![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 6
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hi Guys
![]() My starting procedure on a new mission is first to scan the SA/TA BB (US subs) to get a rough overview of the tactical situation. Then I go the NB TA display to get a more detailed picture of the surrounding traffic and to begin the initial classification using the NB signature. At this point I do not assign trackers in the NB station; instead I’m going back to the BB sonar where I’m assigning trackers to targets with a sufficient SNR on the memorized bearings (for DEMON use). Targets with low SNR are marked in the NB station. My questions are now: Is there a difference in bearing accuracy (or others things as well) when the tracker is assigning to a contact line in the BB display compared to assigning a tracker to a specific frequency line in the NB display. Furthermore: Does it matter which frequency line I’m assigning the tracker to in the NB display? Due to bearing scatter or variation in signal strength. I'm playing with patch v1.03 and LWAMI 3.02 Thanks Troels |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
The best way to be certain if a target is near or far is the bearing rate. If you have a weak signal but a high bearing rate, then it's probably a very quiet target that is very close to you. If it's a weak signal and a low bearing rate, then it's probably sufficiently far away that it'd be difficult to get an accurate range, and isn't of concern anyhow. In that case you just have to keep an eye on it, because over time it might draw closer and the bearing rate will increase accordingly. The one time I worry about low bearing rate targets is if I turn and the bearing rate blows up. If that's the case then the target was on a collision course. I've had that happen a couple times against quiet targets like SSBNs. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 6
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Thanks for your reply SeaQueen
![]() Then I don’t have to consider which sonar (NB or BB) I’m assigning the tracker in. Troels |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central MO
Posts: 1,562
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 6
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Sincerely Troels |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|