SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-11, 11:04 PM   #1
Armistead
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: on the Dan
Posts: 10,880
Downloads: 364
Uploads: 0


Default Japan plant rating raised to level 7

" Japan's nuclear regulators raised the severity level of the crisis at a stricken nuclear plant Tuesday to rank it on par with the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, citing the amount of radiation released in the accident.

The regulators said the rating was being raised from 5 to 7 - the highest level on an international scale overseen by the International Atomic Energy Agency. However, there was no sign of any significant change at the tsunami-stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant.

The new ranking signifies a "major accident" with "wider consequences" than the previous level, according to the Vienna-based IAEA.

"We have upgraded the severity level to 7 as the impact of radiation leaks has been widespread from the air, vegetables, tap water and the ocean," said Minoru Oogoda of Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency.

Tokyo Electric Power Co., the operator of the plant, is still estimating the total amount of radioactive material that might be released by the accident, said company spokesman Junichi Matsumoto.

He acknowledged the amount of radioactivity released might even exceed the amount emitted by Chernobyl. "


Wonder how Tokyo will be effected by this..
Armistead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-11, 12:07 AM   #2
TorpX
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,975
Downloads: 153
Uploads: 11
Default

My impression was that the level 5 rating was exceeded some time ago. This seems like a formality to me. Perhaps they wanted to delay this because they were afraid of panic.
TorpX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-11, 12:20 AM   #3
GoldenRivet
Subsim Aviator
 
GoldenRivet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,726
Downloads: 146
Uploads: 0


Default

Like i said in that other thread a few weeks ago that i was basically laughed out of - a large chunk of the region will be uninhabitable for many years to come.

some years from now, we will likely be seeing images like this of that area coming out of Japan.

very disturbing.
__________________
GoldenRivet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-11, 03:39 AM   #4
Matador.es
Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 327
Downloads: 30
Uploads: 0
Default

In Holland a debate was rising about our only nuclear plant. We have a small one and dont have any natural hazards except flooding. What about in the states? Does the same question lives? How dependant are the states of nuclear energy?
Matador.es is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-11, 06:14 AM   #5
Castout
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
Default

7 from 5 when did they get to 6? You mean they skipped?


Asians and saving faces . Give it a break I mean it was a NATURAL disaster that caused this. Or are they implying their authority had the power to stop the earthquake and the resulting tsunami?! Damn what a cocky. Stupid but cocky.
__________________
Castout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-11, 06:16 AM   #6
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,602
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Don't worry. The Japanese also said that the max rating now is only "temporary".

The political hesitation do fully realise the dimension of the events and the full meaning of them for Japan, can only be explained by that slowly they become aware that for a nation sitting on a small island in one of the geologically most active regions of this planet, having almost 5 dozen nuclear reactors does not sound like a good idea.

Now that they have learned what the term "residual risk" means, many probably ask themselves if after Nagasaki and Hiroshima they have chosen the right path when making their economical rebirth depending on nuclear power so exclusively. Since the pro-nuke lobby is extremely powerful and has brainwashed the Japanese since decades (military nukes are bad, civilian nuke is great), they are slowly stumbling towards what later may show to be something not short of a full cultural revolution.

What amazes me is that Japan, land of the robots, so far does nto seem to have used robots of Japanese production at Fukushima. Special machinery from Germany, and robots from America, Canada and Germany were reported to have been the only ones being used so far. Where is the Sonybot when you need him?
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-11, 07:38 AM   #7
Catfish
Dipped Squirrel Operative
 
Catfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: ..where the ocean meets the sky
Posts: 17,765
Downloads: 38
Uploads: 0


Default

Robots, especially when they are fitted with transistors, printed circuits and micro processors, are extremely vulnerable to radiation.
There was a reason why the Mig-29 partially used vacuum tubes for basic flight systems in case of an electromagnetic impulse, or radiation.
Two robots have been tried, and they stopped a hundred meters from the plant or so they said due to circuit failures.

Certainly, there are also special radiation suits made in the US that have been sent to Japan, but they never used them, i am sure the workers were never shown them at all. Plastic bags are so much better.
As well i saw at at least one photo the workers did not wear their oxygen masks right - it's all about "saving faces"

Greetings,
Catfish
Catfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-11, 06:55 AM   #8
Penguin
Ocean Warrior
 
Penguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Rheinische Republik
Posts: 3,322
Downloads: 92
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenRivet View Post
Like i said in that other thread a few weeks ago that i was basically laughed out of - a large chunk of the region will be uninhabitable for many years to come.

some years from now, we will likely be seeing images like this of that area coming out of Japan.

very disturbing.
There is one big difference between the Chernobyl region and Fukushima: the population density. It was relatively easy to make a no-go area around Pripjat, not to forget Volincy in Belarus http://www.science-connections.com/b...Paper_1821.pdf - since these areas consist mostly of forest and agricultural land.

This map gives a good overview:
Penguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-11, 07:36 AM   #9
DarkFish
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Stinking drunk in Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Posts: 1,844
Downloads: 28
Uploads: 0
Default

Glad I'm out of the country. The first and maybe the only time I'm in Japan, and immediately an earthquake, a tsunami and a nuclear crisis hit the country Seems I attract disasters or something...
__________________

DarkFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-11, 07:43 AM   #10
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,602
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkFish View Post
Glad I'm out of the country. The first and maybe the only time I'm in Japan, and immediately an earthquake, a tsunami and a nuclear crisis hit the country Seems I attract disasters or something...
Reminds me of a quote by Peter Falk in that famous crime parody movie, I just don't get the title right now, many famous detectives meet in a villa where their host is getting assassinated and demands them to solve the case. Falk tells his darling (translated from the German version):

"Trusting you...? Honey, last time I trusted a woman was in 1940, and one week later the Germans marched into Paris."
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.