SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-22-11, 06:23 PM   #1
vienna
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Anywhere but the here & now...
Posts: 7,711
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0


Default George H.W. Bush "unofficially" endorses Romney

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...dorses-romney/


BTW, Dan Quayle officially endorsed Romney on Dec. 6; I wnder if he spelled Mitts last name "Romknee"?...
vienna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-11, 11:58 PM   #2
em2nought
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,485
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

More reasons to choose Ron Paul
__________________
em2nought is ecstatic garbage!
em2nought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-11, 12:20 AM   #3
Sea Demon
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,552
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
Default

Of course he does. G.H.W. Bush and Romney are both part of the same milquetoast (so called moderate) GOP establishment. Makes perfect sense.
Sea Demon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-11, 01:38 PM   #4
vienna
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Anywhere but the here & now...
Posts: 7,711
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0


Default

What is really interesting is Bush did not endorse fellow Texan Rick Perry; wonder how Perry feels about the snub?...
vienna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-11, 01:46 PM   #5
CCIP
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Canada
Posts: 8,700
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 2


Default

Well it hasn't exactly been a secret up to now that the Bushes are not really fans of Perry...
__________________

There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers.
-Don Van Vliet
(aka Captain Beefheart)
CCIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-11, 01:51 PM   #6
vienna
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Anywhere but the here & now...
Posts: 7,711
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0


Default

Still, Bush could have just kept quiet and not gone public; you know, the old GOP 11th Commandment...
vienna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-11, 03:20 PM   #7
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,197
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Demon View Post
(so called moderate)
You mean moderate as opposed to "radical"?
__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-11, 03:41 PM   #8
Arlo
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,304
Downloads: 214
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vienna View Post
What is really interesting is Bush did not endorse fellow Texan Rick Perry; wonder how Perry feels about the snub?...
Well, it's not like he hasn't had months to get over it.

He's Rick Perry and he endorses himself.

Erg ... I posted in a political thread.

(Slinks away, blending into the enviroment .... running silent.)
__________________
-Arlo
Arlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-11, 04:44 PM   #9
Sea Demon
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,552
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August View Post
You mean moderate as opposed to "radical"?
No. I mean "so called moderate". As in willing to jump on the liberal bandwagon for political expediency if the situation dictates. The media defines them as "moderate"....hence the label "so called moderate" by me. "Radical" or "Moderate" as true terms are not what define either of these two politicians.
Sea Demon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-11, 05:35 PM   #10
CCIP
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Canada
Posts: 8,700
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 2


Default

I think it was gonna be Romney all along - and I'll totally agree that he is the establishment candidate. "Radical" and "moderate" may indeed be relative, but Romney is going to pull in the most money, that's already a given. The fact that he's not radical, not encouraging any drastic actions, and willing to play ball to get things moving makes him good for business, and good for drawing in those on the fence who are frankly turned off by the Tea Party, and don't belong to the neo-conservative target demographic.

So, the establishment is backing a professional politician who's willing to bend and twist to the demands of the situation rather than stick to a hard-set agenda, and who's able to get both party ranks and money behind him. What else is new?

The fact is, too, that come election time, you can only beat a flexible, establishment-backed politician with another flexible, establishment-backed politician. IMO if the GOP chose one of the more radical candidates, they'd pay for it in the end. Their backers and elder statesmen have been and are gonna be doing their best to prevent that from happening.

Contrary to how both sides' speaking tubes paint the picture, neither party is driven by a radical agenda in any substantial way. There are too many people in each of those parties with too much to lose to do that.
__________________

There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers.
-Don Van Vliet
(aka Captain Beefheart)
CCIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.