's Hardware here: http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics_2007.html

Hope that helps in your AGP vs PIC Express questions.
__________________
"In a Christian context, sexuality is traditionally seen as a consequence of the Fall, but for Muslims, it is an anticipation of paradise. So I can say, I think, that I was validly converted to Islam by a teenage French Jewish nudist." Sheikh Abdul-Hakim Murad (Timothy Winter)
Konovalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-07, 11:01 AM   #3
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

There won't be much difference. ALl the BUS is for is moving the textures to the card, so you may have slightly increased loading times, but for gameplay, the textures will be on the card itself, so it won't be any slower.

I'll see if I can find something

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-07, 11:18 AM   #4
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Here is a couple 1600's (in blue). The memory is slightly faster on the AGP card, so it does a little better than the PCI-E version, but this should make it clear that the AGP BUS is having no effect on the performance of the board.



-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-07, 12:08 PM   #5
wamphyri
Lieutenant
 
wamphyri's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta
Posts: 260
Downloads: 40
Uploads: 0
Default

He said a NON express pci card .. those are much slower than AGP. Especially if we're talking 8x agp.
wamphyri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-07, 12:28 PM   #6
Nerazzurri
Sonar Guy
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 392
Downloads: 47
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wamphyri
He said a NON express pci card .. those are much slower than AGP. Especially if we're talking 8x agp.
Thank you LOL I'm no computer expert, so I was wondering if I had it totally wrong Yeah, just plain old PCI.
__________________
GWX v3.0 Gold, Commander v3.2.
WINDOWS 10, G3258 @ 3.8Ghz, 8GB RAM, GTX 960 2Gb.
Nerazzurri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-07, 12:48 PM   #7
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Still should be little difference except when something must be moved to the card. If you are moving 512 MB textures, yeah, it might be a bit slower. What PCI card by the way?

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-07, 02:01 PM   #8
Konovalov
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: High Wycombe, Bucks, UK
Posts: 2,811
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerazzurri
Quote:
Originally Posted by wamphyri
He said a NON express pci card .. those are much slower than AGP. Especially if we're talking 8x agp.
Thank you LOL I'm no computer expert, so I was wondering if I had it totally wrong Yeah, just plain old PCI.
Oops, sorry. I almost forgot that PCI still exists for graphics cards.
__________________
"In a Christian context, sexuality is traditionally seen as a consequence of the Fall, but for Muslims, it is an anticipation of paradise. So I can say, I think, that I was validly converted to Islam by a teenage French Jewish nudist." Sheikh Abdul-Hakim Murad (Timothy Winter)
Konovalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-07, 12:06 PM   #9
Nerazzurri
Sonar Guy
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 392
Downloads: 47
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
There won't be much difference. ALl the BUS is for is moving the textures to the card, so you may have slightly increased loading times, but for gameplay, the textures will be on the card itself, so it won't be any slower.

I'll see if I can find something

-S
Doesn't the AGP have better performance because it has dedicated bandwidth and reading textures directly from RAM, rather than copying it into the framebuffer?
__________________
GWX v3.0 Gold, Commander v3.2.
WINDOWS 10, G3258 @ 3.8Ghz, 8GB RAM, GTX 960 2Gb.
Nerazzurri is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.