SubSim Engine DevTeam (open for joining)

[aergistal]

This is a thread dedicated to the creation of an independent sub simulator from scratch with the help of subsim users.

All it takes is good men, right?

I think it can be done. First step is to write the software requirements, we can start with what we want out of it then laying out features and selecting the best of them. We'll have issues of complexity and since not all of us own mainframes at home we have to select the level of simulation we want out of it.

Don't think of the team as only programmers and 3d artists. We also need coordinators, researchers, you name it or just people with good ideas.

It's also a good idea to see what everyone can do, you know like a short cv.

To start with me: I can do C#, Java, C/C++ if I must though I don't particularily enjoy it. I'm a Cisco CCNA 1-4 and have knowledge of networking. I studied AI for fun, like neural networks in computer vision.
I'm also an architecture student so I can use pretty much every 3d modelling platform (currently playing with Blender since it's free).

I also have knowledge of different open-source tools that can help create an assembly pipeline.

[gutted]

I feel your pain about C++. Since using C# i dont particularily enjoy it anymore either.

[Takao]

I guess you have not heard of "Danger from the Deep" then.
http://dangerdeep.sourceforge.net/

[aergistal]

Ocean Simulation

Real-time ocean rendering and lighting (OpenGL)

Whitepaper
Source Code

NVIDIA Ocean Simulation using DX Compute

Whitepaper

Hydrax-SkyX tech demo (for Ogre3D)

http://www.ogre3d.org/wiki/index.php/Hydrax

osgOcean (for OpenSceneGraph)

Source Code

XNA Ocean (for Microsoft XNA)
not so impressive right now but it can be tweaked

Well, I can say that this is a very good and honorable idea, but it will probably won't materialize into something real, since the majority of the community members here (or at least the ones that are the most vocal about how "great" SH5 it is) acts like zombies most of the times, like they were "injected" by UBI, they seem to be very happy and satisfied with what UBI are giving them, like you are throwing some rotten food into an overpopulated hog pen. Of course, they are hungry and they will devour everything you will give them, even if you will throw your wastes from your kitchen, for them everything tastes like kaviar. I wish you luck anyway, but my advice is to be prepared for a big disillusion regarding your potential real feedback that you probably hope to receive in this matter from the members. I really don't want to insult anyone, but this is what I think.

About Danger From The Deep, don't count on that game, it's in development state since a few years ago, and it will probably be in the same state in the following years from now on. It's made by a few enthusiasts, but they are not supported (official or for real) by anyone here, on subsim.

And last, but not least, I am not sure if this community truly DESERVES something different or better than SH5. Just a theme that you find might worthy to think about. ...

[aergistal]

Danger From The Deep looks nice and if we can help them it's better than starting from scratch. I'll have to look into it a bit and see some documentation.

The idea is not to make another SH5 at once. I was thinking of separating the work into independent modules that would be used by any number of other projects.

The least we could do is to make Software Requirements Specification paper and put it on the site. That won't require actual programming and any company interested in developing a sub sim would have part of the work done.

[subdragoon]

Originally Posted by aergistal

Danger From The Deep looks nice and if we can help them it's better than starting from scratch. I'll have to look into it a bit and see some documentation.

The idea is not to make another SH5 at once. I was thinking of separating the work into independent modules that would be used by any number of other projects.

The least we could do is to make Software Requirements Specification paper and put it on the site. That won't require actual programming and any company interested in developing a sub sim would have part of the work done.

i agree 100%. great ideas. DFtD looks very promising, especially if more people from this community join in on it. better than scratch.

[Sonarman]

Originally Posted by aergistal

The least we could do is to make Software Requirements Specification paper and put it on the site. That won't require actual programming and any company interested in developing a sub sim would have part of the work done.

Here's a somewhat crazy idea...I wonder what would happen if we did the above and offered a prize of say $5000 (from community donations) and posted on every indie game forum out there on the understanding that the winning project whilst credited to it creators would be copyright free open source at the end of the competition that could be used as a springboard for anyone who wished to take it further.

[edu]

Do you know Flightgear? Open source, GNU, multi-platform flight simulator. It´s a very interesting project and it´s free.


http://www.flightgear.org/

[Hartmann]

The future of simulators in a console world is this, create a open source engine wich can render a planet with some detail and that can be used for flight, sea, and ground. with a sdk able to create all kind of vehicles, spacecrafts ,submarines and warships and use it in the engine.

A linux equivalent but for games.

[IanC]

Originally Posted by aergistal

This is a thread dedicated to the creation of an independent sub simulator from scratch with the help of subsim users.

All it takes is good men, right?

I think it can be done.

I admire your initiative aergistal, if I knew anything about programing I'd be on board for sure.

[Kpt. Lehmann]

Originally Posted by aergistal

All it takes is good men, right?

Yes.