![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-1...report/5738036
Major development to be put up on Russia's coast on the Sea of Japan 18 km from the Chinese border. Freight volumes being talked about are massive. Putin is certainly playing the China relationship in a way that appears to be well beyond US, EU or Australian governments. Being neighbours they can do that for things like ports, but in terms of getting closer economic ties than just buying consumer goods from China or exporting natural resources to it, the Russian's are really standing out from the crowd. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
Thanks for the link. I'd heard of that previously but didn't make the link from the article.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
More potential assets to argue and fight over in the future.
Just jealous ![]() That should firmly tip the balance of power in the region. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
Russia tried to sit on the fense between the Western and Asian integration. Recent events in Ukraine have firmly shifted Russia's focus towards the Asian integration, thus making Russian membership in such organisations more important.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Soaring
|
![]()
Not really, Moscow tried to close ties with China since some longer tjme already, but so far the price demanded by China to allow that, wwas considered to be too high. With the need to find replacements for the losses frum suffering relations with the West, Moscow could not afford to refuse all Chinese-demanded concessions and conditions anymore.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Only five responses to one of the biggest naval ports I have heard of in a long time.
Edward Teller (father of the H bomb) tried to interest the USN to build a port in Alaska back in the 1950's. We should've listened, but that's just a pet peeve. Someone in Russia and China are listening and doing something ... They are friends, uh? from ikalugin's link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shangha...n_Organisation Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
The SCO is shaping up to be a major rival to western groups, whilst it is not a military organisation, there is an element of shared resources involved in it, exercises and that.
It's not inconceivable to consider the possibility of Russia and China creating a sort of new Pact to counter NATO military strength and projection. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]()
Is this really a case bigger is better?
__________________
![]() You see my dog don't like people laughing. He gets the crazy idea you're laughing at him. Now if you apologize like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 5,421
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The Sino-Russian relationship is unique to say the least. A good example of two nations with competing intrests getting along because share they common "foes" who are more dangerous to China and Russia.
Long term the military advantage between China and Russia will belong to the Chinese. China has the advantage that it avoids getting involved militarily in other parts of the world unlike Russia and the US. It would be interesting to the world in 2114. Look at all that changed from 1914 to 2114. One thing I can say without doubt is that empires never last forever and our empire (US) wont last 50 more years. The peak was during the Cold War one already fell in from within the other has lasted longer but also will fall from within. Last edited by Stealhead; 09-17-14 at 01:13 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
I think yes...eventually.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
60 million tonnes per year! Wow.
I wonder if the road/rail infrastructure can handle that
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Now due to the western sanctions over Ukraine we have to abandon the diversified approach, though we won't mind returning to status quo (as Lavrov said). Steelhead, Russian Empire is still sort of here, at least in the minds of people such as Strelkov. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,288
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I'm curious as to why an existing Far East port like Vladivostok couldn't upgraded to this purpose. Poor geography, location, infrastructure?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 5,421
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
That is a good question it does no provide an exact location beyond the fact that it is near North Korea and is on the Russian Sea of Japan Coast. Vladivostok is already in this same general area and is not far from the Chinese-Russian border so why not simply expand and modernize there? ![]() I recon infrastructure though Vladivostok is the major Russian city in this region which would mean that it has the best available infrastructure. Of course this port will be used to transport natural gas so I assume that they chose an area other than Vladivostok but in the same region to facilitate the construction of pipe lines and facilities that perhaps would be too much trouble in Vladivostok which is already pretty crowded. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|