Dangerous Sequence Of Events

Mike 'Red Ocktober' Hense · 07-21-06, 07:58 AM

in my position as expert military analyst for the Bland Corporation (ref. Sellers, Kubrick, Strangelove PHD, lit) i am noticing what might be movement towards the initial use of tactical nuclear weapons by the Isreali military in the current crisis over there...

the recent warnings for civilians to evacuate 20 miles away from the border region is where i'm centering this observation and conclusion...

why 20 miles...

anyways... this is not first hand info... so if anyone can confirm that this is in fact the case (it is 20 miles as opposed to 20 km) i'd be quite appreciative...

hey... the Bland Corporation, while very well funded, doesn't have the best intelligence gathering capabilites in the world... we've all got big homes and fast cars and yachts... but our intel is just a bit thin...

hey... what can i say...

--Mike

NeonSamurai · 07-21-06, 08:55 AM

I would be surprized if they would pull out tactical nukes at this point. Infact that would be utterly insane of them if they did.

Most likely they are planning on expanding their theater of operations and are giving warning to the civilians in an effort to minimise civilian casualties.

Skybird · 07-21-06, 10:19 AM

They won't use nukes, full stop. This thread is needless.

bradclark1 · 07-21-06, 10:20 AM

Range of rockets would sound like a good reason to me.
Nukes? No there isn't a reason to use nukes. I'm sure Israeli nukes are for last stands.

bradclark1 · 07-21-06, 10:21 AM

HAH. My reply is longer than Skybird's. I feel special now.

Mike 'Red Ocktober' Hense · 07-21-06, 10:32 AM

well... i hope you are all right...

but the sentiment here at the Bland Corp is otherwise...

--Mike

Fish · 07-21-06, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike 'Red Ocktober' Hense

well... i hope you are all right...

but the sentiment here at the Bland Corp is otherwise...

--Mike

Is "Bland " not just a other word for superficial?

Mike 'Red Ocktober' Hense · 07-21-06, 11:02 AM

close enough...

but the name BLAND was undoubtedly chosen due to it's more than passing phonetic simlarity to RAND...

the RAND Corp... the BLAND Corp...

get it... the RAND Corp... a hi tech, military industrial think tank...

google it... there's more there than just this

--Mike

STEED · 07-21-06, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skybird

They won't use nukes, full stop. This thread is needless.

Here, here.

Mike 'Red Ocktober' Hense · 07-21-06, 11:39 AM

well... time will tell... surely i hope that the BLAND Corporation is wrong in its assesment...

but, objective analysis of the military movements so far, and the subsequent responses by the
opposing sides, tend to make this a definite possibility which cannot be ignored...

remember where you heard it first when you wake up and there it is on the news...

--Mike

tycho102 · 07-21-06, 12:09 PM

There are two conditions under which Israel will start dropping and launching nuclear weapons.

One is when they are nuked, first. If Israel is nuked, there's no telling what the hell is going to happen. If it was me, knowing as much about Islam and the Koran as I now do, I would recognize it as a perceived weakness when all the muslims would be immediately incited to invade. I was moderated in another thread for posting exactly what I'd do, so I'll just leave this particular paragraph as it is.

Two is when they are invaded by a conventional armed mass. Troops. And if the troops had passed into the borders, and Israel was facing annhilation of it's population through conventional warfare, they would launch. Again, because it would be Jordan/Syria/Lebanon/Saudi Arabia/Qatar/Egypt against Israel, they are likely to retaliate against all of them. The muslim clergy stand united against the Jews, so it's highly probable they'll fall together, too.

There is the distinct possibility that, given certain targets, this would have the after effect of fracturing Islam -- not along sectarian lines, but along gang affiliation. There would be thousands of ambitious imams attempting to gain greater influence and become an ayatollah, leading to an entirely new inter-muslim conflict that Islam hasn't seen since it's founding.

Kapitan · 07-21-06, 02:08 PM

The use of nuclear weapons on a country that doesnt have nuclear weapons is unfair and unjust

Skybird · 07-21-06, 03:53 PM

Eevry kind of war is always and necessarily unfair and unjust, kapitan. not only nuclear ones - every kind of war causes innocent victims. That's why they call it "war". Fairness and justice are categories by which war cannot be defined.

Mike 'Red Ocktober' Hense · 07-21-06, 03:54 PM

it's worse than that... it's suicide...

the fallout has no political affiliation... last time i heard...

this next war will be quite fair... everyone will die...

