![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Mate
![]() Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 52
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I can't kill the Arleigh Burke. Simple as that. Using LWAMI 3.10 it's like trying to solve a rubix cube. Nearly impossible for me. Here is some of my problems.
ASM's...from far away or short range = same result - all my missles get shot down and I'm always detected and shots sent my way always kill me. 53cm torps = Short range works, but they are too weak so you have to send at least 2, (3 is better) however, you can nearly bet that the return fire will kill you. Almost no chance. 53cm long range = torps only good out to 10 mi. Long range impossible because the AB out runs the range and wire is cut. Impossible. 63cm wake and 53 wake, no guidance and if you're too short range, = impossible because of the return fire. Long range = AB has plenty of time, always detects torps, and simply speeds up and gets out of the way causing torps to miss. So in short, I'm out of short range options and long range options.
__________________
There is no need to run........you are already dead. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 79
Downloads: 58
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Kapitan,
The RINS (Russian Institute for Naval Studies, and yes, I just made that up) have been analyzing your tactical problem. We believe that the Arleigh Burke can be defeated by employing our newest tactic; the Bracket Attack™. Try hiding below the layer (If you have one) and fire 2-4 65cm torpedoes at him. Target one at him, a snapshot on both sides, and your final 65cm should enable well behind him. If he runs left, right, or away he'll eat a 65cm. If that fails you could simply load your internal and external tubes with SS-N-27 Anti-ship missiles, and set the enable to 10 nmi. ![]() As soon as you fire make a hard course change. If he fires on you, launch one active and one passive countermeasure. Then order 300m and put the hammer down.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Hemisphere, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster
Posts: 585
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
On a similar note, it is nearly- no, not nearly. It IS impossible to penetrate a USN carrier strike group through aerial means in the LwAmi v3.10 mod.
![]() Believe me, I tried. I sent almost 200 Backfire bombers armed for ASUW warfare at the group. Not one missile hit any ship in the group. All of the bombers were shot down. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 79
Downloads: 58
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]() Quote:
For a torpedo attack, just fire from inside no-escape range. (Or, if you want to stay away from ASROCs, fire from under the layer, if available, outside ASROC range and let the torps get close... works best if the target speed is relatively high, if it's slow it might be listening under the layer on its TA). Get a little closer if you're using wakehomers and expect to lose one weapon to the Nixie if you're using acoustic homing. There really isn't anything special about the Burke, from the point of view of a submarine. It's just like any other warship armed with SAMs and ASROCs. Quote:
__________________
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Hemisphere, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster
Posts: 585
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Current units... hmmm.... a saturation attack of Brahmos missiles comes to mind. Or a large number of surface ships (like 30+) firing YJ-83s. 2 or more AEGIS ships makes for a tough nut to crack, AEGIS ships are sort of like Excalibur, armies and nations tremble at its mention for good reason... ![]() A container ship with Klub missiles from inside the AAW screen comes to mind as well if you are feeling sneaky... ![]() You could also slug it out, make wave after wave of attacks from outside of SAM range with air launched standoff missiles (N-27s, KH-65s etc) and deplete the VLS cells. Its not pretty but it works. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 956
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
When attacking another unit always keep in mind "What is its main job and what are its capabilities". Now the AEGIS Ships are designed as main AAW defenders if you shoot at it with missiles you fight it on its own turf - bad idea. Instead attack it with torpedos - the more the merrier. Your chances are a lot higher doing that.
As far as missiles are concerned ... lots of em from different angles arriving at the same time ... that should work. But I cant emphasize enough the fact that missiles should not be your primary choice against AEGIS ships. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Hemisphere, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster
Posts: 585
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I also noticed that in a combat situation regarding a CVN CSG, FFGs are the first to go, as the Oliver Hazard Perry-class FFG is an aging platform and has little defense, if all, against ASMs particularly super-sonic ones. All it has is a single-armed Mk 13 missile launcher forward, and one Phalanx CIWS aft. That's it. Not to mention that the FFGs resistance against damage is like a boxer with no chin. ![]() Anyway, the best weapon to use is the torpedo, I agree. But the CSG's ASW capabilities are fairly good and combine the fact of escorting SSNs, it'll be a tough nut to crack. ![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by Kaye T. Bai; 01-23-11 at 04:29 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]() Quote:
...not in DW.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Under the waterline the FFG-7 is to sensors what the AEGIS ships are above the waterline. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]() Quote:
That being said, I haven't put the BrahMos on any aircraft yet, although I will as soon as I read that the air-launched version has reached IOC. Right now the weapon that comes to mind is the Kh-31A, which is a miniaturized version of the SS-N-22. It's carried by Russian and Chinese Flankers. You're still better off using the more traditional approach of surface ships/SSGNs to hit a CSG, mostly because the aircraft AI is horrible. With either approach, saturation is key, and the designer is going to need to do a few tricks to maximize the # of missiles in the air at a time. EDIT: And as TLAM mentioned, we'll have Su-34s armed with Alphas the next release.
__________________
![]() Last edited by Molon Labe; 01-24-11 at 01:49 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I dont see how the AS4 couldnt beat AEGIS. IT can in fleet command NWP when fired a lot.
Regardless,i recommend the KH-15S. It goes 3200+ knots. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]()
It cruises at very high altitude, it's very large, and it radiates from a long way off. Impossible not to see coming, and plenty of time to shoot it down.
Interesting about the KH-15S. I don't see it being much more effective, but carrying 10 instead of 3 can make a difference. I may have to designate the existing Backfire Tu-22M2 and add a -22M3 with the Kh-15...
__________________
![]() Last edited by Molon Labe; 01-26-11 at 06:07 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|