![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Olympus Mons, Mars
Posts: 184
Downloads: 115
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
i have a 2 part question for the community:
1. Any plans to mod/patch or otherwise implement a stand-off ASW weapon for U.S subs in DW? 2. Whats the current consensus/development on these weapons in NATO or USN? (any truth in rumors about Sealance coming back, or some advanced SUBROC design?) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
1) patch is being worked on
2) its doubtful the russian are the only ones that i know of that have any weapons like subroc ss-n-16 and ss-n-27 ASW
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Olympus Mons, Mars
Posts: 184
Downloads: 115
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
hmm. what about supercavs for U.S subs? i know the yanks are testing supercavitating torps (like the skvall), but not sure how the development is coming along or whether they could even be launched by exisitng platforms.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
They're not likely to be useful in future conflicts. Everyone is planning on a fight in "littoral" seas, which makes long range detections unlikely. Those sorts of stand-off weapons were intended to take advantage of convergence zone detections which you just won't get in shallow waters. I doubt the Sealance will come back. There's not really any need for it. It turned into the VLA. The SUBROC was a tactical nuclear weapon, and it's unlikely those will come back either. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Olympus Mons, Mars
Posts: 184
Downloads: 115
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Concur. but one scenario I might envisage a standoff weapon being used is with an integrated data link wherein the detecting platform may not be able to or may not want to deploy its own weapon and passes on the link data to a submarine firing a standoff weapon.
*shrug*....could work. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
doubtful
and its not the americans that are testing a super cav torpedo its the germans that are still designing it
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
There's all kinds of remote sensors and networks that people are experimenting with right now. Those are future systems, though. Assuming they're deployed at all, they probably won't make an appearence for decades. There's definitely an interest in remote sensors as a way to improve detection ranges, though and maybe someday people will start thinking about standoff weapons again, but for now they're not really necessary. In the abscence of a good CZ, or nuclear weapons standoff weapons are not really useful on submarines right now. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Olympus Mons, Mars
Posts: 184
Downloads: 115
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
"The ability to kill a target before it can react also can be achieved through very high speeds as opposed to stealth. Being investigated is the development of a very-high-speed, autonomous, highly maneuverable, homing torpedo capable of speeds significantly in excess of those achieved by the current Mk48 torpedo. Using "supercavitation" technology, a torpedo becomes an underwater missile. In this approach, the water near the tip of the projectile (or torpedo) vaporizes, producing a vapor pocket that results in a dramatic reduction in drag. The same technology, applied to a range of weapons from bullets to torpedoes, offers additional operational capabilities against a spectrum of targets." this comes from http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/july_02_43.php. it implies this technology is being worked on by the US Navy. i'd imagine many other navies are looking at it as well, it is arguably the future of torpedo design. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|