--Mike

scandium · 07-21-06, 05:41 PM

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." -Einstein

07-21-06, 07:58 AM	#1
Mike 'Red Ocktober' Hense Commander Join Date: Sep 2001 Posts: 445 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	Dangerous Sequence Of Events in my position as expert military analyst for the Bland Corporation (ref. Sellers, Kubrick, Strangelove PHD, lit) i am noticing what might be movement towards the initial use of tactical nuclear weapons by the Isreali military in the current crisis over there... the recent warnings for civilians to evacuate 20 miles away from the border region is where i'm centering this observation and conclusion... why 20 miles... anyways... this is not first hand info... so if anyone can confirm that this is in fact the case (it is 20 miles as opposed to 20 km) i'd be quite appreciative... hey... the Bland Corporation, while very well funded, doesn't have the best intelligence gathering capabilites in the world... we've all got big homes and fast cars and yachts... but our intel is just a bit thin... hey... what can i say... --Mike

07-21-06, 08:55 AM	#2
NeonSamurai Ocean Warrior Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Socialist Republic of Kanadia Posts: 3,044 Downloads: 25 Uploads: 0	I would be surprized if they would pull out tactical nukes at this point. Infact that would be utterly insane of them if they did. Most likely they are planning on expanding their theater of operations and are giving warning to the civilians in an effort to minimise civilian casualties. __________________ SH3 Newbie Guide Links and other helpfull stuff

07-21-06, 10:19 AM	#3
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 42,624 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	They won't use nukes, full stop. This thread is needless. __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert.

07-21-06, 12:09 PM	#11
tycho102 Ace of the Deep Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 1,100 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	There are two conditions under which Israel will start dropping and launching nuclear weapons. One is when they are nuked, first. If Israel is nuked, there's no telling what the hell is going to happen. If it was me, knowing as much about Islam and the Koran as I now do, I would recognize it as a perceived weakness when all the muslims would be immediately incited to invade. I was moderated in another thread for posting exactly what I'd do, so I'll just leave this particular paragraph as it is. Two is when they are invaded by a conventional armed mass. Troops. And if the troops had passed into the borders, and Israel was facing annhilation of it's population through conventional warfare, they would launch. Again, because it would be Jordan/Syria/Lebanon/Saudi Arabia/Qatar/Egypt against Israel, they are likely to retaliate against all of them. The muslim clergy stand united against the Jews, so it's highly probable they'll fall together, too. There is the distinct possibility that, given certain targets, this would have the after effect of fracturing Islam -- not along sectarian lines, but along gang affiliation. There would be thousands of ambitious imams attempting to gain greater influence and become an ayatollah, leading to an entirely new inter-muslim conflict that Islam hasn't seen since it's founding. __________________ My little Silent Hunter 4 repository

07-21-06, 02:08 PM	#12
Kapitan Sub Test Pilot Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: UK + Canada Posts: 7,130 Downloads: 77 Uploads: 7	The use of nuclear weapons on a country that doesnt have nuclear weapons is unfair and unjust __________________ DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/

07-21-06, 10:20 AM	#4
bradclark1 Ocean Warrior Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Connecticut, USA. Posts: 2,794 Downloads: 29 Uploads: 0	Range of rockets would sound like a good reason to me. Nukes? No there isn't a reason to use nukes. I'm sure Israeli nukes are for last stands.

07-21-06, 10:21 AM	#5
bradclark1 Ocean Warrior Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Connecticut, USA. Posts: 2,794 Downloads: 29 Uploads: 0	HAH. My reply is longer than Skybird's. I feel special now.

07-21-06, 10:32 AM	#6
Mike 'Red Ocktober' Hense Commander Join Date: Sep 2001 Posts: 445 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	well... i hope you are all right... but the sentiment here at the Bland Corp is otherwise... --Mike

07-21-06, 11:02 AM	#8
Mike 'Red Ocktober' Hense Commander Join Date: Sep 2001 Posts: 445 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	close enough... but the name BLAND was undoubtedly chosen due to it's more than passing phonetic simlarity to RAND... the RAND Corp... the BLAND Corp... get it... the RAND Corp... a hi tech, military industrial think tank... google it... there's more there than just this --Mike

07-21-06, 11:39 AM	#10
Mike 'Red Ocktober' Hense Commander Join Date: Sep 2001 Posts: 445 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	well... time will tell... surely i hope that the BLAND Corporation is wrong in its assesment... but, objective analysis of the military movements so far, and the subsequent responses by the opposing sides, tend to make this a definite possibility which cannot be ignored... remember where you heard it first when you wake up and there it is on the news... --Mike

07-21-06, 03:53 PM	#13
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 42,624 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	Eevry kind of war is always and necessarily unfair and unjust, kapitan. not only nuclear ones - every kind of war causes innocent victims. That's why they call it "war". Fairness and justice are categories by which war cannot be defined. __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert.

07-21-06, 03:54 PM	#14
Mike 'Red Ocktober' Hense Commander Join Date: Sep 2001 Posts: 445 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	it's worse than that... it's suicide... the fallout has no political affiliation... last time i heard... this next war will be quite fair... everyone will die... --Mike

07-21-06, 05:41 PM	#15
scandium Ace of the Deep Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 1,098 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." -Einstein __________________ What can you do against the lunatic who is more intelligent than yourself, who gives your arguments a fair hearing and then simply persists in his lunacy? -- George Orwell