![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Born to Run Silent
|
![]()
Over the weekend, and through this week, a flood of players notified me personally by e-mail, PM, and phone concerning suspicions about the content and intellectual ownership of the “X1 Seewolfe Expansion”. Prior to this point, I understood this project to be an original work in the model of Pacific Aces, SCX, or Projekt Messerwetzer; that is, a group of modders and artists creating a make-over/enhancement for a popular game. I heartily support such efforts as long as they do not negatively affect future work by the parent company (Ubisoft) to continue further work on the host game, and as long as the work is legitimate.
I do know that Steffen Trombke of X1 contacted the Silent Hunter III dev team several times during SH3 development in order to develop an add-on. It was refused. Later he contacted Ubisoft again, proposing an add-on in the Pacific. The add-on was sent to the dev team for an evaluation and was rejected firmly. For poor quality but mainly for the redundant material they proposed, covered already by free mods or patches. I cannot say how much original content the “Seewolfe” expansion will have until it is released. According to their website, the main thrust appears to be more ports. Everything else in their feature list is an existing mod or an existing feature of the game.
It’s a simple matter for one to put on an innocent face and declare he had no intention of stealing modders’ work, when in reality he had the intention and was well on the way to getting away with whatever he could, thinking either no one would notice or getting credit on a readme was sufficient to take it. Now it appears X1 is contacting each modder with a “heartfelt” apology and requesting “to use the mod in return for a free copy of the add-on”. A case of asking forgiveness instead of seeking permission. Fortunately, the majority of the community has the good sense and fair play to call it what it is. Deceptive, dishonest, and a scam. From my conversations with the modders, “Reg McNeal” was very actively soliciting permission and on occasion, suggesting that he had “made some changes to the mod so now it was his own work.“ He also said he wanted to use the full version of some mods when the owner said he could use their lite version. We also witnessed a rather bizarre display by OSSI in the forum. I PMed OSSI to let him know that links to topless women are not allowed on this forum and ask him his connection to Steffen and X1. Quote:
He replied: Quote:
The internet publishing and mod world depends on the honor system. When a dispute arises and the honor system breaks down—or is intentionally breeched—the situation degenerates and can cast a pall over future community work and goodwill. My biggest concern is the precedent this could set and the impact on the fantastic mod work that has grown up around Silent Hunter III. Between the absurd forum behavior and lies, filching mods and asking afterwards, and narrow-minded view of what constitutes a add-on, I cannot help but condemn the entire venture. It looks like a scam, it smells like a scam, and the track record and actions of the author lead me to believe it is a scam. I’ll send a letter of protest to Matrix Games and suggest that their reputation is worth more than a embezzled add-on. Sure, they may sell copies in Wal-Mart, where unsuspecting customers will be won over by a fancy box. But what are they buying? Someone else's work. Neal Stevens Subsim Review ___________ |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Engineer
![]() Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Motor City
Posts: 209
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
As always, well said Neal.
![]()
__________________
". . . sailors do not fancy living underwater without breathing in sunshine occasionally." Commodore Joseph Smith commenting on the USS Monitor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Admiral
![]() |
![]()
Good man.
This will hopefully restore peace in the mod galaxy. As allway I have nothing but respect for original modders.
__________________
![]() "I like subcommanders...they dont have time for bull****!" Proud member of the Subsim army of zombies Becks website |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Watch
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 29
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Such drama! This is better then a soap opera...can't wait to see what's next!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Navy Dude
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 177
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Yeah, good job Neal for digging into this. Maybe things'll calm down a little bit. What I found most interesting about all of this is that first SH3 devs and then Ubisoft give a firm thumbs-down for the whole project :P Makes you wonder about the quality of Seawolves, , especially since Matrix has been releasing add-ons for Il-2, another Ubi title. Then again, now they claim they've got the rights to publish it after all :hmm: Confusing. Hope they sink like a ton of whalesh... err, bricks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Dipped Squirrel Operative
|
![]()
Hello,
a balanced statement based on facts, well done Neal. It seems as if those three persons are in fact one. This "X1" company already sold add-ons for other games, however those included mostly campaigns added to existing ones. What else is strange is the connection to the people at "Combatplanes" who at least made the pacific mod themselves, even if sales were stopped. I would really support and buy a genuine SH3 add-on, but apart from being not their/his own work they/he made themselves/himself a complete fool with the posts here at Subsim.com, and over at the SH3 forum. If he has a problem with people of jewish belief playing a german simulator ... this was probably the most idiotic statement i ever heard. Greetings, Catfish |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
ber Mom
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 6,147
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Ossi said "The problem is that some download a old test version of seawolves. with old readmes e.t.c."
