![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,243
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 8
|
Patrol Reports
So now that you've had a chance to use MoBo for awhile...
How do you like using it? :hmm: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Diego Calif
Posts: 2,290
Downloads: 187
Uploads: 12
|
![]() Quote:
SH3/4 Yes Yes No |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Medic
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Girona - Catalunya
Posts: 164
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
1) SH 3 2) changed and enhanced, superb tool 3) Yes 4) Yes
__________________
![]() Navigare necesse est, vivere non est necesse Navegar 'es necessari. Viure no |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Commander
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 462
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
1. SHIII (ocassionally SHIV)
2. Yes, most definitely. Going through the manual and working out examples from practice missions helped tremendously. 3. Depends really. For long range convoy interception I'll use mobo to work out an intercept course, but for lone targets I happen to stumble across it's usually much easier to work out the speed and AOB on the fly by using Hitman's whizwheel. TMA, on the other hand, is something I've been practicing a lot. I'm able to work out reasonably close estimates of the target's course (a course I already know from the mission builder) but speed is proving to be a bit more difficult. I can workout a few estimates based on slow/med/fast speeds but I still need to invest more time in doing the advanced stuff that you hinted on in the manual. 4. Yes. I use Mobo in place of this method when doing TMA. |
![]() |
|
|