SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-11, 09:30 PM   #1
jumpy
Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 2,139
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
So The Lesson is

That if you commit fraud, you can go back to your seat in the house of lords?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15594452

My reading of the article says so, the most of an imposition for these two convicted fraudsters is that their peers will suspend them from the house for the same length of time as their prison sentence for fraud, either after their sentence in prison is served, or to run from the date their sentence in prison started?

Quote:
The committee said it would be "inappropriate" for either of the two to be able to resume their duties in the House "before the whole sentence imposed by the court has run its course".
I fail to see why this is even relevant - both of them are guilty of misusing a public office. Neither of them should be allowed to serve the public in any further capacity.

Quote:
Originally Posted by privileges and conduct committee

Lord Taylor of Warwick

The Committee recommend that Lord Taylor of Warwick be suspended from the House for 12 months from 31 May 2011, the date on which he was sentenced at Southwark Crown Court. If this recommendation is accepted by the House of Lords, Lord Taylor of Warwick will not be able attend the House until the end of May 2012. The independent Lords Commissioner for Standards has found that Lord Taylor of Warwick wrongly claimed £24,311.70. He has repaid this amount in full.

Lord Hanningfield

The Committee recommend that Lord Hanningfield be suspended from the House for 9 months from 1 July 2011, the date on which he was sentenced at Maidstone Crown Court. If this recommendation is accepted by the House of Lords, Lord Hanningfield will not be able attend the House until April 2012. The independent Lords Commissioner for Standards had found that Lord Hanningfield wrongly claimed £30,254.50. He has previously repaid £1,800 and confirmed, in oral evidence to the Committee, that he planned to repay the full amount he wrongly claimed and would not return to the House until he had done so.
Well, I guess it's all right if you look all sheepish, say that you're "vewy vewy sowwy, but I paid it all back and 'ave thought about wot I dun and, cor-blimey, but it is such a privilege to serve the public so."

And here am I, stressing about the register of electors demands for their forms to be filled out, It's a thousand pound fine not to have my information to be given to credit reference agencies, don'tcha know.
There are some days when I have to look the other way in embarrassment when I think about my country.
__________________

when you’ve been so long in the desert, any water, no matter how brackish, looks like life


jumpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-11, 09:44 PM   #2
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

Works for the US Congress, too.

Or Cabinet positions (last few years tax fraud is practically required for a Cabinet post).
__________________
"Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." — Thomas Paine
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.