Just for the record, the SW archive contents were dated July 19, 2005. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
Neal: Very good statement! Thank you very much!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Dipped Squirrel Operative
|
![]()
Hello Terrapin,
you know what happens to people that misspell HIS name ![]() In the b.noididntsayit ![]() Greetings, Catfish |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Medic
![]() Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 168
Downloads: 145
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 96
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
A clear statement containing facts! Thanks for putting this up Neal
![]() ![]() ![]() Enter the boycot sig ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Navy Dude
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 177
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
OK, the way I see this situation now- you're comments, please:
XI definitely pulled an ugly trick, make no mistake. I never heard of anything like this. But, we still are left in the sadows concerning Seawolves. So, SH3 devs & Ubi turned down but apparently nevertheless, as copyright owners, greenlighted it's release. Now Ubi is 'considering' to release their add-on, even though everyone thought it was supposed to be under development. Not accepting XI's offer at first place makes reason if Ubi is planning to release their add-on. But why suddenly approve SW after all? XI can release SW with or without the mods but as copyright owners Ubi in fact has the ball. They can pull the plug or OK XI's product. So, maybe instead of bombarding XI (which they wholeheartedly deserve) we should turn our eyes on Ubi and demand answers. What's going on? How did it turn into this? What's happening next? If they know anything about small thing called public relations they should come out with definive answers and rather quickly, too. Not all publicity is good publicity. Sorry if I've missed some facts explaining the whole situation. I made up my mind long ago not to buy SW and haven't really been keeping track on things lately. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Frogman
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 296
Downloads: 91
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I posted this earlier:
Quote:
Unless UBI gets an injunction against X1, it is unlikely they'll be stopped by us- sad, but going by X1's own position they never intended the online community as the sales target. They'll ship the product, collect the advance, and disappear. Filing suit after the fact may prove to be too little, too late as the perpatrators will be hard to trace, let alone serve with summons. People have questioned the intelligence of X1 for their actions. I think they're quite intelligent, and most likely have thought out many of their actions. They are also reacting to our actions. After attempts to bluff failed, they tried to legitimize their work. When that failed they've resorted to modification of mods in an attempt to distance their product from the original. When/if this fails, they'll try something else. In the meantime they'll get closer to their launch date, and then they'll rush it out the door and collect their cash. What recourse will we have then? By the time anyone brings a case to court (and who has the resources to do that?), they'll have vanished, or at the very least they'll have their profits to fight the battle. I think they're gambling against anyone actually suing them. The boycott is a step in the right direction, but to be effective we need to expand it. We must attack the publishers and distributors and any store which plans to sell this. We should get the media involved, and invite the CEOs/PR managers of the companies to discuss their position. I've done this before, and it's an effective tactic- most businesses prefer not to end up on camera, period. They'll usually work off-camera to resolve any disputes- almost every US news channel has an "On your side" segment or something like that, and in the UK they have "Watchdog". We don't need to be threatening or abusive; the sheer numbers of complaints about X1's practices, along with questions about a company's position regarding such practices and their intentions in this matter should give most of these fellows a pause for thought. X1 thinks they can dismiss the online community, without realizing the 20% online is 100% around the world, and able to reach anywhere and everywhere. If we are serious about stopping X1, and preventing another one from springing up in its stead, we need to expand our circle of influence. Ultimately, however, UBI needs to issue a statement for or against X1. They could stop the release with the stroke of a pen, or call of our dogs the same way. If they heartily endorse X1, they should say so and ask us to back off. If they oppose its release, again, they should let it be known clearly. Abraham the Lawgiver ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I have already contacted several members of the popular media bringing this matter to their attention.
Although I have not recieved any direct responses yet I feel confident that they will be all over this. They love a good drama after all. But even if it gets published 1.) It wll be too late and 2.) It will be a small audiance. Maybe at least it will bring Silent Hunter III to the eyes of some who do not know it exists and they will run out and buy a copy. Then again its possile that X1 will buy some advertising space in the magazine(s) and webazines which will snuff out the story like a wet candle. Thats just the nature of the beast. Very few popular media outlets act "fair and unbiased". Be on notice X1 the matter HAS been brought to the popular media's attention. Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|