SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-30-07, 10:03 AM   #1
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,602
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default Tanks for Afghanistan

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/...nada/index.php

http://www.sfu.ca/casr/bg-leopard2-netherlands.htm

http://www.focus.de/politik/ausland/...aid_57703.html

While German media so far do not say much about the 100 tanks Canada will buy from the Netherland (20 A6 and 80 A4 the Dutch have bought before from the Germans, other sources say it will be 40 + 60), it is clear now that Germany'S approach to Afghanistan will remain to be schizophrenic at best: it will loan the Canadians 20 Leopard-2A6, maybe currently the best protected tank with the greatest firepower in the world, and call it "alliance-solidarity". A long, loud and deep "hmmmmm" from me. Not about the Canadians, but about the Germans.

Although the delivery is free for Canada, and will be supported by training of the crews in Germany, and delivery of special equipment and items for maintenance, the German approach still is schiozophrenic, for the tanks will be given back at one day, but the treaty demands the Canadians to give them back unharmed and unchanged, in the state in wich they got delivered. That may proove to become a difficult task after their deployment in Afghanistan, to put it mildly.

The A6 incarnation, according to the little I know, is even more armoured than the STRV122, the A5-variant delivered to Sweden which was beefed up with even more armour protection. It offers superior crew protection and additional protection against mines and ATGMs, it also includes probably the most modern suite of sensors and SA-increasing information systems of any tank of the present, and has even further enhanced speed and mobility. It comes with a new tank-gun, too.

I hate it to see the Geman government to sneak around like this. They should make a clear decison and statement concenring the commitmeent in Afghanistan. I personally believe it is a folly to stay there even longer. Accepting risks is okay if there is something that makes up for compensation, but I do not see how the the war can be won anymore: too many moistakes have been made in the past 5 years, and now the situation is out of control. But not to say that, while thinking it, half-heartedly making lip-confessions and try to calm allies by doing little favours like sending (useless) Tornados (no digital life processing of DTV images, what gives Taleban hours of time to react to them), or lending tanks to the Canadians who have choosen to get involved in the dirty work, simply is mean and disgusting. It shows neither backbone, nor honour.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/...485289,00.html
http://www.spiegel.de/international/...485299,00.html
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.

Last edited by Skybird; 05-30-07 at 10:18 AM.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 10:18 AM   #2
AntEater
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 936
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Disgusting
I mean it is one thing to question the purpose of the Afghanistan mission (I do) but another thing, to leave your allies to do the dirty work for you.
But this whole charade continues against the germans as well, until today, there has been no casualty list of germans in Afghanistan.
I am ashamed of how my government handles military affairs.
__________________
AntEater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 10:33 AM   #3
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,602
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

There is a casualty list, and it reads "21". But that is not what it is about. I want Germany to make a clear stand either on this or on that side of the line. Instead, they zigzag around and try to please everybody, America, Canada, Britain, Afghanistan, Muhammedan givernments, and loose track of reality meanhwile. As I see it the troops are left in danger without a realistic mission perspective, and without the situation offering them a realistic chnace anymnore to accomplish the mission they had been sent for. the Pashtuns are more allied with the Taleban than they ever were before 2001, and major parts of the population in general have been seriously alienated by the many losses they suffered from mthe hands of coalition troops, and the low speed of progress made. Over 80% of their young men have no chance to find work and make a living for themselves, not to mention their families. This is too much as if the reconstruction aid can compensate for that ammount of alienation anymore. Afghnaistan literally has become a victim of the Iraq war 2003. All the effort that was put into Iraq by amrica -should have been focussed on Afghanistan exclusively. If that would have been done and the akistani would have been getting rid of, I am sure that the situation would look much, much brigther now. But as it is now, it is a victory that was follishly turned into a major defeat, at the cost of two countries being brought to total ruins.

Of all stupid defense minsters in Germany of the past 20 years, our current one, Jung, is by far the most idiotic and unrealistic one anyway. Redet der einen Schwachsinn, wenn man ihm ein Mikrophon hinhält!
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 01:06 PM   #4
Heibges
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

At least folks want to buy the German tanks.

The turbine engine in the M1 scares many potential buyers away, due to increased mainentance requirements. I heard they were going to replace the turbine on hte M1 with an English-made V-12 in hopes of increasing exports (and keeping the factories open).
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface.

http://www.hackworth.com/
Heibges is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 02:20 PM   #5
The Avon Lady
Über Mom
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 6,147
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

And not a word from Skybird about the Leopard tank's carbon footpint.

Pffffff

:p
__________________


"Victory will come to us from the wombs of our women."
- Houari Boumedienne, President of Algeria, Speech before the UN, 1974
The Avon Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 03:02 PM   #6
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Don't you mean Carbon Tread AL?
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.