SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-08, 01:30 PM   #1
mr chris
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Herefordshire, England
Posts: 3,562
Downloads: 216
Uploads: 0
Default New Royal Navy Carriers Delayed.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7777723.stm

I wonder how many more delays this project will have?
I still think the MOD where being very optimistic with there original target of 2014 ,2016.
__________________

Last edited by mr chris; 12-11-08 at 04:25 PM.
mr chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-08, 04:15 PM   #2
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

Better to be delayed than cancelled. They are still working on them. Steel has been cut just fit out will be extended. In some ways since the JSF is late there would be nothing to fly from them as the RAF is trying to can the joint harrier force.
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-08, 04:25 PM   #3
mr chris
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Herefordshire, England
Posts: 3,562
Downloads: 216
Uploads: 0
Default

Very true would be pointless having two massive carriers with nothing to fly off them.
__________________
mr chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-08, 04:43 PM   #4
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr chris
Very true would be pointless having two massive carriers with nothing to fly off them.
Maybe they could fly a kite???:hmm:

At least they will be built, and they will give the RN alot more flexability when they deploy them.
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-08, 04:46 PM   #5
mr chris
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Herefordshire, England
Posts: 3,562
Downloads: 216
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bookworm_020
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr chris
Very true would be pointless having two massive carriers with nothing to fly off them.

At least they will be built, and they will give the RN alot more flexability when they deploy them.
It will give us a better strike ability and more maneuverability.

That is two of the reasons the US government is so eager for us to have them.
__________________
mr chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-08, 05:30 PM   #6
AntEater
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 936
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

__________________
AntEater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-08, 08:25 PM   #7
JALU3
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 11SMS 98896 10565
Posts: 756
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Poor RN, a shadow of its former self. I guess when you don't have far flung colonies to patrol around one doesn't need the size, but still ... they're already paying off the Type 23s!
__________________
"The Federation needs men like you, doctor. Men of conscience. Men of principle.
Men who can sleep at night... You're also the reason Section Thirty-one exists --
someone has to protect men like you from a universe that doesn't share your
sense of right and wrong."
-Sloan, Section Thirty-One
JALU3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-08, 03:30 AM   #8
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

Actually I was looking at the current numbers for the RN and I don't think they are as bad as made out in the press.
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-08, 04:09 PM   #9
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,473
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

I think we were down to 80/82 in number last year (and that included the small fry)....but I wonder just how many are at sea or in a good state of readiness at any given time :hmm:
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-08, 01:06 AM   #10
lesrae
Grey Wolf
 
lesrae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Somerset, UK.
Posts: 932
Downloads: 31
Uploads: 0


Default

I think Jimbuna's about right, at present I reckon we have a total of 64 warships of MCMV size and above (including those in mothballs but genuinely able to be re-activated):

3 Carriers
8 Type 42 Destroyers
4 Type 22 Frigates
13 Type 23 Frigates
3 Assault Ships
8 Trafalgar SSNs
1 Swiftsure SSNs
4 Vanguard SSBNs
4 River Class Patrol Vessels
8 Hunt MCMVs
8 Sandown MCMVs

There are also the 16 essential RFAs:

4 Bay Class Landing Ships
4 Fort Class Replenishment Ships
2 Wave Class Fast Fleet Tankers
2 Leaf Class Support Tankers
2 Rover Class Small Fleet Tankers
1 Forward Support Ship
1 Aviation Training/Casualty Reception Ship
lesrae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-08, 05:00 AM   #11
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

Still better than other euro navies.
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-08, 05:46 AM   #12
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,473
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

But how many of our European counterparts have the same level of responsibility or committments :hmm:
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-08, 07:55 AM   #13
AntEater
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 936
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

This list is rather optimistic:
One Invincible class is always in reserve.
Also, ever since the retirement of the Sea Harrier, I suppose you cannot consider the Invincibles as effective as before.
They're not able to put up a credible air defense.
The single spanish and italian VTOL carriers have Radar equipped AMRAAM capable Harriers, but the british Harriers are limited to visual air to air.
The Type 42 destroyers have basically no AAW capacity left as the Sea Dart missile is on its way out, AFAIK the missiles have reached the end of their shelf lives.
Right now HMS Daring is the only AAW unit of the RN.
The 23s are great ships, though, as are the 22s.
Re the SSNs, HMS Sceptre is not operational and most likely will never be again.
The Trafalgars have had their problems recently, I wonder wether this is due to slackening of standards or simply because the USN keeps a tighter secrecy regarding such "minor" incidents.
All european navies have their problems, so I wouldn't be surprised if the french, italian and spanish navies will start decommissioning ships soon.
__________________
AntEater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-08, 12:58 PM   #14
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,473
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Ah well....only one thing for it then

__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.