![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: If one class of Japanese BB had to omitted from SHIV, which one would you choose? | |||
Kongo class (Kongo, Kirishima, Hiei, Haruna) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 8.00% |
Fuso class (Fuso, Yamashiro) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 24.00% |
Ise class (Ise, Hyuga) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 30.00% |
Nagato class (Nagato, Mutsu) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 6.00% |
Yamato class (Yamato, Musashi) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 32.00% |
Voters: 50. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,878
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
We discussed something like this before, but it is probable that we cannot have every single class of warship in SHIV (even though I know we all would like that. So, out of the four classes of Japanese BB's, which one would everone choose to be the least important if one had to be omited? I have no idea how many the Dev's plan on including, although the Yamato class will definitely be there (they did say so somewhere) and I thought I saw the Fuso class in a screenshot somewhere (that particular shot did not look like concept art) - don't remember where I saw it though.
In SHI, we got all five, although the only Ise version was the half-carrier one. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|