SH3 and 4: Which has the more compelling campaign experience (historically speaking).

Agiel7 · 02-11-09, 12:23 AM

Given the historical context, it seems to me that the career of SH3 makes for the more compelling experience. For example, in SH3, you command a U-boat during the time that Germany was losing the war and you and your fellow wolves were just buying time, while late in the war on the Pacific Theatre, Japan was losing ground left, right, and center to the US and in SH4, it kind of felt like you were kicking the Japanese while they were down (not to discount the US sailors who served on subs in WWII, since they helped keep weapons and ammunition that could have killed a lot more Americans out of Japanese hands), and while the US sub crews had the luxury of air conditioning and an onboard ice cream machine, the Germans had to wade through sausages and bananas with wierd black spots on them just to see their speed and depth below keel.

Your thoughts?

02-11-09, 12:23 AM	#1
Agiel7 Gunner Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 97 Downloads: 16 Uploads: 0	SH3 and 4: Which has the more compelling campaign experience (historically speaking). Given the historical context, it seems to me that the career of SH3 makes for the more compelling experience. For example, in SH3, you command a U-boat during the time that Germany was losing the war and you and your fellow wolves were just buying time, while late in the war on the Pacific Theatre, Japan was losing ground left, right, and center to the US and in SH4, it kind of felt like you were kicking the Japanese while they were down (not to discount the US sailors who served on subs in WWII, since they helped keep weapons and ammunition that could have killed a lot more Americans out of Japanese hands), and while the US sub crews had the luxury of air conditioning and an onboard ice cream machine, the Germans had to wade through sausages and bananas with wierd black spots on them just to see their speed and depth below keel. Your thoughts?