![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Could we catch a ride?
NASA announced Tuesday that it signed a contract with the Russian space agency to shuttle US astronauts to the orbiting International Space Station. The 335 million dollar contract extension is for the "transportation, rescue and related services" of US crew bound for the ISS in 2013, NASA said in a statement. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Soyuz is a very reliable ride too....
Would be nice if Russia could help develop a new shuttle. They had the Klipper idea but needed ESA investment which France I think vetoed. I think it was more to do with French pride than anything else. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
Must be the cheapest option one would presume
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
Nah...Top Gear will do it for free.
![]() ![]()
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. ![]() To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 1,956
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Russia needs money hand over fist so I highly doubt Soyuz flights will be denied any time soon. Tho we do need to start work on a replacement shuttle.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,731
Downloads: 393
Uploads: 12
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
"Never ask a World War II history buff for a 'final solution' to your problem!" |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Wayfaring Stranger
|
![]()
JFK must be spinning in his grave right now.
![]()
__________________
![]() Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
I think the Soyuz is a fantastic system, and when I say that we really need to get past it I don't mean to disrespect it. But we really DO need to move space science forward. It bothers me that as of this year, Soyuz will again be the "premiere" system for working in space - a 45-year-old system that is essentially riding atop a 55-year-old "7" series ICBM. The big, big selling point of space exploration for me is not saving money and cutting corners - it has to advance science and engineering with technology that will later be transferable for more down-to-earth uses. If we're not pushing the envelope at all, I think we're really limiting not only what we can do in space exploration, but what space exploration can do for us in the long run.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|