![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Born to Run Silent
|
![]()
Well, any barriers left? What about the SEALs? Do you think women will ever be SEALs? Not counting a butch Demi Moore, of course.
__________________
SUBSIM - 26 Years on the Web |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Between test depth and periscope depth
Posts: 3,021
Downloads: 175
Uploads: 16
|
![]()
Eventually sure, women will be SEALs. And there are no barriers left. Combat roles have been opened up to women. Here's the link.
http://news.yahoo.com/ap-sources-pan...-politics.html
__________________
USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G) Comms Div 2003-2006 Qualified 19 November 03 Yes I was really on a submarine. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
As long as the standards are equal, I have no problem. I met tons of women in the military that could kick my butt without breaking a sweat.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Between test depth and periscope depth
Posts: 3,021
Downloads: 175
Uploads: 16
|
![]()
As of right now there are still two separate standards. No word yet on a single standard. But in order for this to truly be a victory for women's rights they need a single standard, preferably the current male standard.
__________________
USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G) Comms Div 2003-2006 Qualified 19 November 03 Yes I was really on a submarine. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Cold War Boomer
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Walla Walla
Posts: 2,837
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Women on submarines can only lead to one thing ... "Change is on the way"
change on how to operate the head that is: ![]() Quote:
If you didn't eat it ... don't flush it
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 786
Downloads: 254
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Not saying there aren't 1 out of maybe millions of woman who are more like men when it comes to strength. The truth is, WE ARE NOT THE SAME!! men and woman ARE engineered differently. During non combat/wars, sure, give the woman the opportunity to serve as infantry, let them feel worthy in that regard. but don't kid yourself, a full platoon of woman vs men, the outcome doesn't take a genius to know what would happen. Men are stronger than woman, period. Now, strength doesn't always mean everything as an infantry men, obviously self reliance and endurance play a role, but being strong is a big part of the action. That said, I personally don't know 1 single female that can pick up a 220 lb. man over her shoulders from the ground dead weight and run. Not to mention, if there is a future world war, with fox holes and long hours on the fronts, woman and men should not be mingling together. Why is it all of a sudden bad to say these things? let France and other nations do it, not the strongest fighting force in the world. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Between test depth and periscope depth
Posts: 3,021
Downloads: 175
Uploads: 16
|
![]()
If they get rid of the double standard, why not? The ones that want to join will have to be able to meet that standard, if they can't then they can't join just like anyone else. Same for the ones that are in now, when the standard is the same the ones that can't meet it can get a nice admin separation and a ticket home. Thus ensuring only those qualified are serving.
__________________
USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G) Comms Div 2003-2006 Qualified 19 November 03 Yes I was really on a submarine. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|