![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 | |
Soaring
|
![]()
It is said that SSDs do not need to be defragmentised, that it even can be harmful to the durability of an SSD to do so. However, Noel Carboni'S severla comments here
https://www.askwoody.com/forums/topi...youre-getting/ kept me wondering whether that really is true. He insists that SSDs do fragmentise, but that it plays a less prominent role due to their much faster access time, however, people in the knowledge he claim to know who do it once per year. Then there is the alterntive to use TRIM command instead. Anyone in the knowledge about SSD and the need to fragmentise or not to do so? Lets ignore the faster access time, everybody knows that. What about other factors to decide between SSD and HD? And if it is reliability before speed what you want, is an NAS-certified HD like WD's Red Pro series the option of choice? Finally, how long is the durability of SSDs today, lets say very good ones like they say Samsung builds them? Are they to be replaced every two years? Do they last shorter, muchz longer today? Noel Carboni says he uses some for over five years now - without a single dropout so far. Also, consider this: https://www.hanselman.com/blog/TheRe...ntYourSSD.aspx Quote:
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|