SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-07, 08:10 AM   #1
sonar732
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central MO
Posts: 1,562
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default Pentagon abandons active-duty time limits

Hey all,

I just came across this today, and as a Missouri National Guard 175th MPBN member, we were talking in depth amongst ourselves about the 20,000 troop increase.
sonar732 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-07, 09:30 AM   #2
Bill Nichols
Master of Defense
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,502
Downloads: 125
Uploads: 0
Default

A person I work with, who is a former nuclear engineer on USS Seawolf, is being recalled to active duty to do civil engineering in Afghanistan
__________________
My Dangerous Waters website:
Bill Nichols is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-07, 10:58 AM   #3
Konovalov
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: High Wycombe, Bucks, UK
Posts: 2,811
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Nichols
A person I work with, who is a former nuclear engineer on USS Seawolf, is being recalled to active duty to do civil engineering in Afghanistan
The forgotten war. I wish him luck and a safe return from his tour. Dangerous place over there from what I have seen, in particular Kunar and Helmand province.
__________________
"In a Christian context, sexuality is traditionally seen as a consequence of the Fall, but for Muslims, it is an anticipation of paradise. So I can say, I think, that I was validly converted to Islam by a teenage French Jewish nudist." Sheikh Abdul-Hakim Murad (Timothy Winter)

Last edited by Konovalov; 01-12-07 at 11:25 AM.
Konovalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-07, 11:14 AM   #4
waste gate
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

20, 000 more troops. I didn't hear any uproar when Charlie Rangel (D-NY) was calling for a re-instatement of the draft.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-07, 11:35 AM   #5
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waste gate
20, 000 more troops. I didn't hear any uproar when Charlie Rangel (D-NY) was calling for a re-instatement of the draft.
Because everyone knew it was a symbolic gesture just like it was before.
bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-07, 11:49 AM   #6
Schatten
Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 212
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradclark1
Quote:
Originally Posted by waste gate
20, 000 more troops. I didn't hear any uproar when Charlie Rangel (D-NY) was calling for a re-instatement of the draft.
Because everyone knew it was a symbolic gesture just like it was before.
I saw some interviews with him over that whole deal and he wasn't acting like it was symbolic, he really wants to do it. He also doesn't like it when you point out to him his military demographic figures aren't correct either.
__________________

Schatten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-07, 11:55 AM   #7
waste gate
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradclark1
Quote:
Originally Posted by waste gate
20, 000 more troops. I didn't hear any uproar when Charlie Rangel (D-NY) was calling for a re-instatement of the draft.
Because everyone knew it was a symbolic gesture just like it was before.
What is symbolic about conscription?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-07, 12:42 PM   #8
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

He didn't expect it to go. What he was implying was that if we are in a war everyone should help pull the weight so we should reinstate the draft. If you aren't prepared to reinstate the draft don't start a war.
bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-07, 12:52 PM   #9
waste gate
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradclark1
He didn't expect it to go. What he was implying was that if we are in a war everyone should help pull the weight so we should reinstate the draft. If you aren't prepared to reinstate the draft don't start a war.
Oh, I see, he was just fooling around?!! That's leadership. Now I will take what he, and his fellow Democrates, more seriously. Thank you for the heads up.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-07, 12:57 PM   #10
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

My pleasure.
bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-07, 03:45 PM   #11
tycho102
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,100
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waste gate
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradclark1
Quote:
Originally Posted by waste gate
20, 000 more troops. I didn't hear any uproar when Charlie Rangel (D-NY) was calling for a re-instatement of the draft.
Because everyone knew it was a symbolic gesture just like it was before.
What is symbolic about conscription?
Because he knows the bill would never even be put up for a vote. It's just an attempt to show the "hypocricy" of the Congress.

Personally, I still want us the hell out of Iraq. At this point, our people are dying over there for no good reason. We hit back the moslems and destablized the region. Absolutely without question -- Mission Accomplished. Get the hell out and let islam take care of itself. The Shi'a will annhilate the Sunni. Some of the refugees will infiltrate Saudi Arabia, where they'll start bombing pipelines. Iran will fund them. That will drive up the price of oil, and Exxon and Shell and BP and Phillips and Mobil will make HUGE profit margins. 60-70%. We'll get the hell off oil, and stop funding jihad against us. Dude, I'm not even kidding. Let Iran take over. Had we pulled our 38,000 from Korea and our 100,000 from Europe, we might have been able to secure the borders and stop jihadist infiltration. We might have been able to displace the civilian population in areas long enough to identify insurgents. Had we set up an identification database, we might have been able to identify recruited insurgents. But we didn't, and 20,000 isn't going to do it.

As for the active reservists, otherwise known as "citizen-soldiers", they signed up. If you are not prepared to fulfill your contract, don't sign up. That's it -- black and white. I might have a different opinion if we had a conscription, but we don't. Don't sign up if you aren't prepared to do the job.


Also, on the topic of the UCMJ, don't do nude photos while wearing any article of your uniform. If your commander officer orders you to cease an affair with subordinate enlisted member, do so immediately. And don't expect the "delete" key to actually delete your top-secret communication records.


That is all.
tycho102 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-07, 04:14 PM   #12
Schatten
Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 212
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waste gate
Oh, I see, he was just fooling around?!! That's leadership. Now I will take what he, and his fellow Democrates, more seriously. Thank you for the heads up.
I don't they're joking around either.

Remember John Kerry is on the Armed Services Committee and the Dems hold him up to be a voice of authority on military matters and he's more than once said that an all volunteer military is a Very Bad Thing(tm) because it leads to "militarism" and other bad things. Other bad things probably being professionalism and efficiency, can't have those ya know.

So on one hand we have our professional military full of people who generally want to be there, who are motivated and well trained. On the other in a liberal ideal world we'd have a non-militaristic military full of conscripts who don't want to be there and definately don't want to have to go fight anywhere.

If you a look at what the readiness, morale and even court-martial levels for the early '70s draft army, the one that wasn't fighting in Vietnam anymore, and the volunteer one of today you'll see that the ideal "everyone pitching in their fair share whether they want to or not" military is a really, really bad idea. Especially when you're fighting a war.

Granted it did work in World War II, but that was a different time and we were definately a different sort of people in general. Back then we fought to win wars, instead of looking for the nicest euphemism ("Phased Redeployment" seems to be the term de jour) to use when we decide to lose one.

Withdrawl from Iraq right now is a whole other topic, but in general I believe that doing it now with the way the situation is would lead to even more problems than what is happening daily there now. If we withdraw before the Iraqis can get a handle on the situation and Iraq becomes Afghanistan circa 2000 all over again then a couple/few years down the road we'll be getting what we deserve for not finishing what we started.
__________________

Schatten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-07, 11:41 PM   #13
Yahoshua
The Old Man
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,493
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

A withdrawl is a defeat. If we're going to win this war we're going to be there for a long long time.

By win, I mean setting up the Iraqi gov't on it's own feet and making it capable of running day-to-day operations so they can continue fighting the ground war for us. The U.S will still be there on a support basis but our position in the war will decrease substantially. When the insurgency ceases, we've won.
__________________
Science is the organized unpredictability that strives not to set limits to mans' capabilities, but is the engine by which the limits of mans' understanding is defined-Yahoshua



Yahoshua is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-07, 12:20 PM   #14
U-533
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: On my Boat
Posts: 594
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Reinstate the draft?

HA!

These punks would shoot themselves in the foot.....

Then we tax payers will have to keep feeding them.
U-533 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-07, 01:52 PM   #15
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Has regular armed forces ever defeated an insurgency in history? I can't think of one time.
Anyone?
bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.