![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: No Longer On A Big Grey Floaty Thing
Posts: 395
Downloads: 116
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Back after a long break and wanted to share this tidbit.
Going home to Lorient after a relatively unsuccessful patrol in the Gibraltar approaches. My trusty VIIC/41 is plowing through pouring rain and high seas off of Portugal, late at night in fall of 1942. My inner kaluen is thinking this thunderstorm may well turn into a hurricane. Not to mention the uneasy feeling. We go to 70 meters and kill the engines, running an acoustic check. I change the watch to the more experienced crew and man the hydrophones. Nothing. After a good hour, we surface and hit the radar on. I don't want to take any chances, despite being less than 15 kilometers from neutral shores. Theoreticaly, there should be minimal, if any, traffic, and mostly people NOT out to kill us. Hence the reason we choose this route on the way home with a damaged sub, having been escorted from a convoy by some lively English chaps who shared my love of things that go BOOM. But I digress. The thunderstorm is really whipping up, with 28 knot winds and waves crashing over the deck. The officers agree that we should take cover in a neutral port, and a course is laid in for the nearest inlet: El Ferrol, I believe. 36 minutes later, we are 2 kilometers away when a shape rises out of the gloom. The bloody Nelson and Rodney are sitting five hundred+ meters away. As far as I can tell, their escorts had their radar and recievers off and we had been at a perfect angle to slip in between them. I don't care about medals, tonnage or promotions. That inner kaluen is taking over as 18 VERY BIG cannons point at us as the radar finally picks up 14 contacts. One carrier and 11 DDs. Sadly, a single volley is all it takes. My u-boat is lost with all her gallant crew. And the only Bernard I can blame is in the radar factory. The only thing I can think: Murphy's Law of Combat 75(?): Radar tends to fail at night and in bad weather, and especially during both.
__________________
"That flag and I are twins, born in the same hour from the same womb of destiny. We cannot be parted in life or in death; so long as we float, we shall float together." As much as I dislike it sometimes, I'm a tin can sailor, through and through. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virgina Beach
Posts: 1,301
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well the faulty radar is actuly a bug. In high sea states the radar dosent turn back on after being washed over.
__________________
"Some ships are designed to sink… others require our assistance." ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,639
Downloads: 75
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I find radar in general to be pretty much a waste of time in SH3.
As was pointed out, in foul weather, when you need it most, it keeps cutting out when water hits it. But with map contacts turned off, it's next to useless. It's very difficult to get a contact to show on the oscilloscope when you actually have visual contact of the target. I don't think I was ever able to use the radar manually successfully in a combat environment. I think by the time you got it to work you'd have broadcast your position many times over. The Type XXI is supposed to have a PPI indicator (like this: ![]() Steve |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 908
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Historically, German radar was not that great and notoriously unreliable. The infamous METOX system also had a nasty habit of telling everyone where you were at. The radar bug in SH3 accidentally emulates the poor reliability of German radar. I never use it. It is easier for me to go deep and go silent while relying on hydrophones and instinct, risking detection rather than go on the surface blind in a storm.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 495
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I have read that over the course of the war, the Germans tried several different things to improve the low U-boat visibility problem.
As you sit so low in the water your range is limited to the horizon, or roughly 16km from surface level. Which is a laughably small area when compared to the total size of the Atlantic and the places that a convoy can hide. Radar was intended to give the crew visibility beyond the level of the horizon. Also in response to the allied improvements to convoy defense. With radar, theoretically, you could spot the ships electronically and plot your intercept course without having to get close enough to risk detection by any escorts who may be on sweep patrol. But it was unreliable. The field of micro electronics had be largely overlooked in Germany, while the allies put it to great effect. The Germans were always playing 'catch up' in the arms race. All these measures were done to extend the life of the U-boats currently in service, when they should have just built a better boat. Essentially they were fixing all the wrong problems. The early sets were big bulky things rigidly attached the the structure of the conning tower. But the search area is still too small. What like, +-15 degrees on each side of 0. In order to scan a full circle, you'd have to sail the boat around the same. A time consuming process under normal conditions, impossible to perform during battle. Later sets, equipped with rotating antennas solved some of these problems, but it was still a crapshoot. At other times, they resorted to strapping a luckless bosun into a chair and strapped said chair to the periscope mast, in an attempt to get more visual range. And the Bachstelze or 'water-wagtail'. A sort of kite/gyrocopter towed behind the surfaced uboat, with a man with binoculars to scan, up in the air. The main drawback to these is that crash diving is not possible without sacrificing the crewman in question. These alternate methods of extending u-boat visibility only met with minor success and were not done on more than 2 or 3 occasions. The cons simply outweighed the pros. Fortunately, they stayed with the electronic detection method.
__________________
Because I'm the captain, that's why! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,639
Downloads: 75
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I'm just surprised that they Germans did not invest more in radar decoys in the Bay of Biscay to keep the air patrols on a goose chase.
I know they tried the hydrogen foil balloons cut lose from subs, but I'm surprised they did not just routinely air-drop thousands of them into the Bay of Biscay. Watch the Allies swoop down on nothing all day and night long. Steve |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|