SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-14-06, 10:33 AM   #1
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default Gaming Network Card

I like all the cool stuff in my system, but I think this one is a little overkill.

-S

http://www.killernic.com/KillerNic/
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-06, 10:48 AM   #2
TteFAboB
Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,247
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

What the hell?!



L, O, L, comma-slash, close parenthesis.

Now I know why Server-sized computer cases became so popular. It's not because of style or small penial size. It's a bare necessity for the future. Double-sized video-cards, dual CPUs, physics cards, space required for that real cricket-based Pac-Man game, and now network cards, not to mention the biological human-brain unit required for advanced AI, I mean, plain I, without the A.

Does this thing really decrease Ping times?

Or people out there are simply trying to fill all your mother-board slots for the sake of filling your mother-board slots?
__________________
"Tout ce qui est exagéré est insignifiant." ("All that is exaggerated is insignificant.") - Talleyrand
TteFAboB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-06, 10:51 AM   #3
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TteFAboB
What the hell?!



L, O, L, comma-slash, close parenthesis.

Now I know why Server-sized computer cases became so popular. It's not because of style or small penial size. It's a bare necessity for the future. Double-sized video-cards, dual CPUs, physics cards, space required for that real cricket-based Pac-Man game, and now network cards, not to mention the biological human-brain unit required for advanced AI, I mean, plain I, without the A.

Does this thing really decrease Ping times?

Or people out there are simply trying to fill all your mother-board slots for the sake of filling your mother-board slots?
Net cards used to take a high CPU load, but I think this has gone too far, especially since CPU speeds are so high. This card to me is just snakeoil until I see that it really does some verifyable reduced ping times.

It does offload your CPU (in my case, a dual CPU so I am probably less affected by it), but I doubt it does anyting really useful.

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-06, 11:01 AM   #4
scandium
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,098
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Quote:
Originally Posted by TteFAboB
What the hell?!



L, O, L, comma-slash, close parenthesis.

Now I know why Server-sized computer cases became so popular. It's not because of style or small penial size. It's a bare necessity for the future. Double-sized video-cards, dual CPUs, physics cards, space required for that real cricket-based Pac-Man game, and now network cards, not to mention the biological human-brain unit required for advanced AI, I mean, plain I, without the A.

Does this thing really decrease Ping times?

Or people out there are simply trying to fill all your mother-board slots for the sake of filling your mother-board slots?
Net cards used to take a high CPU load, but I think this has gone too far, especially since CPU speeds are so high. This card to me is just snakeoil until I see that it really does some verifyable reduced ping times.

It does offload your CPU (in my case, a dual CPU so I am probably less affected by it), but I doubt it does anyting really useful.

-S
Yep, my sentiments as well. Little more than a prettied up Gigabit NIC with its own onboard processor, but on a gaming rig this doesn't mean squat; its tailored made for the crowd with more cash to waste than common sense (ie: a useless gimmick to pretty up the case internals, and useless because any decent board out now already has decent Gigabit lan onboard).
__________________
What can you do against the lunatic who is more intelligent than yourself, who gives your arguments a fair hearing and then simply persists in his lunacy? -- George Orwell
scandium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-06, 11:31 AM   #5
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scandium
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Quote:
Originally Posted by TteFAboB
What the hell?!



L, O, L, comma-slash, close parenthesis.

Now I know why Server-sized computer cases became so popular. It's not because of style or small penial size. It's a bare necessity for the future. Double-sized video-cards, dual CPUs, physics cards, space required for that real cricket-based Pac-Man game, and now network cards, not to mention the biological human-brain unit required for advanced AI, I mean, plain I, without the A.

Does this thing really decrease Ping times?

Or people out there are simply trying to fill all your mother-board slots for the sake of filling your mother-board slots?
Net cards used to take a high CPU load, but I think this has gone too far, especially since CPU speeds are so high. This card to me is just snakeoil until I see that it really does some verifyable reduced ping times.

It does offload your CPU (in my case, a dual CPU so I am probably less affected by it), but I doubt it does anyting really useful.

-S
Yep, my sentiments as well. Little more than a prettied up Gigabit NIC with its own onboard processor, but on a gaming rig this doesn't mean squat; its tailored made for the crowd with more cash to waste than common sense (ie: a useless gimmick to pretty up the case internals, and useless because any decent board out now already has decent Gigabit lan onboard).
Exactly. I decided to hold off on the Physics card too. Almost bought Aegia version, but said - what the hell am I actually buying? The Ghost Recon demo didn't impress me either. I guess the only real use for it is 3DMark 2006 (Which will use a physics card). No thanks!

