![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Herefordshire, England
Posts: 3,562
Downloads: 216
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7777723.stm
I wonder how many more delays this project will have? I still think the MOD where being very optimistic with there original target of 2014 ,2016.
__________________
![]() Last edited by mr chris; 12-11-08 at 04:25 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Better to be delayed than cancelled. They are still working on them. Steel has been cut just fit out will be extended. In some ways since the JSF is late there would be nothing to fly from them as the RAF is trying to can the joint harrier force.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Herefordshire, England
Posts: 3,562
Downloads: 216
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Very true would be pointless having two massive carriers with nothing to fly off them.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
At least they will be built, and they will give the RN alot more flexability when they deploy them. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Herefordshire, England
Posts: 3,562
Downloads: 216
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
That is two of the reasons the US government is so eager for us to have them.
__________________
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 936
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: 11SMS 98896 10565
Posts: 756
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Poor RN, a shadow of its former self. I guess when you don't have far flung colonies to patrol around one doesn't need the size, but still ... they're already paying off the Type 23s!
![]()
__________________
"The Federation needs men like you, doctor. Men of conscience. Men of principle. Men who can sleep at night... You're also the reason Section Thirty-one exists -- someone has to protect men like you from a universe that doesn't share your sense of right and wrong." -Sloan, Section Thirty-One ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Actually I was looking at the current numbers for the RN and I don't think they are as bad as made out in the press.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
I think we were down to 80/82 in number last year (and that included the small fry)....but I wonder just how many are at sea or in a good state of readiness at any given time :hmm:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Grey Wolf
|
![]()
I think Jimbuna's about right, at present I reckon we have a total of 64 warships of MCMV size and above (including those in mothballs but genuinely able to be re-activated):
3 Carriers 8 Type 42 Destroyers 4 Type 22 Frigates 13 Type 23 Frigates 3 Assault Ships 8 Trafalgar SSNs 1 Swiftsure SSNs 4 Vanguard SSBNs 4 River Class Patrol Vessels 8 Hunt MCMVs 8 Sandown MCMVs There are also the 16 essential RFAs: 4 Bay Class Landing Ships 4 Fort Class Replenishment Ships 2 Wave Class Fast Fleet Tankers 2 Leaf Class Support Tankers 2 Rover Class Small Fleet Tankers 1 Forward Support Ship 1 Aviation Training/Casualty Reception Ship |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Still better than other euro navies.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
But how many of our European counterparts have the same level of responsibility or committments :hmm:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 936
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
This list is rather optimistic:
One Invincible class is always in reserve. Also, ever since the retirement of the Sea Harrier, I suppose you cannot consider the Invincibles as effective as before. They're not able to put up a credible air defense. The single spanish and italian VTOL carriers have Radar equipped AMRAAM capable Harriers, but the british Harriers are limited to visual air to air. The Type 42 destroyers have basically no AAW capacity left as the Sea Dart missile is on its way out, AFAIK the missiles have reached the end of their shelf lives. Right now HMS Daring is the only AAW unit of the RN. The 23s are great ships, though, as are the 22s. Re the SSNs, HMS Sceptre is not operational and most likely will never be again. The Trafalgars have had their problems recently, I wonder wether this is due to slackening of standards or simply because the USN keeps a tighter secrecy regarding such "minor" incidents. All european navies have their problems, so I wouldn't be surprised if the french, italian and spanish navies will start decommissioning ships soon.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|