On the bad taste scale OJ Simpson rates a perfect 10

[Konovalov]

I viewed this article from my local paper back home: http://www.smh.com.au/news/people/oj...266678010.html

In a deal that some media executives called revolting, OJ Simpson plans a book and TV interview to discuss how, hypothetically, he could have killed his ex-wife and her friend - a story his publisher considers "his confession".

And:

One expert noted that the justice system's protection against so-called double jeopardy means Simpson's book, explosive as it may be, should not expose him to any new legal danger.

"He can write pretty much whatever he wants," said Laurie Levenson, a Loyola University law school professor and former federal prosecutor who has followed the case closely. "Unless he's confessing to killing somebody else, he can probably do this with impunity."

Really sickening not to mention sad for the victims families.

What on earth does Mr Simpson have in store next?

[The Avon Lady]

Originally Posted by Konovalov

What on earth does Mr Simpson have in store next?

Politics would seem about right. :p

[TteFAboB]

We should boycott him, his book, whoever prints his book (if possible, if there is an alternative), his TV Interview, whoever advertises during his interview if that money is going to him (again if replaceable) untill these entities apologize, withdraw, express regret, etc.

To me this is a confession indeed, but that means he must pay for his crime. He can't write pretty much whatever he wants. I could write this because I didn't killed anybody. OJ can't. He actually did commit murder.

[Konovalov]

Originally Posted by TteFAboB

We should boycott him, his book, whoever prints his book (if possible, if there is an alternative), his TV Interview, whoever advertises during his interview if that money is going to him (again if replaceable) untill these entities apologize, withdraw, express regret, etc.

Ultimately you are talking about News Corp. because the book is being published by Harper Collins and the TV program is to be aired on Fox television, with an interview by celebrity publisher Judith Regan. Let the boycott begin.

[STEED]

I have no interest what so ever.

[kiwi_2005]

Must be the worse feeling ever knowing the person who has killed your loved one is walking free. And now hes putting out a book.

[Onkel Neal]

Originally Posted by TteFAboB

We should boycott him, his book, whoever prints his book (if possible, if there is an alternative), his TV Interview, whoever advertises during his interview if that money is going to him (again if replaceable) untill these entities apologize, withdraw, express regret, etc.

To me this is a confession indeed, but that means he must pay for his crime. He can't write pretty much whatever he wants. I could write this because I didn't killed anybody. OJ can't. He actually did commit murder.

He was aquitted, which means he can never be tried for this crime again (double jeapordy). He could write a book and declare he did it, wouldn't make any difference now.

He was aquitted, which means he can never be tried for this crime again (double jeapordy). He could write a book and declare he did it, wouldn't make any difference now.

Correct, but the Feds have a great civil rights case to bring against OJ if he ever admitted to the crime. Murder is the ultimate denial of a persons civil rights.

[fredbass]

Well I just hope he has nightmares every night. And maybe we'll get lucky and somebody will send him to Hell very soon.

[joea]

I confess, I, hypothetically speaking, did NOT pretend not to shoot JR. I deny having shot him and if I did, hypothetically speaking, it was just a dream.



Where's my multi-million dollar contracts, interviews and movie deals.



Anyone?

[tycho102]

JR deserved to get shot. That series needed kill'n.

As for OJ, he is an "acquitted murderer". I think putting him up there on Fox is repulsive, unless it causes the bastard more trouble, in which case it will have been a good call.

[ksmith213]

Why do you folks keep saying OJ is a murderer?
He was found not guilty. What was the motive? Jealously?
Wasn't he and the wife divorced for over 9 years? Why would he do this
when his kids were so close by? Only an idiot would believe that.

I think America is mad because OJ was a Black man with major money and caught
the system trying to frame him. He had the money to catch their lying behinds.

Black America cheered....and White America cried. For that OJ must pay the price of social outcast. That's why I think OJ does this. Just to pissed you sore loser off. If you only would have accepted the verdict and move on. But....no....

Ron Goldman and Nicole were druggies. Goldman had shaky associates.....I think somebody killed for money.

America really needs to get over the OJ lost. You can't frame and plant evidence on everybody. EDTA doesn't lie...blood compressions can't be hidden....a little glove can't become a big glove. It didn't fit....get over the schtt!!!

[August]

Until i read Ksmiths post i had yet to meet anyone, black or white, who believed OJ was really innocent.

[tycho102]

Originally Posted by ksmith213

Why do you folks keep saying OJ is a murderer?

He was acquitted in the federal trial, convicted in the civil trial. There is a $30 million dollar bounty/decision on him from the civil trial, of which almost nothing has been paid because there are so many loopholes in the law and OJ was transferring assests while riding in the "white bronco".

Thus,


Acquitted. Murderer.

[Torplexed]

OJ is a narcissist. I think he really does want to flaunt the fact that he got away with two murders.

I guess there's nothing to do but wait for Michael Jackson to hawk his book: "If I did touch them here's how I did it!"