SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Modern-Era Subsims > Dangerous Waters > DW Mod Workshop
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-13-06, 05:13 PM   #1
Mocbo
Watch
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 23
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default How Noisy is a Thypoon Class Sub

In the Lwami Mod the Thypoon has the SL of 68.
Other Subs like the LA or the Akula a much qieter.
The LA has 62 than the Imp LA has 58. Then the Seawolf has 55
The entire Akulas and a large Part of the other russian Subs are quiter.
Then the Foxtrot , an OLD DIESEL SUB has 69 !!
The Typoon is not noisy as a Diesel Sub!!

Whats going on?
What is Real. Is the Typoon really so noisy and not the qiet, very difficult do detect ,surprising nuclear Boomer Beast of the Ocean??

Greetings

moc
Mocbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-06, 05:37 PM   #2
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

The flownoise on something that big makes it noisy. Also twin screw boats are always noisyer than compairable ones with a single screw, plus factor in she has twin reactors.

BTW even old Diesels are still quiet boats, the old GUPPYs back in the late 70's just before they were retired could fool a top of the line ASW Frigate or MPA on a good day.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-06, 06:08 PM   #3
Mocbo
Watch
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 23
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

That a large 2 Screw Sub is noisier than a Single Screw Sub is logical. The Oscar has the Same Problem i think.... because is nearly the same kind of Construction.

What is then Real on The Mysterie that the Boat is hard to detectable?

Nothing?

Why have all West SSN Skippers Respect from that Behemoth?

Greetings

Moc
Mocbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-06, 06:59 PM   #4
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

Lets put it this way, a Typhoon is as noisy as a Delta IV interms of plant noise, but flow noise is high.

Fraid I can't reveal my source but they are reliable.
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-06, 07:43 PM   #5
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XabbaRus
Lets put it this way, a Typhoon is as noisy as a Delta IV interms of plant noise, but flow noise is high.

Fraid I can't reveal my source but they are reliable.
Would that source be 'Common Sense'? Typhoons are two Delta's slapped together so logically they would have the same plant noise but with twice the flow noise.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-06, 08:16 PM   #6
Hobnail
Bosun
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 67
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
Default

I mean....look at the size of it's straight edged fin! That's going to cause some major flow noise especially when maneuvering.
__________________
My TMA is like a drunk game of \"Pin the Tail on the Donkey\"

Be kind.
Hobnail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-06, 09:47 PM   #7
Deathblow
Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 518
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

You might find this interesting. Good tables, if you believe their estimates as legit. IIRC the Typhoon is the project 941.

http://www.fas.org/spp/eprint/snf03222.htm
http://www.fas.org/spp/eprint/snf03221.htm
Deathblow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-06, 08:29 AM   #8
Mocbo
Watch
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 23
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Very Interesting.

Thanks for the Addition

Greetings

Moc
Mocbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-06, 09:07 AM   #9
Deathblow
Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 518
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

What I found interesting is the stark difference between the detection ranges of open ocean versus the detection ranges of shallow water. They estimate that in open ocean the Typhoon could be detected at 70nm where as in shallow water those ranges would be about 10nm.

I can imagine their estimates for a quiet diesel in shallow water would be... :hmm:

I think the tricky thing in modeling the sound levels in DW is that we can't model the flow noise seperate from the narrowband noise. We can only model the noise level linearly with speed, not stepwise.
Deathblow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-06, 04:20 PM   #10
LuftWolf
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Free New York
Posts: 3,167
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
Default

The Ocean ranges would probably be taking into account the most favorable accoustic conditions of the submarine being detected in a second or possibly even third convergence zone.
__________________
LW
LuftWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-06, 10:20 AM   #11
Kapitan
Sub Test Pilot
 
Kapitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK + Canada
Posts: 7,112
Downloads: 69
Uploads: 7


Default

typhoon is quite noisey noiser than most the hull form is not that hydrodynamic so makes a fair noise also the screws give it away too.

typhoon is over 20 years old the oldest TK208 approaching 30 russia is replacing all submarines with the newer borey class which according to america analysts could be as quiet as the ohio's

typhoon is noisey hence why it does not go out mid atlantic instead under ice where it can mask some of its noise, but still it was a good invention at the time even if it was deemed failure by russians .

24 were to be built to counter americas 24 ohios (cut to 18 after a bit and cut again now)
but only 6 made it to sea and one was broken up due to the collapse of the soviet union.

also the kirov was to be built in numbers 12 were to be built only 4 made it to sea and the fitfh becomeing extended and turned into admiral kuznetsov, one remains active 3 reserve pending
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond



Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/

Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/

Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/
Kapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-06, 10:36 AM   #12
Kazuaki Shimazaki II
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,140
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LuftWolf
The Ocean ranges would probably be taking into account the most favorable accoustic conditions of the submarine being detected in a second or possibly even third convergence zone.
Yeah, just look at the 1000km detects - major ducting.

On the topic, IIRC, the current Database has it set up that the Typhoon is considered a "modern SSBN (+15)" while the Akula is +21.

Would it be more realistic to set things up so the Typhoon has a lower starting point than it does now (say 63-65, making it roughly comparable to a Akula I) but a higher rampup (say +25 or even +30?)

After all, if the main noise source on the Typhoon is flow, then it'd become a huge problem only at higher speeds. At low speeds, the flow noise problem will be mostly cut and you may even be able to get rid of the noise of an extra reactor by shutting it down - it won't be the first Russkie that tried to reduce noise by cutting a reactor and its screw.
Kazuaki Shimazaki II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-06, 10:43 AM   #13
Kapitan
Sub Test Pilot
 
Kapitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK + Canada
Posts: 7,112
Downloads: 69
Uploads: 7


Default

typhoon was built in 1979 the akula attacks 1984 big diffrence 5 years
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond



Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/

Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/

Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/
Kapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-06, 10:56 AM   #14
Kazuaki Shimazaki II
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,140
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapitain
typhoon was built in 1979 the akula attacks 1984 big diffrence 5 years
In that case 68 is not a bad noise level - it is equivalent to the contemporary Victor III.
Kazuaki Shimazaki II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-06, 02:36 PM   #15
LuftWolf
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Free New York
Posts: 3,167
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
Default

They are really of a different generation.

Also, the thrusts for SSBN's take into account the fact that they only go about 25kts max speed, so naturally the speed increase will be a bit less for them over subs that go over 30kts.

I believe according to the data that Amizaur has the flow noise REALLY gets going above 25kts, if I remember correctly. :hmm:
__________________
LW
LuftWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.