![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
1990's graphics might just be blocky enough for this !
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...y-5-years-late
__________________
"Realistic" is not always GAME-GOOD." - Wave Skipper ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Germany, Italy
Posts: 1,703
Downloads: 107
Uploads: 4
|
![]()
Haha, the return of Vector Grafics...AOD does much better already
![]() First I thought it was a sub over water, but no, a destroyer, look, look... Surely as effective as ugly, but: What did some old sub commanders say: There are no ships, only subs and targets... This is really a I-want-to-shot-down-that-thing ship, just for the sake of my eyes ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
"Realistic" is not always GAME-GOOD." - Wave Skipper ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Admiral
![]() |
![]()
Reading the article sounds like someone jumped the gun on this project. 23 to only 3 vessels? The ship will be delivered with guns in an inactive state?
It’s the DeLorean of ships! Will probably be horrible! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
It's a Pentagon contract; being fubared is sop. Or as the contractors say, "Love those govt. contracts !" as they laugh all the way to the bank.
__________________
"Realistic" is not always GAME-GOOD." - Wave Skipper ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|