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-06, 06:46 PM   #6
Wim Libaers
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Flanders
Posts: 569
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

Also keep in mind that computer games usually do not require much data transfer. Even 10Mbps cards are much more than games need. Such things may be useful for cluster supercomputers, but they already have specific cards available working on other (and better for the purpose) network types than Ethernet.
Wim Libaers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-06, 06:49 PM   #7
JSLTIGER
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Parkland, FL, USA
Posts: 1,437
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

To me this is overkill, and quite simply a little silly. No ISP has d/l rates of over 6-7MBps let alone 10, most onboard Ethernet solutions are rated at 100 or 1000 MBps anyway.
__________________
Thor:
Intel Core i7 4770K|ASUS Z87Pro|32GB DDR3 RAM|11GB EVGA GeForce RTX 2080Ti Black|256GB Crucial M4 SSD+2TB WD HDD|4X LG BD-RE|32" Acer Predator Z321QU 165Hz G-Sync (2540x1440)|Logitech Z-323 2.1 Sound|Win 10 Pro

Explorer (MSI GL63 8RE-629 Laptop):
Intel Core i7 8750H|16GB DDR4 RAM|6GB GeForce GTX 1060|128GB SSD+1TB HDD|15.6" Widescreen (1920x1080)|Logitech R-20 2.1 Sound|Win 10 Home
JSLTIGER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-06, 10:27 PM   #8
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSLTIGER
To me this is overkill, and quite simply a little silly. No ISP has d/l rates of over 6-7MBps let alone 10, most onboard Ethernet solutions are rated at 100 or 1000 MBps anyway.
It is not about transfer, its about CPU. Ehternet cards can eat up to 60% to 80% (More like half that or probably even less with current CPU's) during hi activity / transfer rates. The point of the board is to offload your CPU just like your soundcard (or should I say - some sound cards! ) does or your video card. An example in the past, extremely high speed NW'ing, 0% CPU overhead cards used what was once termed reflective memory (I used to be involved with these about 6 years ago when the company was just VMIC, but it looks like VMIC has been bought be GE FANUC - http://www.gefanuc.com/en/ProductSer...mivme5565.html), but this is more for real time apps (factory control, etc) in which communication has to happen now and CPU overhead is not an option (6 years ago, paying $10K for this board at half its speed was an easy thing to do, and you need at least 2 of them to make it work and they are probably still very pricey), but putting just a simple ethernet board in our system that offloads the CPU for low speed UDP packets in network gaming leaves me skepticle that you will gain a whole 2 ms, let alone something useful like 40 ms.

I'll quit ranting now, but the board is almost 100% in my mind waste. Yes, your CPU will have less to do, but it should be noted that it will be very little less to do. It's for the guy that spent $5K on his system and wants to show his friend some exotic product that no one needs.

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-06, 11:36 PM   #9
kiwi_2005
Eternal Patrol
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Aeoteroa
Posts: 7,382
Downloads: 223
Uploads: 1
Default

First grunty looking network card ive come across


I want one too.
__________________
RIP kiwi_2005



Those who can't laugh at themselves leave the job to others.



kiwi_2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-06, 08:12 AM   #10
Wim Libaers
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Flanders
Posts: 569
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSLTIGER
To me this is overkill, and quite simply a little silly. No ISP has d/l rates of over 6-7MBps let alone 10, most onboard Ethernet solutions are rated at 100 or 1000 MBps anyway.
It is not about transfer, its about CPU. Ehternet cards can eat up to 60% to 80% (More like half that or probably even less with current CPU's) during hi activity / transfer rates. The point of the board is to offload your CPU just like your soundcard (or should I say - some sound cards! ) does or your video card.

So, do you know any multiplayer computer game that causes high network activity (unless you're hosting a server for a lot of players)?
Wim Libaers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-06, 10:05 PM   #11
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wim Libaers
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSLTIGER
To me this is overkill, and quite simply a little silly. No ISP has d/l rates of over 6-7MBps let alone 10, most onboard Ethernet solutions are rated at 100 or 1000 MBps anyway.
It is not about transfer, its about CPU. Ehternet cards can eat up to 60% to 80% (More like half that or probably even less with current CPU's) during hi activity / transfer rates. The point of the board is to offload your CPU just like your soundcard (or should I say - some sound cards! ) does or your video card.

So, do you know any multiplayer computer game that causes high network activity (unless you're hosting a server for a lot of players)?
Answer - no. And, you won't find one. Online NW play is designed around the 28.8 (56K) modem and is optimized for that, so that all can play. This is just a tiny fraction of a 10 mbit board, let alone the standard 100 mbit board. I have a gigabit setup in my house. Starting to see the picture yet? It's a useless product.

-S

PS. upload speed happens to be your best friend in online play, and I still only have 768K up. No where near 1 gigabit.
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.