Plan A - A Nuclear war simulation

mapuc · 09-19-19, 12:47 PM

I have seen this video a few times by now and still I can't put my fingers on where it's incorrect.

Maybe it ain't maybe it is correct all the way (4.18 min.)

Quote:

Based on the current US and Russia war plans, 91.5 million people would be either dead (34.1 million) or injured (57.4 million) within just a few hours of the start of the conflict.

https://www.iflscience.com/editors-b...rStfd_EaU6Ux4c

Markus

Rockstar · 09-19-19, 02:03 PM

Hmmm, might be a good idea to start looking for property in Peru.

Onkel Neal · 09-19-19, 02:19 PM

Yeah, poor Canada be thinking 'WTH!?"

Julhelm · 09-19-19, 02:30 PM

No more more than 95 million killed, tops. Depending on the breaks.

mapuc · 09-19-19, 02:39 PM

If the unthinkable would happen it doesn't matter where you move to.

In case you want to survive the nuclear holocaust

The fallout from all these nukes will sooner or later have spread all around the world.

Markus

Julhelm · 09-19-19, 03:42 PM

Unlikely. Modern warheads in the .3 to 1mt range simply do not loft the debris that high, so it will rain out over a few days.

ET2SN · 09-19-19, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Julhelm

No more more than 95 million killed, tops. Depending on the breaks.

For those of us old enough to get the context:

https://hobbydb-production.s3.amazon...0Turgidson.jpg

Catfish · 09-20-19, 01:19 AM

It seems to be hip nowadays to look at the possibility of a limited regional winnable nuclear war with less fallout, with smaller nuclear warheads and other 'smart' weapons, so deterrence will not hold some back.
Whatever will become of those who have to live there. Some russian hawks say that radiation is not as bad, and people will adapt quickly

Looking from outside this seems like the perfect way to finally have more wars again, oh joy.

09-19-19, 02:19 PM	#3
Onkel Neal Born to Run Silent Join Date: Jan 1997 Location: Cougar Trap, Texas Posts: 21,383 Downloads: 541 Uploads: 224	Yeah, poor Canada be thinking 'WTH!?" __________________ SUBSIM - 26 Years on the Web

09-20-19, 01:19 AM	#8
Catfish Dipped Squirrel Operative Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: ..where the ocean meets the sky Posts: 17,766 Downloads: 38 Uploads: 0	It seems to be hip nowadays to look at the possibility of a limited regional winnable nuclear war with less fallout, with smaller nuclear warheads and other 'smart' weapons, so deterrence will not hold some back. Whatever will become of those who have to live there. Some russian hawks say that radiation is not as bad, and people will adapt quickly Looking from outside this seems like the perfect way to finally have more wars again, oh joy. __________________ >^..^<*)))>{ All generalizations are wrong.

09-19-19, 02:03 PM	#2
Rockstar In the Brig Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Zendia Bar & Grill Posts: 12,614 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	Hmmm, might be a good idea to start looking for property in Peru.

09-19-19, 02:30 PM	#4
Julhelm Seasoned Skipper Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: The Icy North Posts: 693 Downloads: 189 Uploads: 0	No more more than 95 million killed, tops. Depending on the breaks.

09-19-19, 02:39 PM	#5
mapuc CINC Pacific Fleet Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Denmark Posts: 20,537 Downloads: 37 Uploads: 0	If the unthinkable would happen it doesn't matter where you move to. In case you want to survive the nuclear holocaust The fallout from all these nukes will sooner or later have spread all around the world. Markus

09-19-19, 03:42 PM	#6
Julhelm Seasoned Skipper Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: The Icy North Posts: 693 Downloads: 189 Uploads: 0	Unlikely. Modern warheads in the .3 to 1mt range simply do not loft the debris that high, so it will rain out over a few days.