HD DVD now is bigger than Blu-Ray - 51 GB

SUBMAN1 · 09-13-07, 09:55 AM

Blu-Ray can't compete with HD DVD as a spec. This is the final straw that should break Blu-Ray's back - blu-ray not only can't do all the disc features that can be done with an HD DVD player (An HD DVD player even hase a Pentium 4 inside and 1 GB of RAM!), it now is the smaller format of the two!

THis new HD DVD has tripple layers. It has 1 layer so that it is backwards compatible with normal DVD players so an HD DVD will work in a standard DVD player (Blu-Ray only works on a Blu-Ray players - nothing else), and then it has 2 layers like Blu-Ray for storage capacity - which tells me a standard HD DVD layer is slightly bigger than a Blu-Ray layer.

http://www.screendigest.com/online_s...60907-ec3/show

09-13-07, 09:55 AM	#1
SUBMAN1 Rear Admiral Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 11,866 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	HD DVD now is bigger than Blu-Ray - 51 GB Blu-Ray can't compete with HD DVD as a spec. This is the final straw that should break Blu-Ray's back - blu-ray not only can't do all the disc features that can be done with an HD DVD player (An HD DVD player even hase a Pentium 4 inside and 1 GB of RAM!), it now is the smaller format of the two! THis new HD DVD has tripple layers. It has 1 layer so that it is backwards compatible with normal DVD players so an HD DVD will work in a standard DVD player (Blu-Ray only works on a Blu-Ray players - nothing else), and then it has 2 layers like Blu-Ray for storage capacity - which tells me a standard HD DVD layer is slightly bigger than a Blu-Ray layer. http://www.screendigest.com/online_s...60907-ec3/show __________________