![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: I think you should.... | |||
Keep the speed chart and lose the airbase markers |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 18.95% |
Keep the airbase markers and lose the speed chart |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
31 | 32.63% |
Keep both |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
23 | 24.21% |
Lose both |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
23 | 24.21% |
Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]()
I am thinking about:
1.) throwing out the airbases displaying on the map, for three reasons: a. Map in TM is laggy with all the extra names and such b. Kind of unrealistic knowing where all the jap airbases are. c. the reason for my use of it was to display some semblance of battle lines. Much like ports would change color in Sh3. I don't feel it accomplishes this enough in over ride A and B. 2.) Throwing out the gramaphone as a speed/range chart. This little feature generates nothing but complaints, and no compliments. I use it, but i swear, all i hear is complaints about "my gramaphone is broken" and frankly im tired of it. This poll closes in 5 days. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 194
Downloads: 65
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Keep the airbase markers. A map in which you do not know if its bases are enemy or friend would feel much too empty.
I would ditch the speed chart. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 908
Downloads: 673
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hiya,
Hmm well i know you mods put so much effort and your valuable time into these great creations so for me what you end up offering is fine by me But (aint there always a but lol) A: Is it possible to give choices of what individuals could have as there "default" tm map etc ? B: Would this overload your workload so to speak if at all it is possible ?? Ohh ps: Please if you ever think of losing the what i call "auto identifyer" (Lock on and after a few secs it shows target) could you please at least make this a seperate offering ![]() Anyways looking forward to 1.4 vs of TM I have clean installed and await the go ahead for my beloved mods (TM/ROW/Hud mod etc) Take Care Have Fun Ciao Def EDITED: Forgot to vote lol, Voted lose speedchart keep air base markers (solely due to me not yet getting to grips with the speedchart (also i scribble on papaer by me with rough course calcs lol) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
Hmm, just got an idea for a mod...
tater |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 908
Downloads: 673
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
C'mon Tater Sir, Don't keep me in suspenders err i mean suspense lol
Have Fun Ciao Def |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
It's easy enough (in theory) that I might bang out a test and show a screenshot later.
tater |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The details of my life are quite inconsequential
Posts: 1,049
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() I voted to keep the airbases. Because I like them. As for those who complain about what you've done ![]() Cheers!
__________________
If your target has a 30 degree AOB, the range from his base course line equals the current range divided by 2. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 908
Downloads: 673
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Woohoo, Sounds intriguing (spell check ? lol)
Will await screenie tater sir Have Fun Def ohh blast i was doing so well on my 2nd patrol too lol then arrives 1.4 to scuttle me grrrrrrrrrrr lol |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
Leo did the airbases, not me. Credit where credit is due!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]()
yeah, airbase markers are from Leo, it was one of his earlier mods before he got into ROW.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
My new idea works in proof of concept (just tested in game), just need to bang out the art.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,509
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I like the airbase markers as it is unrealistic due to it's 100% accuracy but i'd imagine knowledge of some enemy air base locations would have happened, ie: Wake Island.
I don't use the speed chart OR the gramophone so "NO COMMENT."
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]()
I must be the only person here who plots intercept courses on contact reports. :rotfl:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,509
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Once i'm in the area where I assume the contact was heading i'll dive and listen to sonar to find them. It doesn't always work but I don't normally have problems finding targets.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]()
I can't help but feel that if everyone knew how to use that chart, nobody would want to see it go. I just assume everyone knows how to use it (when in realty, most probably don't), its about as nifty as a nomograph. Regardless, im sick of the complaints.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|