SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-22-07, 12:00 PM   #1
Letum
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default Some kind of big Jumo-laser-plane-weapon

LINK

I really don't know what to say about this.
It just looks very impressive and it has something to do with lasers (which are inherently woo).

__________________
Letum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-07, 12:04 PM   #2
Rilder
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

My Eve online addict side of me tells me that its cap usage is to high and the plane will not be able to armor tank for long. (For those who dont play eve-online Lasers in EvE have very bad cap (energy) issues)

My normal side says cool.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-07, 12:07 PM   #3
Tchocky
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,874
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

Yeah, cool.

But wouldn't the area covered be very small, and given the speed of warheads, totally ineffectual except on a 1000+ fleet basis?
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Tchocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-07, 12:14 PM   #4
Letum
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky
Yeah, cool.

But wouldn't the area covered be very small, and given the speed of warheads, totally ineffectual except on a 1000+ fleet basis?
If it works how Im guessing it does, then it will only work if the laser is small enough, powerful enough and is very accurate at tracking.

They must have a small powerplant in that jumbo!
__________________
Letum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-07, 12:15 PM   #5
Tchocky
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,874
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

It'sw not so much the single unit I think would be ineffective, more the whole system, given the warning times on warheads.

Even thirty minutes is pushing it, and there would have to be a lot of these aircraft.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Tchocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-07, 12:25 PM   #6
Letum
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky
It'sw not so much the single unit I think would be ineffective, more the whole system, given the warning times on warheads.

Even thirty minutes is pushing it, and there would have to be a lot of these aircraft.
Ahh! I see! yes, you would need sevral in the air at once 24/7.
However I assume the range is only limited by the curve of the earth.
__________________
Letum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-07, 12:39 PM   #7
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Yeah - thats ABL. I've got some gear on that aircraft.

It works now too. The biggest problem in the past is that its chemical laser used to release such hot gases, it could melt off the verticle stabilizer. It is part of a multi teir system, that also includes THAAD, and specially modified SM Block 2's that have an extra booster to go after ballitic missiles. There is also an infrared launch detector that is part of this system, among other things.

Basically AMerica is creating a shield around itself.

There is some speculation that this system could theoretically target a man size object as well, but I guess we will never know.

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-07, 12:43 PM   #8
ASWnut101
Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky
Yeah, cool.

But wouldn't the area covered be very small, and given the speed of warheads, totally ineffectual except on a 1000+ fleet basis?

This is a weapon to engage ballistic missiles in their boost phase (that is, when the rocket is just leaving the pad and heading on it's way up out of the atmosphere. It does not engage the re-entry warheads, nor does it engage smaller missiles/rockets (like AIM-9 Sidewinders and such. It only is for the "big stuff")). The laser has an extremely long range (over 1,000 miles, I belive) and pinpoint accuracy (according to the reports).

They are to be deployed in one or two-plane groups around ICBM "hotspots" (Like around NK's Rocket-launch area on Korea's eastern coast. It is to be the "second layer of defence" for ICBMs).

The layers being:

Pre: Negotiation, talking.
1: Destroying the rocket while it is still on the ground; first-strike
2: The ABL system to destroy the rocket on it's way up.
3: (possibly still experimental/not fully developed) ABM Satillites in orbit./Ground based, midcourse interceptor rockets.
4: THAAD
5: Patriot Missiles/ABM Standard Missiles
6: Just about anything that can shoot a projectile (or otherwise) upwards in a last-ditch effort.:p
__________________


Last edited by ASWnut101; 06-22-07 at 09:45 PM.
ASWnut101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-07, 12:46 PM   #9
Tchocky
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,874
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

Forgot..

Step 7 - Negotiate! Shout at it!


Didn't know it was for boost phase, that changes things.
Sounds like ChromeDome missions again
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Tchocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-07, 01:22 PM   #10
tycho102
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,100
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

It's an interesting development but I have yet to see success rate.

Warning times on the +10000km rockets are 10 minutes or less. The smaller missiles that don't exit the stratosphere can be hit at any time before their trajectory peaks (or at least that's the way I understand it) because they don't use small MIRV's.
tycho102 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-07, 01:46 PM   #11
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Incase anyone cares, their will be multiple ABL's - I think 6 or 7 last time I checked on it. One will be parked off North Korea 24/7 - rotating shifts. The ABL is also in flight refuelable, and will probably be operated in shifts.

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-07, 02:28 PM   #12
LoBlo
Subsim Diehard
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas!
Posts: 971
Downloads: 78
Uploads: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Letum
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky
Yeah, cool.

But wouldn't the area covered be very small, and given the speed of warheads, totally ineffectual except on a 1000+ fleet basis?
If it works how Im guessing it does, then it will only work if the laser is small enough, powerful enough and is very accurate at tracking.

They must have a small powerplant in that jumbo!
Its a chemical laser, meaning that large vats of chemicals when mixed produce the light energy to power the laser. The range is reported in the hundreds of km so the area of coverage is fair. The big sphere on the front is actually the laser turret (output) that can rotate/swivel 200+ degrees up and down and side to side.

The US has been testing it successfully for years, but won't talk about much because nuclear missile defense is top secret. Japan, because of N.Korea's recent belligerant posturing has begun thinking about buying/developing their own.

cool stuff no doubt.
__________________
"Seek not to offend or annoy... only to speak the truth"-a wise man
LoBlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-07, 03:44 PM   #13
jumpy
Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 2,139
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Letum
It just looks very impressive and it has something to do with lasers (which are inherently woo).
nice phraseology. I may steal that for a signature at some point
__________________

when you’ve been so long in the desert, any water, no matter how brackish, looks like life


jumpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-07, 07:23 PM   #14
Bill Nichols
Master of Defense
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,502
Downloads: 125
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASWnut101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky
Yeah, cool.

But wouldn't the area covered be very small, and given the speed of warheads, totally ineffectual except on a 1000+ fleet basis?

This is a weapon to engage ballistic missiles in their boost phase (that is, when the rocket is just leaving the pad and heading on it's way up out of the atmosphere. It does not engage the re-entry warheads, nor does it engage smaller missiles/rockets (like AIM-9 Sidewinders and such. It only is for the "big stuff"). The laser has an extremely long range (over 1,000 miles, I belive) and pinpoint accuracy (according to the reports).

They are to be deployed in one or two-plane groups around ICBM "hotspots" (Like around NK's Rocket-launch area on Korea's eastern coast. It is to be the "second layer of defence" for ICBMs.

The layers being:

1. Destroying the rocket while it is still on the ground; first-strike
2. The ABL system to destroy the rocket on it's way up.
3. (possibly still experimental) ABM Satillites in orbit.
4. THADD
5. Patriot Missiles/ABM Standard Missiles
6. Just about anything that can shoot a projectile or otherwise upwards in a last-ditch effort.:p
Replace item 3 with long-range Midcourse interceptors. The U.S. already has a handful or two deployed in Alaska and California

http://www.mda.mil/mdalink/html/basics.html

__________________
My Dangerous Waters website:
Bill Nichols is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-07, 07:35 PM   #15
Letum
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

Ello Bill!
havn't seen you around much recently!
__________________
Letum is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.