![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Loader
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado, summer/ Arizona, winter
Posts: 90
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I have been playing SH3 GWX for years and love it. SH4 if fun and a the WW2 action is in my interest area, but a lot of small issues on handeling the crew detract from it.
Is SH5 like a better SH3 ( graphics ), or way different in other ways. Have "ALL" of the BUGS been worked out? Mine you it is not the cost of the game, it's how good it is to play. Very glad to see that the controlling need to be on line has been fixed. Though I must say that having Steam controlling Civ 5 is great. All of the updates and patches are downloaded automaticaly while playing the game. So should I give invest some time in SH5? At age 74 My time is limited. Thanks for your input. SNAKE1937 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 908
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
While I have only had 5 for a short time, I can say with all confidence that III is still better. Vanilla SH 5 is nothing short of an Alpha release. Darkwraith's UI mod is a must. Likewise, the TDC appears to be broken, thanks to all of the silliness of including an "interactive" crew. As it stands, SH5 has way too many issues and bugs that demand further patching (i.e. "Rudder Right 180 Degrees"
![]() SH III works, SH 5 halfway works...even with mods. Stick with what works. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
Considering your situation as you described it, you might want to stick with what you know. SH5 lacks several of the gameplay functions of SH3, and it may be some time before those are added in.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]()
It occurs to me, SH5 really isn't a Submarine sim as any of us would think. More of a hybrid between Sim and an RPG in a Das Boat setting; doing neither particularly well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Castle of Delaware
Posts: 3,231
Downloads: 658
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
But you have to admit the graphics are supurb.
__________________
Gary No Borders, No Language, No Culture =s No Country I'm a Deplorable, and proud of it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]()
First person immersion without equal.
Personally, the RPG aspects as well as the sim aspects should be embraced and improved upon. Mainly because I think SH5 is fundamentally different from the previous two games. It's less of a submarine simulation, and more of a Uboat captain simulation. That and i've been playing entirely too many RPG's as of late, so i'm probably on some ill concieved RPG kick at the moment. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 908
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Agreed. The graphics are very impressive. Too bad we had to trade in most of our functions and our entire control scheme to get that. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: algarve-portugal
Posts: 12
Downloads: 44
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
both have good things and bad things
i prefer sh3,but sh5 with the help of the comunity its cool now,imo hasta |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|